Patellar resurfacing might not be mandatory in contralateral second total knee replacement even if performed during replacement of the first knee.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriateness or necessity of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and functional results of patients with bilateral involvement, operated on in one knee by TKA with patellar resurfacing and in the other knee by TKA without resurfacing. The hypothesis was that there was no difference in results between the two sides. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort of patients operated on by TKA without patellar resurfacing in a second osteoarthritic knee after contralateral TKA with patellar resurfacing. Twenty consecutive patients who underwent second primary TKA constituted their own control group (40 knees). Iwano scores were comparable. Mean age was 75.9±6.2years. Mean time between the two procedures was 20.6±11.9months. RESULTS: There were no differences in SF-36, KOOS or Lille patellofemoral scores between the right and left knees. Sixty-five percent of patients were unable to differentiate the performance of their knees in activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The present study did not differentiate results according to patellar resurfacing, showing the limitations of resurfacing for early functional gain after primary TKA. Resurfacing might thus not be essential, even if it was performed in replacement of the first knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort study.

Ligamentoplasty with interposition of the proximal interphalangeal joint in the treatment of unicondylar osteochondral defects: a cadaveric feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint are common and complex. However, the treatment of osteochondral defects of the head of the proximal phalanx has rarely been described. Herein, we propose a new technique for the management of unicondylar defects of the proximal phalanx that can restore joint amplitudes and provide PIP stability. METHODS: In this cadaveric feasibility study, unicondylar defects were generated using striking wedges and chisels. First, a transverse tunnel measuring 2 mm in diameter passing through the head of the proximal phalanx was made. A second tunnel at the base of the middle phalanx with the same diameter was then created. The hemitendon of the flexor carpi radialis graft was passed through each of these tunnels. The proximal end of the graft was interposed in the area with a loss of bone substance. The ligamentoplasty was then tensed and fixed by two anchors on the proximal phalanx. Joint amplitudes and frontal stability were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no significant change in the joint's range of motion: preoperatively, the mean mobility arcs were -2° to 113.80°, and they were -2° to 110° after the procedure (P=0.999). There was no significant difference in joint stability (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ligamentoplasty with PIP interposition appears to be a possible solution for the management of unicondylar defects of the proximal phalanx. An evaluation of clinical results is planned in order to definitively confirm the validity of this procedure.

Implementation and results of an enhanced recovery (fast-track) program in total knee replacement patients at a French university hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries, "fast-track" or enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are being developed, but their impact on care pathway quality and safety has not been fully explored in the French literature. The present study aimed to compare results in TKR between fast-track and conventional pathways, addressing the following questions: (1) Are 90-day rates of complications, readmission and surgical revision higher with fast-track? (2) Is mean length of stay (LoS) shorter with fast-track? (3) Are postoperative pain and clinical results improved by fast-track? And, (4) are patients and care staff satisfied with these new programs? HYPOTHESIS: Implementing fast-track for TKR in a university hospital center is beneficial for the patient and does not impair the quality and safety of care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A case-control study was performed using a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A fast-track program was implemented for TKR by modifying the care pathway. This involved instituting a therapeutic education consultation, optimizing blood sparing, modifying surgical practices, and hastening early mobilization thus actively involving patients in their own management. Between January 2017 and January 2019, 216 patients with a mean age of 69.23±7.80years and mean BMI of 30.15±4.79kg/m2 were included in the fast-track group, with 335 matched patients included in the conventional group. RESULTS: At 90days, there were no significant inter-group differences in rates of infection (fast-track=1.39%, conventional=0.90%; p=0.34), readmission (fast-track=3.24%, conventional=3.58%; p=0.49), or surgical revision (fast-track=2.78%, conventional=2.69%; p=0.298). The visual analog scale (VAS) pain rating was 1.56±1.36 in the fast-track group versus 5±2.41 in the conventional group; p<0.001. LoS was 3.17±1.59days in fast-track versus 7.25±1.85days in the conventional group; p<0.001. Ninety-five percent of patients and 96% of care staff were satisfied with the fast-track program. DISCUSSION: Fast-track implementation ensured quality and safety of care; it did not increase the rate of complications in primary TKR. Mean length of stay was drastically reduced. Both patients and care staff were very satisfied with these new procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Functional outcome of osteochondral autograft is equivalent in stable knee and in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are associated in 10% to 20% of cases with extensive traumatic focal osteochondral damage. Ligament reconstruction may require osteochondral autograft for symptomatic osteochondral lesions. Combined ACL and chondral or osteochondral reconstruction is poorly evaluated in the literature; osteochondral reconstruction in stable knee better documented. The objective of this study was to compare functional results after osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) for significant symptomatic femoral condyle defect, in stable or stabilised knees (concomitant ACL reconstruction). The hypothesis was that functional results are equivalent in both groups. MATERIAL & METHOD: This was a single-centre retrospective comparative observational study of patients consecutively operated on between 2000 and 2018. Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: Group 1 (OAT+ACL, n=13) and group 2 (OAT on stable knee, n=37). The following criteria were recorded at follow-up: pain (VAS), KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scores and Hughston radiologic score, and time to return to sport. Mean follow-up was 79.7±60 months in group 1 and 86.4±62 months in group 2. RESULTS: Ten patients were included for analysis in group 1 and 30 in group 2. Cartilage lesion size was comparable between groups: 1.6±1.20 cm2 for group 1 and 2.3±1.3 cm2 for group 2 (ns). One complication (infection with favourable course) was observed in group 2. Sport was resumed at 8.7±2.7 vs. 8.4±3.3 months, respectively. Mean subjective scores were respectively 83.3±7.4 and 75.4±14 for Lysholm, 89.7±7.8 and 89.7±19.6 for KOOS, 78±13.7 and 72.2±12.9 for subjective IKDC, 0.5±0.5 and 0.8±0.9 for pain on VAS and 3 and 3 for radiological Hughston radiologic score, with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic focal osteochondral lesions treated by osteochondral autograft transfer gives the same outcome on stable or stabilised knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Total wrist denervation: Retrospective study of 39 wrists with 56 months' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyze patient satisfaction after total wrist denervation. HYPOTHESIS: Total wrist denervation provides reliable and durable results. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A single-center multi-surgeon retrospective study included a cohort of 39 wrists. Mean age was 58 years. The dominant side was operated on in two-thirds of cases. SLAC wrist and SNAC wrist accounted for 41% of etiologies. All patients were seen again in consultation and were evaluated for pain, strength, mobility and limb function. Failure was defined as any reoperation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 56 months, with no loss to follow-up. Pain improved in 79.5% of cases. Median DASH score was 27.27. Strength on Jamar® dynamometer improved from 60% to 75% compared to the contralateral side (p=0.012). Range of motion improved by 5° (p=0.052). At last follow-up, 31% of patients showed aggravation of radiological osteoarthritis. There were 4 revision procedures (total wrist fusion), and 4 complications. DISCUSSION: The present results were comparable to those in the literature in terms of satisfaction, functional scores and number of complications and revision procedures. Total wrist denervation is a reliable and reproducible surgical technique in terms of pain relief preservation of function in painful osteoarthritic wrists. It thus has an essential place in the therapeutic algorithm of patients presenting with chronic pain in a wrist that is still mobile, whatever the initial etiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective cohort.