[Learning from errors after a care-related adverse event]. / Apprendre de ses erreurs après un événement indésirable associé aux soins.

The mobilisation of all health professionals with regard to the detection and analysis of care-related adverse events is an essential element in the improvement of the safety of care. This approach is required by the authorities and justifiably expected by users.

[Improving patient safety: decreasing adverse events associated with medical care]. / Amélioration de la sécurité des patients: réduction des événements indésirables liés aux soins.

Awareness of the importance of what were previously called iatrogenic accidents is not new, but recent publications have demonstrated the frequency and severity of the accidents and incidents associated with care, which are now known simply as "adverse events". Research has helped us to understand the principal mechanisms underlying them and the circumstances that promote them. It shows that root causes, often linked to the organization of care, should be sought beneath the initial appearance of mistakes. Institutions providing health care must ascertain how to develop a new culture that makes it possible to improve patient safety by implementing new policies, that is, a group of several coordinated measures intended to decrease patient risk. These policies should use accepted techniques, such as reports and appropriate information management for events for which reporting is mandatory, but extended to medical accidents; critical activity analyses must also be used, for comparison with a standard, following the model used for evaluations of professional practices. New techniques are also necessary, such as operational feedback in the form of morbidity-mortality reviews and in-depth analyses of the most serious events. Institutions must establish indicators to prove the effectiveness of this new policy.

Highly sensitive and efficient computer-assisted system for routine surveillance for surgical site infection.

OBJECTIVES: Surveillance of surgical site infections (SSIs) is effective in reducing the rates of these complications, but it is extremely time-consuming and, consequently, underused. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of a computer-assisted surveillance system, compared with a conventional method involving review of medical records, and the time saved with the computer-assisted system. METHOD: A prospective study was conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2001. With the computer-assisted method, screening for SSIs relied on identification in the laboratory database of positive results of microbiological tests of surgical-site specimens; confirmation was obtained via computer-generated questionnaires completed by the surgeon in charge of the patient. In the conventional method, SSIs were identified by exhaustive chart review. The time spent on surveillance was recorded for both methods. SETTING: A 25-bed gastrointestinal surgery unit in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 766 consecutive patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the computer-assisted method was 84.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.94); the specificity was 99.9%. For the 807 surgical procedures in the study, 197 had an SSI identified by culture of a surgical-site specimen. After elimination of 63 duplicate cultures with positive results, 134 questionnaires were sent to the surgeons, who confirmed 27 SSIs. The conventional method identified 32 SSIs. The computer-assisted method required 60% less time than the conventional method (90 hours vs 223 hours). CONCLUSION: Surveillance for SSIs using computer-assisted, laboratory-based screening and case confirmation by surgeons is as efficient as and far less time-consuming than the conventional method of chart review. This method permits routine surveillance for SSIs with reliable accuracy.

[Avoidable hospital drug prescription in the elderly. A review of the literature]. / Iatrogénie médicamenteuse hospitalière évitable et personnes âgées.

Elderly persons are particularly exposed to drug reactions, especially drug interactions subsequent to multiple prescriptions. It is also recognized that the drug risk is the leading hospital risk involving 1 to 10% of all hospitalized patients. An analysis of the avoidable nature of drug reactions leads to consideration of a sequence of 4 events leading to drug exposure: prescription, delivery, administration and compliance. Each event in this sequence corresponds to a distinct person: physician, pharmacist, nurse, patient. This suggests that the prevention of drug reactions in hospitalized elderly persons requires implementation of an "alert-causal attributability-avoidability-prevention" system by the healthcare teams where physicians, pharmacists, and nurses work in close coordination with the patient.