Risk factors for bleeding in hepatocellular adenoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a benign hepatic lesion that may be complicated by bleeding, although the risk of bleeding is ill-defined. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for bleeding in patients diagnosed with HCA. METHODS: Patients with HCA were included prospectively from January 2008 to July 2012. Patient characteristics were noted. Patients underwent dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) at presentation and during follow-up. Lesion characteristics on (follow-up) imaging were noted, and bleeding was graded as intratumoral (grade I), intrahepatic (grade II) or extrahepatic (grade III). The standard of reference for diagnosis was histopathology, or dynamic MRI and/or CT findings. Possible risk factors were included if mentioned in literature (lesion size, body mass index), or based on clinical experience (lesion location, visible vessels on imaging). RESULTS: A total of 45 patients (median age 39 (range 22-60) years; 44 women) with 195 lesions (median size 24 (10-250) mm) were evaluated. Bleeding occurred in 29 patients (64 per cent) and in 42 lesions (21.5 per cent) with a median size of 62 (10-160) mm. Size was a risk factor for bleeding (P < 0.001), with an increased number of bleeding events in lesions of 35 mm or more. Exophytic lesions (protruding from liver) had more bleeding (16 of 24, 67 per cent) than intrahepatic (9 of 82, 11 per cent) or subcapsular (17 of 89, 19 per cent) lesions (P < 0.001). Lesions in segments II and III had more bleeds than those in the right liver (11 of 32 versus 31 of 163; P = 0.049), as did lesions in which peripheral or central arteries were visualized on imaging (10 of 13 versus 32 of 182 lesions with no visible vascularization; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for bleeding of HCA include diameter of 35 mm or more, visualization of lesional arteries, location in the left lateral liver, and exophytic growth.

Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Discrimination between simple and perforated appendicitis in patients with suspected appendicitis may help to determine the therapy, timing of surgery and risk of complications. The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing between simple and perforated appendicitis, and to compare MRI against ultrasound imaging with selected additional (conditional) use of computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were identified prospectively at the emergency department of six hospitals. Consenting patients underwent MRI, but were managed based on findings at ultrasonography and conditional CT. Radiologists who evaluated the MRI were blinded to the results of ultrasound imaging and CT. The presence of perforated appendicitis was recorded after each evaluation. The final diagnosis was assigned by an expert panel based on perioperative data, histopathology and clinical follow-up after 3 months. RESULTS: MRI was performed in 223 of 230 included patients. Acute appendicitis was the final diagnosis in 118 of 230 patients, of whom 87 had simple and 31 perforated appendicitis. MRI correctly identified 17 of 30 patients with perforated appendicitis (sensitivity 57 (95 per cent confidence interval 39 to 73) per cent), whereas ultrasound imaging with conditional CT identified 15 of 31 (sensitivity 48 (32 to 65) per cent) (P = 0.517). All missed diagnoses of perforated appendicitis were identified as simple acute appendicitis with both imaging protocols. None of the MRI features for perforated appendicitis had a positive predictive value higher than 53 per cent. CONCLUSION: MRI is comparable to ultrasonography with conditional use of CT in identifying perforated appendicitis. However, both strategies incorrectly classify up to half of all patients with perforated appendicitis as having simple appendicitis. Triage of appendicitis based on imaging for conservative treatment is inaccurate and may be considered unsafe for decision-making. Presented to a scientific meeting of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 2012; published in abstract form as Br J Surg 2012; 99(Suppl 7): S6.

Accuracy and reproducibility of 3D-CT measurements for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly applied in patients with oesophageal cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine whether 3D-CT volumetry is able to differentiate between responding and non-responding oesophageal tumours early in the course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial CT before and after two weeks of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was performed in the multimodality treatment arm of a randomised trial including patients with oesophageal carcinoma. CT response was measured with the change in tumour volume between baseline and after 14 days of neoadjuvant therapy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of 3D-CT as an early imaging marker of response. RESULTS: CT response analysis was performed in 39 patients, of whom 26 patients were histopathological responders. Median tumour volume increased between baseline and after 14 days of chemoradiotherapy in histopathological responders as well as in non-responders, though changes were not statistically significant. The area under the ROC curve was 0.71. CONCLUSION: Tumour volume changes after 14 days of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as measured by 3D-CT were not associated with histopathological tumour response. CT volumetry should not be used for early response assessment in patients with potentially curable oesophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Additional value of external ultrasonography of the neck after CT and PET scanning in the preoperative assessment of patients with esophageal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphatic dissemination of a (non-cervical) esophageal tumor to the neck is generally considered as distant metastasis. The aim of this study was to determine the additional value of external ultrasonography (US) to detect lymphatic metastasis to the neck after normal CT scan (CT) with or without normal PET scan (PET). METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2005, 306 patients were analyzed for esophageal cancer in our department. A total of 233 patients underwent both CT and external US of the neck. PET was performed in 109 of these patients as part of a prospective cohort study. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was only performed if external US reported suspected lymph nodes. FNA was defined as gold standard. RESULTS: In 176 patients (76%), CT did not identify any suspected nodes, but external US disagreed in 36 of them. In 9 of these patients, FNA confirmed metastasis, resulting in an additional value of external US after normal CT scanning of 5% (9/176). In 74 patients (68%), CT and PET did not identify any suspected nodes, but external US disagreed in 11 of them. In 3 of these patients, FNA confirmed metastasis, resulting in an additional value of external US after normal CT and PET of 4% (3/74). CONCLUSION: Considering its minimal invasiveness and wide availability in combination with the importance of the potential therapeutic consequences, we conclude that external US of the neck should be part of the routine diagnostic work-up in patients with esophageal cancer, even after normal CT and PET scanning.

Limitation of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with a periampullary carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy has been generally accepted in staging of patients with a periampullary malignancy. In our institution diagnostic laparoscopy was routinely used since 1992. However, in 1998 it was eliminated from the protocol since in a prospective study a yield of only 13% was found with a histologically proven accuracy of 60% for distant metastases. The effect of implementation of the new protocol on the occurrence of unnecessary laparotomies and the outcome after bypass surgery was assessed. METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2001, 186 consecutive patients with a potentially resectable periampullary carcinoma after radiological staging without diagnostic laparoscopy underwent explorative laparotomy with the intention to perform a curative pancreatoduodenectomy. Incidence of unresectability and outcome of palliative surgery were assessed. RESULTS: Resection could not be performed in 65 patients who underwent laparotomy because of metastatic disease (29 patients) and loco-regional tumour ingrowth (34 patients). These patients underwent a bypass procedure with a median survival of 216 days. CONCLUSION: At laparotomy distant metastases were detected in 16% of the patients. Considering the fact that the detection rate of diagnostic laparoscopy is lower than 100%, the use of staging laparotomy is too limited to justify it as a routine procedure.