Effect of treatment with a full-occlusion biofeedback splint on sleep bruxism and TMD pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to analyze treatment outcome with a full-occlusion biofeedback (BFB) splint on sleep bruxism (SB) and TMD pain compared with treatment with an adjusted occlusal splint (AOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were randomly allocated to a test (BFB) or a control (AOS) group and monitored over a 3-month period. Output variables were frequency and duration of bruxing events (bursts) and various pain symptoms. RESULTS: The BFB group showed a statistically significant reduction in the frequency and duration of bursts and a statistically significant improvement in the patients' global well-being and the facial muscle pain parameter. After the treatment was stopped, the BFB group showed a statistically significant reduction in the average and maximum duration but no statistically significant change in the frequency of bursts. CONCLUSIONS: The tested BFB splint is highly effective in reducing SB at the subconscious level, i.e., without waking the patient, and in achieving improvements in global pain perception. The results suggest that the BFB splint also provides a better treatment option for bruxism-related pain than an AOS. However, further research is needed, and specifically studies with a larger patient population displaying higher levels of pain at baseline. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: By reducing burst duration and therefore the pathological load on the masticatory apparatus, the BFB splint reduces TMD and bruxism-related symptoms and improves patients' physical well-being. In the long term, this could prevent damage to the TMJ. This study confirms the effectiveness and safety of this splint. THE UNIVERSAL TRIAL NUMBER: U1111-1239-2450 DRKS-ID REGISTRATION: DRKS00018092.

Reproducibility of a magnet-based jaw motion analysis system.

BACKGROUND: The Dental Motion Decoder system (DMS-System) is a medical device based on magnetic field technology that records mandible movements. The data can be used to program an articulator or can be directly processed over a computer-aided design (CAD) interface. The present study aimed to assess the reproducibility of this system in vitro and in vivo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Protrusive and laterotrusive movements were simulated in vitro using an articulator (SAM SE) (Group M) and in vivo (Group P) on one test individual. Measurements were carried out in two ways: 1) Measurements were taken after initializing and referencing the system using the reference points (RPs) once, followed by 30 protrusive and laterotrusive movements (M1 and P1); and 2) Thirty individual measurements were recorded using the RPs before each measurement (M2 and P2). Values for the sagittal condylar path inclination angle (sCPIA) and the Bennett angle (BA) were exported and analyzed. The reproducibility of the system was evaluated using the standard deviations (SDs) of the measurement series (sCPIA and BA for M1, M2, P1, and P2). RESULTS: In vitro tests M1 (SD: sCPIA = 0.08 degrees; BA = 0.06 degrees) and M2 (SD: sCPIA = 0.26 degrees; BA = 0.11 degrees) showed significantly higher reproducibility (P < 0.001) compared with the in vivo measurements P1 (SD: sCPIA = 0.61 degrees; BA = 0.45 degrees) and P2 (SD: sCPIA = 1.4 degrees; BA = 0.65 degrees). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, the deviation in vitro, representing the reproducibility of the DMD-System, is smaller than the biologic variance observed in vivo. Therefore, reliable measurements under clinical conditions can be assumed.

Axiographic results of CAD/CAM-assisted microvascular, fibular free flap reconstruction of the mandible: A prospective study of 21 consecutive cases.

Virtual planning and guided reconstruction of the mandible following ablative surgery have become standard procedures in reconstructive surgery. Many advantages regarding operation time, morphology, bony fit, and consolidation have been described, but analyses of the functional outcome of virtually planned mandibular reconstructions are lacking. We prospectively analyzed 21 consecutive cases of mandibular reconstructions using CAD/CAM-assisted microvascular, fibular free flaps in operations between July 2014 and January 2016 at a single center. Axiographic measurements were performed preoperatively and at 10 days and 3 months postoperatively and were correlated with clinical findings. Uni- and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the association between possible predictor variables on functional outcomes. Overall, no statistical differences between the t1 and t3 measurements were seen in the analyzed variables. The univariate analysis showed a significant influence of indication and pre- and postoperative irradiation only on mouth opening (p = 0.018, p = 0.026, and p = 0.049). Timing, the number of osteotomies, and the incidence of wound healing disturbances had no significant influence on postoperative function (p = 0.753, p = 0.69 and p = 0.776). In particular, cases without malignancy or preoperative irradiation benefitted from the integration of the CAD/CAM technique and showed good functional outcomes.

Parallel Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders Treated with a CAD/CAM Versus a Conventional Stabilization Splint.

PURPOSE: This parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared the efficacy of a computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) splint versus a conventional stabilization splint in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 48 age-matched TMD patients from the Ludwig Maximilian University Prosthodontic Department in Munich, Germany, were randomly allocated into groups 1 (CAD/CAM splint) and 2 (conventional splint). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) was used for TMD Axis I (groups I, II, and III) and Axis II (chronic pain grade [CPG]) diagnoses. Numeric scales (TMD/NS, 10 cm) were used to measure headaches, face pain, jaw joint pain, jaw joint noises, mastication pain, neck pain, face tension, limitation of mouth opening, complaints during mastication, and teeth sensitivity at baseline and then monthly for 9 months (T1 to T10). Optical axiography was used to measure right and left condyle movements (mm) at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (T1, T4, and T7). RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (drop-out rate = 33%; 68.75% women; 28.51 ± 7.13 years old), 16 per group, completed the study. RDC/TMD Axis I showed the following diagnoses: 93.75% muscle disorders, 37.75% disc displacement with reduction, 3.12% disc displacement without reduction, and 56.25% arthralgia. There was a significant reduction in 10 out of 13 items of the TMD/NS in the CAD/CAM splint versus 8 out of 13 in the conventional splint. However, no significant improvement in mandibular movements (ie, increase in range of motion and reduction in asymmetry between right and left condyles) was observed. CONCLUSION: Both treatments were equally efficacious and no difference was found between them.