Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Avian Dis ; 51(1 Suppl): 408-13, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17494595

ABSTRACT

Prevalence of avian influenza infection in free-range mule ducks (a cross between Muscovy [Cairina moschata domesticus] and Pekin ducks [Anas platyrhychos domesticus]) is a matter of concern and deserves particular attention. Thus, cloacal swabs were collected blindly from 30 targeted mule flocks at 4, 8, and 12 wk of age between October 2004 and January 2005. They were stored until selection. On the basis of a positive H5 antibody detection at 12 wk of age with the use of four H5 antigens, the samples from eight flocks were selectively analyzed. Positive samples were first screened with a matrix gene-based real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay before virus isolation. Eight avian influenza subtypes (H5N1, H5N2, H5N3, H6N2, H6N8, and H11N9) and three avian paramyxovirus type 1 viruses were isolated. All 11 are characterized as low pathogenicity (LP) and avirulent, respectively, by in vivo tests and, when relevant, nucleotide sequencing of the hemagglutinin (or fusion [F]) protein cleavage site. Regarding H5 isolates, all of their eight genes belong to the avian lineage and some particular genetic traits were determined. H5 genes were fully sequenced and phylogenetically analyzed; they all belong to the Eurasian lineage, lack additional glycosylation sites, and do not cluster, suggesting separate introductions from the wild reservoir. None were grouped with the Asian isolates. The N1 gene (H5N1 isolate) was very close genetically to an Italian LP-H7N1 gene. Antigenic relationships between these H5 isolates and others were assessed comparatively by crossed hemagglutination inhibition tests. All these data are very useful to control the evolution of H5 viruses at the genetic and antigenic level to better understand the source of new outbreaks (new introductions from wild birds or the result of spread among poultry) and to assess the immunity afforded by available vaccines. These data are useful also to update antigens for avian influenza survey and to choose the most suitable vaccine in the case of preventive vaccination of ducks.


Subject(s)
Ducks/virology , Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza in Birds/virology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/genetics , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus/metabolism , Influenza A virus/metabolism , Phylogeny , Risk Factors
2.
Prev Vet Med ; 71(1-2): 91-103, 2005 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16102859

ABSTRACT

In France, the regular and compulsory detection of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) in flocks of breeding and laying hens is based on bacteriological examination of environmental swabs and faeces samples. The aim of this study was to compare this bacteriological examination with a serological method (ELISA) developed in our laboratory. This ELISA was first evaluated by use of artificially infected hens. During these experimental infection studies, several groups of hens were inoculated with SE, ST, different vaccines and different Salmonella serovars to calculate the experimental parameters of our ELISA. Then, in a field study, 43 flocks were followed monthly using two bacteriological samples (environmental swab and pool of faeces) and 20 serological samples (sera or yolks). Twenty-seven flocks without SE or ST gave a negative serological response throughout their surveillance. Among the 10 various serovars different from SE and ST isolated in this study, S. Heidelberg, S. Agona and S. Hadar gave seropositive results in seven flocks. Consequently, this ELISA was not specific of SE and ST as it detected serovars sharing or not common antigens with SE and ST. Seropositive results were also obtained each month for two flocks where no Salmonella could be isolated. Finally, in seven flocks found infected with SE or ST, the positive ELISA results appeared later than the bacteriological detection. Therefore, for the detection of chicken flocks recently infected with SE or ST, bacteriological examination currently used in France seems to be more appropriate than this ELISA.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella enteritidis/isolation & purification , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , France/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/diagnosis , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella enteritidis/immunology , Salmonella typhimurium/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 440: 729-34, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9782351

ABSTRACT

We have sequenced that part of the spike protein (S) gene which encodes the aminoterminal and most variable quarter (hypervariable region, HVR) of the S1 subunit of 28 isolates of the 793/B (also known as CR88 and 4/91) serotype of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and the whole of S1 for nine of them. The isolates were from France and Britain between the years 1985 (first isolation) and 1996. The maximum nucleotide and amino acid differences between the first isolate and the others were 4.1% and 7.6%, respectively, for the whole of S1 and 7.1% and 14.6%, respectively, in the HVR. Analysis within clearly recognisable subgroups suggested that even in the HVR the nucleotide mutation rate was only 0.3 to 0.6% per year. However, there was no evidence that mutations had become fixed in a progressive manner; this serotype did not appear to be evolving. Strains isolated several years apart could be more similar than those isolated in a given year. It is likely that the amino acid changes are largely at positions where amino acid differences are tolerated rather than as a consequence of immune pressure. Reasons for this conclusion are discussed.


Subject(s)
Infectious bronchitis virus/genetics , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , Animals , Sequence Analysis , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
4.
J Virol ; 72(11): 9278-85, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9765475

ABSTRACT

A detailed map of the transcriptional organization of the CELO virus genome was produced. Recent computer analysis of CELO virus has indicated the presence of 38 putative open reading frames (ORFs). This study, based on analysis of the transcriptional products of CELO in vitro, confirmed the presence of RNAs for 26 of these 38 ORFs. All of the results were obtained by cDNA isolation or specific reverse transcriptase PCR. Observation of ORF transcription kinetics postinfection revealed the existence of early and late expression, with the earliest starting at 2 h postinfection. The 5' untranslated regions of some RNAs were also studied, and this revealed the existence of a bipartite leader sequence, comparable in structure to the tripartite leader of mastadenovirus. The leader most probably involved in transcriptional activity was observed in most of the structural protein genes of the CELO virus genome. This suggests some homology in transcriptional organization between the avian adenovirus CELO and known mastadenoviruses such as human adenovirus.


Subject(s)
Aviadenovirus/genetics , Genome, Viral , Adenoviridae Infections/virology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Chick Embryo , Chromosome Mapping , DNA, Complementary/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , Gene Expression , Humans , Mastadenovirus/genetics , Open Reading Frames , Plasmids/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA, Viral/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Transfection , beta-Galactosidase/genetics
5.
Rev Sci Tech ; 16(1): 79-82, 1997 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9537744

ABSTRACT

Poultry products contaminated with pathogenic strains of Newcastle disease virus are a source of virus transmission to susceptible poultry flocks. The probability of contamination varies according to the type of product. Research conducted by various laboratories in Europe has shown that pathogenic virus can be isolated from the carcasses of chickens, whether vaccinated or not, during a brief period after experimental infection. Eggs laid by hens infected with Newcastle disease virus present a very low risk. Furthermore, feathers, bones, blood and offal present potential risks if they are incorporated in poultry feed. Finally, poultry droppings used as a fertiliser can present a major risk of infection in certain circumstances.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/virology , Chickens , Newcastle Disease/transmission , Newcastle disease virus/physiology , Poultry Products/virology , Animals , Bone and Bones/virology , Eggs/virology , Feathers/virology , Feces/virology , Poultry , Waste Products
7.
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B ; 39(9): 683-91, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1337234

ABSTRACT

Six isolates originating from acute outbreaks of infectious bursal disease recently reported in broiler and pullet flocks in France were studied with respect to their pathogenicity and their antigenic relatedness to the Faragher 52/70 reference strain. Although the mortality experimentally induced in susceptible chickens by the field strains was sometimes four times higher than that which followed the inoculation of the reference strain (16 to 48% versus 12%), neither mortality nor morbidity were observed in chickens previously vaccinated with a commercial live vaccine and then challenged under the same conditions. Agar gel precipitation tests demonstrated the existence of common antigens in the different strains, and high cross-neutralization indices measured in embryonated specific pathogen free eggs showed them all to belong to serotype I. These data are discussed with reference to previous European and North-American studies on the antigenic status of infectious bursal disease virus.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Infectious bursal disease virus/pathogenicity , Reoviridae Infections/microbiology , Acute Disease , Animals , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Female , France/epidemiology , Infectious bursal disease virus/immunology , Male , Reoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , Vaccination/veterinary
8.
Dev Biol Stand ; 79: 147-52, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1337527

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to check the safety of commercially available infectious bursal disease (IBD) vaccines in terms of bursal damage, and their immunodepressive effects as evaluated by testing the birds after vaccination for their response to Newcastle disease vaccination. Further requirements are proposed to establish a suitable safety standard.


Subject(s)
Infectious bursal disease virus/immunology , Viral Vaccines/standards , Animals , Bursa of Fabricius/immunology , Bursa of Fabricius/pathology , Chickens , Immune Tolerance , Infectious bursal disease virus/pathogenicity , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Reoviridae Infections/prevention & control , Reoviridae Infections/veterinary , Safety , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , Virulence
10.
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis ; 10(3-4): 173-86, 1987.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2827947

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the isolation and identification of a duck plague virus (DP) and a paramyxovirus (PMV6), from the livers and intestines collected in 4-month old mule ducks, under fattening, exhibiting 75% mortality and necrotic-haemorrhagic gross lesions. These viruses were isolated in specific pathogen free (SPF) muscovy duck eggs and SPF chicken eggs respectively. Then the DP virus was adapted to duck and chicken fibroblasts. The disease was reproduced in 2-week old SPF muscovy ducklings, intramuscularly inoculated with the previous organs, as well as in contact ducks. From them, only the DP virus was isolated again. Experimentally the intramuscular inoculation of the duck plague French vaccinal strain, 4 h post contact, did not prevent the disease and did not decrease its severity. Regarding the DP virus, the typical signs and lesions observed in experimentally infected muscovy ducks as well as the presence of intranuclear inclusions of the epithelial cells of their oesophagus, intestines, bursa of Fabricius and liver on the one hand, and on the other hand, of the epithelial cells of the duck egg chorio-allantoic membrane and fibroblasts inoculated with the samples first defined, allowed the characterization of the virus. Direct electron microscopy, as well as the results of seroneutralization tests with different specific avian Herpes virus antisera confirmed the DP virus identification. Moreover the DP isolate was not antigenically different from the serotype actually known. The haemagglutinating virus (PMV6) was characterized by direct electron microscopy as well as with 18 specific avian Myxovirus antisera; its identification was confirmed too by the specific seroconversion observed 4 weeks post-inoculation of this virus, in 11 weeks old SPF muscovy ducklings. Finally an assay was carried out to appreciate the pathogenicity of theses viruses inoculated either separately or associated. It showed the high pathogenicity of the DP strain. The PMV6 was apathogenic and no synergic effect with the DP virus was demonstrated. It appears to be the first isolation of PMV6 in France, to our knowledge. The epidemiological circumstances related to theses isolations are discussed. The failure of the emergency vaccination in contact ducks, might be attributed to the high virulence of the DP strain.


Subject(s)
Ducks/microbiology , Enteritis/veterinary , Herpesviridae Infections/veterinary , Herpesviridae/isolation & purification , Paramyxoviridae/isolation & purification , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Respirovirus Infections/veterinary , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Chick Embryo , Chickens , Eggs , Enteritis/microbiology , Fibroblasts , Herpesviridae/classification , Herpesviridae/pathogenicity , Herpesviridae Infections/microbiology , Intestines/microbiology , Liver/microbiology , Respirovirus Infections/microbiology , Virus Cultivation
11.
Avian Pathol ; 15(3): 367-83, 1986.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18766539

ABSTRACT

Virological 1 examination of a severe infectious bronchitis (IB)-like field case in laying hens, led to the isolation of a coronavirus antigenically different from Massachusetts, Connecticut and four Dutch IB variant strains. The virulence of the isolate for the fowl, and its dual tropism for the respiratory and genital tracts were demonstrated. In preliminary cross-protection studies Commercial vaccines did not protect against challenge with this isolate. These points and the possible economic significance of the virus are discussed.

12.
Appl Opt ; 25(15): 2470-1, 1986 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20453969
13.
Appl Opt ; 24(24): 4435, 1985 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18224224
14.
Avian Pathol ; 11(1): 39-48, 1982.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18770171

ABSTRACT

The safety spreading properties and potency of three commercial vaccines used for the prevention of avian infectious laryngotracheitis have been studied. Results showed that the different strains are not safe when administrated by the intratracheal route; when administrated by the ocular route, the vaccinal reaction was limited to a transitory conjunctivitis. Under certain conditions of proximity the vaccine viruses spread from vaccinated to contact chickens. Good protection was afforded by vaccination by ocular route, but not when the vaccines were administrated in the drinking water. There was concordance between the level of protection following vaccination and the neutralising antibodies titres. The protection was relatively short-lived: 10 to 15 weeks after vaccination, half of challenged birds showed clinical signs of the disease, and 20 weeks after vaccination all of them were sick.

16.
Avian Pathol ; 7(1): 15-27, 1978 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18770356

ABSTRACT

One-day-old chicks, with or without maternal antibodies against Newcastle disease, were vaccinated by different methods: one group received a live vaccine (Hitchner B1 strain), the second group an oil-adjuvant vaccine, and the third group both vaccines simultaneously. The serological response and the protection of the chicks against challenge were evaluated regularly up to 80 days of age. The best results were obtained when using both vaccines, which induced a good level of protection against the challenge virus strain.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...