Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Tissue Res ; 353(3): 457-63, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23839241

ABSTRACT

Repair of injured tendon is a very slow process and involves the release of many molecules, including nitric oxide. We investigate the influence of local nitrergic inhibition in histological and functional recovery of injured Achilles tendon. A standard murine model of tendon injury by rupture was used. The animals were divided into three experimental groups: control, injury + vehicle (normal saline) and injury + Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). The products were injected into the paratendinous region every 2 days and body weight gain and Achilles functional index (AFI) were evaluated on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 after tendon injury. On day 21 post-injury, the animals were killed to evaluate nitric oxide production and tissue organization. We observed that tendon surgical division led to increased tissue nitrite levels, which were reduced in L-NAME-treated rats. The AFI revealed functional recovery of L-NAME-treated animals on day 21 post-injury, which was not observed in the saline-treated group. Microscopic analysis of hematoxylin-eosin staining and collagen autofluorescence showed that L-NAME-treated rats had more aligned areas of collagen fibers and that the diameter of newly organized collagen in this group was also greater than that in the vehicle-treated one. We demonstrate that local treatment with L-NAME significantly improves the functional parameters and accelerates histomorphological recovery.


Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester/pharmacology , Nitric Oxide Synthase/antagonists & inhibitors , Nitric Oxide Synthase/metabolism , Recovery of Function/physiology , Achilles Tendon/enzymology , Achilles Tendon/injuries , Achilles Tendon/pathology , Animals , Collagen/biosynthesis , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Recovery of Function/drug effects , Tenotomy
2.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 109(3): 203-7, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21496211

ABSTRACT

Adenosinergic systems have been implicated in anxiety-like states, as caffeine can induce a state of anxiety in human beings. Caffeine is an antagonist at A(1) and A(2) adenosine receptors but it remains unclear whether anxiety is mediated by one or both of these. As the adenosinergic system is rather conserved, we opted to pursue these questions using zebrafish, a widely used model organism in genetics and developmental biology. Zebrafish adenosine 1. 2A.1 and 2A.2 receptors conserve histidine residues in TM6 and TM7 that are responsible for affinity in bovine A1 receptor. We investigated the effects of caffeine, PACPX (an A(1) receptor antagonist) and 1,3-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX) (an A(2) receptor antagonist) on anxiety-like behaviour and locomotor activity of zebrafish in the scototaxis test as well as evaluated the effects of these drugs on pigment aggregation. Caffeine increased anxiety at the dose of 100 mg/kg, while locomotion at the dose of 10 mg/kg was increased. Both doses of 10 and 100 mg/kg induced pigment aggregation. PACPX, on the other hand, increased anxiety at a dose of 6 mg/kg and induced pigment aggregation at the doses of 0.6 and 6 mg/kg, but did not produce a locomotor effect. DMPX, in turn, increased locomotion at the dose of 6 mg/kg but did not produce any effect on pigment aggregation or anxiety-like behaviour. These results indicate that blockade of A(1)-R, but not A(2)-R, induces anxiety and autonomic arousal, while the blockade of A(2)-R induces hyperlocomotion. Thus, as in rodents, caffeine's anxiogenic and arousing effects are probably mediated by A(1) receptors in zebrafish and its locomotor activating effect is probably mediated by A(2) receptors.


Subject(s)
Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Anxiety/chemically induced , Arousal/drug effects , Caffeine/pharmacology , Receptor, Adenosine A1/physiology , Zebrafish/metabolism , Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Animals , Anxiety/metabolism , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Cattle , Darkness , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Melanophores/metabolism , Mice , Molecular Sequence Data , Motor Activity/drug effects , Pigments, Biological/metabolism , Receptor, Adenosine A1/metabolism , Receptors, Adenosine A2/metabolism , Receptors, Adenosine A2/physiology , Sequence Alignment
3.
Pharmacol Res ; 60(4): 212-20, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19446469

ABSTRACT

Mercury compounds versatility explains their numerous applications in diverse areas of industry. The growing use of this metal has resulted in a significant increase of environment contamination and episodes of human intoxication, arousing the concern of international organisms. Meanwhile, consequences of these intoxication outbreaks are still not fully understood, especially if we consider long-term effects of chronic exposure to relatively low levels of mercury compounds. In the present manuscript, studies about the genotoxicity of mercury compounds, performed in vitro, in vivo, and/or including epidemiologic studies of human populations were reviewed. Some mercury compounds are known as teratogenic agents, especially affecting the normal development of the central nervous system; however, the connection between mercury exposure and carcinogenesis remains controversial. Since 1990s, epidemiological studies have begun to include an increasing number of human subjects, making the results more reliable: thus, increased genotoxicity was demonstrated in human populations exposed to mercury through diet, occupation or by carrying dental fillings. In fact, concentrations of methylmercury causing significant genotoxic alterations in vitro below both safety limit and concentration were associated with delayed psychomotor development with minimal signs of methylmercury poisoning. Based on mercury's known ability to bind sulfhydryl groups, several hypotheses were raised about potential molecular mechanisms for the metal genotoxicity. Mercury may be involved in four main processes that lead to genotoxicity: generation of free radicals and oxidative stress, action on microtubules, influence on DNA repair mechanisms and direct interaction with DNA molecules. All data reviewed here contributed to a better knowledge of the widespread concern about the safety limits of mercury exposure.


Subject(s)
Mercury/adverse effects , Mercury/metabolism , Mutagens/adverse effects , Animals , Carcinogens/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Humans , Mutagens/metabolism , Oxidative Stress , Teratogens/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...