Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Injury ; 45(12): 2002-4, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25257400

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review fracture rates in patients who had X-rays of either the ankle or foot or both in the Emergency Department of a district hospital. METHOD: A retrospective review of 2589 Emergency Department patients who had X-rays of the ankle or foot or both over a 12-month period. RESULTS: There were 1199 ankle X-rays taken of which 193 (16%) showed a significant fracture. There were 1081 patients who had a foot X-rayed of which 165 (15%) showed a significant fracture. Younger patients had more X-rays but older patients were more likely to have a fracture. There were 309 patients who had an ipsilateral ankle and foot X-rayed at the same time, and of these 42 (14%) showed one fracture and just two (0.6%) showed a significant fracture of both ankle and foot. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to X-raying ankle and feet in this study is probably widespread, and Ottawa Ankle Rules still seem to be of limited use in diagnosing fractures. This low yield of positive X-ray could be accepted or a more sophisticated ankle rule introduced.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Foot Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Age Factors , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Humans , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Unnecessary Procedures , Weight-Bearing , X-Rays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...