New-onset myasthenia gravis after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that targets acetylcholine receptor (AChR) of the neuromuscular junction. New-onset MG after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has rarely been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We report about three patients who presented new-onset myasthenia gravis after receiving mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The patients were all males and older than 55 years. All the patients presented with ocular and bulbar symptoms. The interval between vaccine administration and MG onset ranged from 3 days after the first dose to 10 days after the second dose. All the patients had elevated serum AChR antibodies and responded to pyridostigmine. Two out of three patients were successfully treated with IVIG or plasma exchange and with long-term immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: MG is a rare disease; clinicians should be aware of possible new-onset MG after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially with the current recommendation of booster doses. The hyperstimulation of the innate immune system or the exacerbation of a subclinical pre-existing MG could be possible explanations.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity can be misdiagnosed by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity scale.

The assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is still uncertain as several of the most frequently used scales do not rely on a formal neurological evaluation and depend on patients' reports and examiners' interpretations. The aim of this study was to compare the assessment of CIPN using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) scale and a formal neurological assessment scored with the Total Neuropathy Score (TNS, i.e., a composite scale designed to grade the impairment in neuropathy patients) to identify possible discrepancies in the diagnosis. In this prospective study, 155 patients treated with cisplatin/carboplatin or with paclitaxel/docetaxel and CIPN were examined in a collaborative oncological/neurological multi-center trial using the NCI-CTC scale and the TNS; the results were then extensively compared. We evidenced that the TNS allows possible misdiagnosed neuropathies to be revealed. In fact, the NCI-CTC evaluation performed by experienced examiners overestimated the occurrence of motor neuropathy, possibly because of the presence of confounding factors (e.g., fatigue, depression, cachexia), which might be difficult to be ruled out without a formal neurological examination. This study strongly indicates that a more formal neurological assessment of patients with CIPN than that achievable with the common toxicity scales (e.g., NCI-CTC) is advisable.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.

OPINION STATEMENT: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of the most severe and unpredictable side effects of modern anticancer treatment. In recent years, a clear understanding of the importance of an integrated approach to CIPN has become evident, and efforts are increasing to better characterize its features and to identify more accurate methods to report and grade its occurrence. The clinically relevant impact of CIPN on cancer patients has been known for a long time, but knowledge of its pathogenetic aspects is still very limited. This incomplete knowledge is one of the major limitations in identifying targets for evidence-based neuroprotective strategies. Nevertheless, several studies have been devoted to the prevention or at least the effective treatment of symptoms secondary to peripheral nerve damage and to the early identification of patients at high risk of developing severe CIPN. Unfortunately, none of these studies has been successful and the optimal management of CIPN patients is still an unmet clinical need. Therefore, the modification of chemotherapy is currently the only available approach to limit the severity of neuropathy in the vast majority of patients. The indications for treatment modification are not universally accepted and they can differ among the various drugs. Generally, treatment modification should be considered as soon as symptoms and signs impair the daily life activities of the patient, but the possibility of a delayed worsening of CIPN after treatment withdrawal ("coasting") should always be considered, and delay of modification decisions should be avoided.

The Total Neuropathy Score as an assessment tool for grading the course of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: comparison with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Scale.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a major side effect of several antineoplastic drugs. However, despite its clinical importance, there is no agreement as to the best way to assess the severity and changes in CIPN. We have previously demonstrated a correlation between the severity of CIPN, assessed using the Total Neuropathy Score (TNS) or its reduced versions, and several common toxicity scales. In this study, we investigated two series of patients (total number = 173) who were evaluated at baseline and during chemotherapy with the TNS (n= 122) or the TNSc (the TNS version based exclusively on the clinical evaluation of the patients, n= 51) and with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) 2.0, with the aim of comparing the sensitivity to the changes in CIPN severity. In both series, the TNS and the TNSc had a significant correlation with the NCI-CTC in scoring the severity of CIPN, confirming the results of previous studies. Moreover, both the TNS and the TNSc showed a higher sensitivity to CIPN changes. We, therefore, propose the TNSc as a reliable method for assessing not only the severity but also the changes in CIPN.