Reasons for stopping Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A retrospective study to improve future patient selection.

To improve the prognosis and maintain quality of life in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), a novel treatment has been introduced-pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). The majority of teams propose at least 3 PIPAC procedures. However, for many patients PIPAC is stopped after only one or two procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons for stopping PIPAC after only one or two procedures and to establish a profile of poor candidates. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all patients who underwent PIPAC in three French expert centers between 2015 and 2021. A total of 268 PIPAC procedures were performed in 89 patients. Of them, 48.3% of patients underwent fewer than three procedures: 28.1% had one, 20.2% two and 51.7% three or more PIPAC procedures. The main reason for stopping PIPAC, regardless of the number of procedures, was disease progression, in 55.8% of cases. Other reasons for stopping PIPAC were non-access to the abdominal cavity (7.9%), conversion to cytoreductive surgery (13.5%), post-PIPAC adverse events (7.9%), patients' wishes (10.1%) and death (2.2%). In univariate analysis, patients who received fewer than three PIPACs less frequently had chemotherapy beforehand (91% vs 100%, p = 0.05), less frequently had bimodal treatment (70% vs 87%, p = 0.04), had more ascites (median 80 ml vs 50 ml, p = 0.05) and more frequently had carcinomatosic ascites (48.8% vs 23.9%, p < 0.01). Performing PIPAC alone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with ascites should be avoided.

Effectiveness of a digital telemonitoring platform for cancer care of older patients: The ConnectElderlyPatientToDoctor study.

While telemedicine has been shown to improve the quality of care for cancer patients, it remains underused for older patients (OP), partly due to the assumption that OPs are unabled or unwilling to use digital tools. However, more than 50% of new cancers are diagnosed in people over 70. The ConnectElderlyPatientToDoctor study aimed to evaluate the OP compliance with the use of the digital telemonitoring platform Cureety in oncology. All cancer patients followed at the Military Hospital Bégin were eligible for the study. Patients were invited to respond to a symptomatology questionnaire personalized to their pathology and treatment. An algorithm evaluated the health status of the patient based on the reported adverse events. The population was divided into two groups, OP and younger patients (YP), based on a cut-off at 70 years. The primary endpoint was to assess the compliance of OPs with the use of the digital oncology platform Cureety, compared to YP. From July 2020 to September 2021, a total of 117 patients were included in our study. We found that 66% of the patients were compliant, with no difference between the two groups (71.2% of YP, 61.7% of OP, P = .29). In OPs, progression free survival (PFS) ratio at 6-months was 64.6% in the tolerant patients vs 23.4% in the nontolerant patients (HR = 0.1980, 95% CI = 0.04431-0.8845, P = .0339). The median PFS was 23.3 months in the tolerant group vs 3.3 months in the nontolerant group (P = .0339). The data of overall survival are immature. OPs had a clear benefit from using this platform, similar to what was observed for YP. Patients felt less isolated and felt that they benefited from personalized care with early ambulatory medical care of adverse events. We also found that the health indicators collected with the platform in the first month of treatment are predictive of the progression of the disease. This solution makes it possible to streamline and improve the care pathway of OP.

Prognostic factors of toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer patients: The ToxImmune study.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy alone or in combination has clearly improved the survival of patients with lung cancer. However, it may also be responsible for adverse events impacting these patients' quality of life. The ToxImmune study aims to identify prognostic factors that can help to predict immune-related adverse events. METHODS: We included all patients aged 18 years and older who had received at least one dose of immune checkpoint inhibitors, with or without other therapy, between June 2015 and December 2020 and were diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer or small-cell lung cancer. Patients' baseline demographic characteristics, biological blood markers, and imaging by PET-scanner were collected from electronic medical records. All adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs) were recorded (Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events V.5.0). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included, of whom 60 (94%) presented at least one irAE. The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 and grade 3-4 was 34% and 8% respectively. Female sex, Primitive Tumor Standardized Uptake Value Max (SUVmax) <5, number of metastases ≥3 and immunotherapy received after the first line were found to be significant risk factors for immune-related adverse events. Based on the number of risk factors, the ToxImmune score predicts the risk of having a grade ≥2 adverse event (primitive tumor SUV ≥ 5 = 0 vs. primitive tumor SUV <5 = 1, number of metastases <3 = 0 vs. number of metastases ≥3 = 1 and L1 = 0 vs. L1 ≥ 1). The incidence of grade ≥2 adverse events was 20%, 55% and 90% with ToxImmune scores 0, 1 and = 2 respectively (p = .003). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 19.2 months, 6.64 months and 2.63 months for ToxImmune scores 0, 1 and = 2 respectively, p = .13. Median overall survival times were 22.6 months, 16.4 months and 9.8 months for ToxImmune scores 0, 1 and ≥2 respectively, p = .24. The disease control rate (DRR) was 78% in ToxIummune score 0 group, and 50% in ToxImmune score 1 and ≥2 groups (p = .363). CONCLUSION: The ToxImmune score, which is grounded on objective clinical parameters, indicates that cases with a high score had an advanced threat of severe adverse events. The ToxImmune score could therefore be used in clinical practice to identify patients treated for lung cancer with immunotherapy and at risk of severe AE.