Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

We describe a technical variation used to enhance intraoperative safety and efficiency in multilevel percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSFs) and mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (m-TLIFs). A review of the literature on percutaneous screw insertion techniques and related pitfalls is presented. PPSFs and m-TLIFs are increasingly used techniques in multilevel lumbar degenerative disease. Facetectomy and TLIF are usually performed before inserting ipsilateral pedicle screws. Such techniques can cause unintended violation of the pedicle and injure the dura or neural structures, particularly in multilevel cases. A literature review revealed a lack of intraoperative and fluoroscopic images detailing the technique for multilevel PPSF and m-TLIF(s) performed through tubular, expandable retractors. Thirteen patients with two- to four-level disease underwent multilevel PPSF and m-TLIF (one to four levels). The Kirschner Cage Screw (KCS) technique, consisting of early insertion of K-wires in all pedicles followed by facetectomy and m-TLIF(s) and, finally, screw insertion, was used in order to minimize the risk of dural/neural injuries. Neither CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) leaks nor nerve root injuries nor technique-related complications were encountered with a follow-up ranging from 7 to 38 months (mean 23.6). In conclusion, the KCS technique allows safe identification of the pedicles without opening the canal during m-TLIF(s). Moreover, by visualizing the K-wires inside the retractor, the surgeon can check the pedicle position during facetectomy, and screws can be introduced with a minimal risk of neural or dural injuries. We believe that the proposed technique increases the safety and ease of the procedure, particularly in multilevel cases.

Bilateral tubular minimally invasive surgery for low-dysplastic lumbosacral lytic spondylolisthesis (LDLLS): analysis of a series focusing on postoperative sagittal balance and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To report our early experience with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in low-dysplastic lumbosacral lytic spondylolisthesis (LDLLS), and to analyze the impact of surgery on postoperative spino-pelvic and sacro-pelvic parameters. METHODS: Eight patients (mean age 47.6 years) underwent MIS for LDLLS involving in all but one the L5-S1 level. VAS and ODI were used for clinical assessment. Imaging included pre-operative X-rays, CT and MRI scans. Post-operatively, all patients underwent X-rays and CT-scans. Pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS) values as well as lumbar lordosis (LL) have been derived from pre- and post-operative standard X-rays. RESULTS: Mean follow-up is 30.12 months (range 15-42). No complications related to the surgical procedure were observed. Patients reported a satisfactory clinical outcome, as demonstrated by variation in mean VAS (from 9.1 to 3.6) and ODI (from 70.50 to 28.25 %) scores. Comparison between pre- and post-operative sacro-pelvic parameters documented moderate changes, with reduction of PT and increase of SS in all but one patient. Overall sagittal balance of the spine has been evaluated using the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), obtained from post-operative X-rays. Mean value of SVA demonstrated a good sagittal balance of the spine. CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that MIS is feasible and effective for LDLLS, as witnesses by the satisfactory clinical results maintained at medium-term follow-up. We submit that TLIF is a valid option but an adequately sized and positioned interbody cage is a key factor to allow satisfactory restoration of segmental lordosis.

Subphrenic hematoma after thoracoscopic discectomy: description of a very rare adverse event and review of the literature on complications: case report.

The authors describe a very rare and previously unreported complication of thoracoscopic discectomy. Endoscopic spine surgery has evolved as a safe and effective treatment, and thoracoscopic discectomy, in particular, provides several advantages over open approaches, although it can be associated with intraoperative or postoperative complications. The most frequently observed adverse events are intercostal neuralgia, retained disc fragments, durotomies, atelectasis, extensive bleeding, and emergency conversion to open thoracotomy for vascular injuries. Even rare complications, such as chylorrhea or brain hemorrhagic infarction, have been reported. Nonetheless, a literature review did not reveal any case of postoperative intraabdominal hematoma following thoracoscopic discectomy. A 43-year-old woman, with no history of hematological or vascular disorders or thoracic surgery, underwent a right-sided thoracoscopic discectomy for T11-12 disc herniation. No apparent surgical technique-related complications were encountered, but intermittently repeated difficulties with single-lung ventilation occurred. The resultant dysventilation allowed partial right lung reexpansion, along with increased abdominal pressure. The latter induced an upward ballooning of the right diaphragm with consequent obstruction of the surgical field of view, requiring constant and continuous pressure applied to the thoracic surface of the diaphragm via a metal fan retractor and thus counteracting the increased abdominal pressure. Postoperatively, a large subdiaphragmatic hematoma originating from a bleeding right inferior phrenic artery was diagnosed and required urgent endovascular occlusion. The patient made an uneventful recovery with conservative treatment. A very rare and previously unreported complication-that is, early subdiaphragmatic hematoma after thoracoscopic discectomy-is described here. The authors submit that conversion to an open approach is safer when persistent anesthesia-related complications are encountered in thoracoscopic discectomy.