Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab ; 299(6): E918-27, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20739508

ABSTRACT

The lactating mammary gland synthesizes large amounts of triglyceride from fatty acids derived from the blood and from de novo lipogenesis. The latter is significantly increased at parturition and decreased when additional dietary fatty acids become available. To begin to understand the molecular regulation of de novo lipogenesis, we tested the hypothesis that the transcription factor sterol regulatory element binding factor (SREBF)-1c is a primary regulator of this system. Expression of Srebf1c mRNA and six of its known target genes increased ≥2.5-fold at parturition. However, Srebf1c-null mice showed only minor deficiencies in lipid synthesis during lactation, possibly due to compensation by Srebf1a expression. To abrogate the function of both isoforms of Srebf1, we bred mice to obtain a mammary epithelial cell-specific deletion of SREBF cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), the SREBF escort protein. These dams showed a significant lactation deficiency, and expression of mRNA for fatty acid synthase (Fasn), insulin-induced gene 1 (Insig1), mitochondrial citrate transporter (Slc25a1), and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 2 (Scd2) was reduced threefold or more; however, the mRNA levels of acetyl-CoA carboxylase-1α (Acaca) and ATP citrate lyase (Acly) were unchanged. Furthermore, a 46% fat diet significantly decreased de novo fatty acid synthesis and reduced the protein levels of ACACA, ACLY, and FASN significantly, with no change in their mRNA levels. These data lead us to conclude that two modes of regulation exist to control fatty acid synthesis in the mammary gland of the lactating mouse: the well-known SREBF1 system and a novel mechanism that acts at the posttranscriptional level in the presence of SCAP deletion and high-fat feeding to alter enzyme protein.


Subject(s)
Dietary Fats/metabolism , Fatty Acids/biosynthesis , Lactation/metabolism , Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1/metabolism , Animals , Blotting, Western , Fatty Acids/analysis , Female , Gene Expression , Immunohistochemistry , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Lipogenesis/genetics , Mammary Glands, Animal/cytology , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Milk/chemistry , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1/genetics
2.
Fly (Austin) ; 3(4): 253-62, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19949290

ABSTRACT

Cell fate determination in many systems is based upon inductive events driven by cell-cell interactions. Inductive signaling regulates many aspects of Drosophila compound eye development. Accumulating evidence suggests that the color sensitivity of the R8 photoreceptor cell within an individual ommatidium is regulated by an inductive signal from the adjacent R7 photoreceptor cell. This signal is thought to control an induced versus default cell-fate switch that coordinates the visual pigment expression and color sensitivities of adjacent R7 and R8 photoreceptor cells. Here we describe a disruption in R7 and R8 cell patterning in Scutoid mutants that is due to inappropriate signals from Rh4-expressing R7 cells inducing Rh5 expression in adjacent R8 cells. This dominant phenotype results from the misexpression of the transcriptional repressor snail, which with the co-repressor C-terminal-Binding-Protein represses rhomboid expression in the developing eye. We show that loss of rhomboid suppresses the Scutoid phenotype. However in contrast to the loss of rhomboid alone, which entirely blocks the normal inductive signal from the R7 to the R8 photoreceptor cell, Scutoid rhomboid double mutants display normal Rh5 and Rh6 expression. Our detailed analysis of this unusual dominant gain-of-function neomorphic phenotype suggests that the induction of Rh5 expression in Scutoid mutants is partially rhomboid independent.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/physiology , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Phenotype , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/physiology , Signal Transduction/physiology , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/physiology , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Mutation/genetics , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/ultrastructure , Retinal Pigments/metabolism , Rhodopsin/metabolism , Signal Transduction/genetics , Transcription Factors/physiology
3.
Cell Cycle ; 8(15): 2413-9, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19556869

ABSTRACT

Entry into mitosis requires the activation of mitotic kinases, including Aurora A and Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Increased levels of these kinases are frequently found associated with human cancers, and therefore it is imperative to understand the processes leading to their activation. We demonstrate that TPX2, but neither Ajuba nor Inhibitor-2, can activate Aurora A directly. Moreover, Plx1 can induce Aurora A T-loop phosphorylation indirectly in vivo during oocyte maturation. We identify Ser204 in TPX2 as a Plx1 phosphorylation site. Mutating Ser204 to alanine decreases activation of Aurora A, whereas a phosphomimetic Asp mutant exhibits enhanced activating ability. Finally, we show that phosphorylation of TPX2 with Plx1 increases its ability to activate Aurora A. Taken together, our data indicate that Plx1 promotes activation of Aurora A, most likely through TPX2. In light of the current literature, we propose a model in which Plx1 and Aurora A activate each other in a positive feedback loop.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Oocytes/metabolism , Phosphoproteins/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Xenopus Proteins/metabolism , Xenopus laevis/metabolism , Animals , Aurora Kinases , CHO Cells/metabolism , Cell Cycle/physiology , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Phosphorylation/physiology
4.
J Neurosci ; 29(9): 2666-75, 2009 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19261861

ABSTRACT

Color vision is based on the differential color sensitivity of retinal photoreceptors, however the developmental programs that control photoreceptor cell differentiation and specify color sensitivity are poorly understood. In Drosophila there is growing evidence that the color sensitivity of the R8 cell within an individual ommatidium is regulated by an inductive signal from the adjacent R7 cell. We previously examined the retinal patterning defect in Scutoid mutants, which results from a disruption of rhomboid expression. Here we show that loss of rhomboid blocks the induction of Rh5 expression and misexpression of rhomboid leads to the inappropriate induction of Rh5. These effects are specific to rhomboid, because its paralogue roughoid is neither required nor sufficient for the induction of Rh5 expression. We show that rhomboid is required cell-autonomously within the R8 photoreceptor cells and nonautonomously elsewhere in the eye for Rh5 induction. Interestingly, we found that the Epidermal growth factor receptor is also required for Rh5 induction, and its activation is sufficient to rescue the loss of Rh5 induction in a rhomboid mutant. This suggests that rhomboid may function in R8 cells to activate Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in R7 cells and promote their differentiation to a signaling competent state.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Membrane Proteins/physiology , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/cytology , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/physiology , Algorithms , Animals , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Compound Eye, Arthropod/anatomy & histology , Compound Eye, Arthropod/metabolism , Compound Eye, Arthropod/physiology , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/biosynthesis , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , ErbB Receptors/physiology , Genotype , Immunohistochemistry , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Rhodopsin/biosynthesis , Rhodopsin/genetics , rho-Associated Kinases/genetics
5.
J Biol Chem ; 284(9): 5717-22, 2009 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19126545

ABSTRACT

The molecular mechanisms that regulate invertebrate visual pigment absorption are poorly understood. Through sequence analysis and functional investigation of vertebrate visual pigments, numerous amino acid substitutions important for this adaptive process have been identified. Here we describe a serine/alanine (S/A) substitution in long wavelength-absorbing Drosophila visual pigments that occurs at a site corresponding to Ala-292 in bovine rhodopsin. This S/A substitution accounts for a 10-17-nm absorption shift in visual pigments of this class. Additionally, we demonstrate that substitution of a cysteine at the same site, as occurs in the blue-absorbing Rh5 pigment, accounts for a 4-nm shift. Substitutions at this site are the first spectrally significant amino acid changes to be identified for invertebrate pigments sensitive to visible light and are the first evidence of a conserved tuning mechanism in vertebrate and invertebrate pigments of this class.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Light , Retinal Pigments/chemistry , Rhodopsin/chemistry , Rhodopsin/physiology , Amino Acid Substitution , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cattle , Color Perception , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Mutation/genetics , Phylogeny , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells
6.
J Neurosci ; 23(34): 10873-8, 2003 Nov 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14645481

ABSTRACT

Invertebrates are sensitive to a broad spectrum of light that ranges from UV to red. Color sensitivity in the UV plays an important role in foraging, navigation, and mate selection in both flying and terrestrial invertebrate animals. Here, we show that a single amino acid polymorphism is responsible for invertebrate UV vision. This residue (UV: lysine vs blue:asparagine or glutamate) corresponds to amino acid position glycine 90 (G90) in bovine rhodopsin, a site affected in autosomal dominant human congenital night blindness. Introduction of the positively charged lysine in invertebrates is likely to deprotonate the Schiff base chromophore and produce an UV visual pigment. This same position is responsible for regulating UV versus blue sensitivity in several bird species, suggesting that UV vision has arisen independently in invertebrate and vertebrate lineages by a similar molecular mechanism.


Subject(s)
Color Perception/physiology , Drosophila/physiology , Ultraviolet Rays , Amino Acid Substitution , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Cattle , Color Perception/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/chemistry , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Electroretinography , Mutation , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Retinal Pigments/chemistry , Retinal Pigments/genetics , Retinal Pigments/physiology , Rhodopsin/chemistry , Rhodopsin/genetics , Rhodopsin/physiology , Structure-Activity Relationship
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...