Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
New Solut ; 28(3): 416-447, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30180781

ABSTRACT

When the Deepwater Horizon oil rig blew out in 2010, the immediate threats to productive deep water and estuarial fisheries and the region's fishing and energy economies were obvious. Less immediately obvious, but equally unsettling, were risks to human health posed by potential damage to the regional food web. This paper describes grassroots and regional efforts by the Gulf Coast Health Alliance: health risks related to the Macondo Spill Fishermen's Citizen Science Network project. Using a community-based participatory research approach and a citizen science structure, the multiyear project measured exposure to petrogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, researched the toxicity of these polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds, and communicated project findings and seafood consumption guidelines throughout the region (coastal Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama). Description/analysis focuses primarily on the process of building a network of working fishermen and developing group environmental health literacy competencies.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Health/standards , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Petroleum Pollution/analysis , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis , Community-Based Participatory Research , Cooperative Behavior , Disasters , Food Contamination/analysis , Gulf of Mexico , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.)/organization & administration , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Organizational Objectives , Program Development , Seafood/analysis , United States
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29088124

ABSTRACT

The Deepwater Horizon (DWH) explosion in 2010 is the largest oil spill (Macondo) in U.S. HISTORY: We focused on gaining an understanding of the physical health and mental health effects attributable to the Macondo oil spill. This is a report of a cross-sectional cohort study (wave 1) to establish 'baseline' findings and meant to provide descriptive information to be used for a multi-wave, longitudinal study. Gulf Coast Health Alliance: health Risks related to the Macondo Spill (GC-HARMS) uses a Community-Based Participatory Research approach, thus including multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional academic partners and representatives of three communities impacted by the spill. Three research sites were selected for human sampling along the Gulf of Mexico coast including two from Mississippi and one from Louisiana, with Galveston, Texas, serving as a comparison site, given that it was not directly impacted by the spill. One hundred participants were selected from each community, representing adults, seniors and children, with approximately equal numbers of males and females in each group. Participants completed initial assessments including completion of a 'baseline' survey and, rigorous physical assessments. Results from wave 1 data collection reported herein reveal changes in self-reported physical health and mental health status following the oil spill, disparities in access to healthcare, and associations between mental health and emotional conditions related to displacement/unemployment. Few environmental health studies have been conducted in communities impacted by significant oil spills. Results imply potential prolonged effects on mental health and community vulnerability.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Petroleum Pollution/adverse effects , Petroleum Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Water Pollutants, Chemical/adverse effects , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Cohort Studies , Community-Based Participatory Research , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gulf of Mexico , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Louisiana , Male , Mississippi , Self Report , Texas
3.
Am Fam Physician ; 92(3): 187-96, 2015 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26280139

ABSTRACT

Rosacea is a chronic facial skin condition of unknown cause. It is characterized by marked involvement of the central face with transient or persistent erythema, telangiectasia, inflammatory papules and pustules, or hyperplasia of the connective tissue. Transient erythema, or flushing, is often accompanied by a feeling of warmth. It usually lasts for less than five minutes and may spread to the neck and chest. Less common findings include erythematous plaques, scaling, edema, phymatous changes (thickening of skin due to hyperplasia of sebaceous glands), and ocular symptoms. The National Rosacea Society Expert Committee defines four subtypes of rosacea (erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, and ocular) and one variant (granulomatous). Treatment starts with avoidance of triggers and use of mild cleansing agents and moisturizing regimens, as well as photoprotection with wide-brimmed hats and broad-spectrum sunscreens (minimum sun protection factor of 30). For inflammatory lesions and erythema, the recommended initial treatments are topical metronidazole or azelaic acid. Once-daily brimonidine, a topical alpha-adrenergic receptor agonist, is effective in reducing erythema. Papulopustular rosacea can be treated with systemic therapy including tetracyclines, most commonly subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline. Phymatous rosacea is treated primarily with laser or light-based therapies. Ocular rosacea is managed with lid hygiene, topical cyclosporine, and topical or systemic antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Phototherapy , Rosacea/diagnosis , Rosacea/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Education, Medical, Continuing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...