Optimized CorT Total to compare Scheimpflug vs dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging devices.

PURPOSE: To compare the manufacturer-provided measures of total corneal power (TCP) generated by Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging compared with corneal topographic astigmatism calculated on the basis of measured TCP data (CorT Total). SETTING: Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: TCP values were exported from virgin 209 eyes that underwent imaging with both the Scheimpflug (Pentacam HR) and dual Scheimpflug-Placido (Galilei G4) imaging devices to compute an optimized CorT Total. The standard deviation of the ocular residual astigmatism (ORAsd), which serves as a value describing the vectoral difference between the corneal astigmatism measure and manifest refractive cylinder at the corneal plane, was evaluated for all eyes to compare manufacturer-provided measurements vs the optimized CorT Total. RESULTS: The Scheimpflug CorT Total had the lowest ORAsd (0.306 diopter [D]; spherical equivalent [SE] 0.018) of all the parameters evaluated, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .22) from the dual Scheimpflug/Placido CorT Total (0.32 2 D; SE 0.017). For the Scheimpflug device, the CorT Total had a statistically significant lower (P < .05) ORAsd in comparison to the best measure on the device (total corneal refractive power apex zone 2 mm: 0.324 D; SE 0.021). For dual Scheimpflug/Placido measurements, the CorT Total had the lowest ORAsd (0.322 D; SE 0.017), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .43) from the lowest manufacturer-provided measure (TCP 2). CONCLUSIONS: CorT Total generated with the Scheimpflug device corresponded better with the manifest refractive cylinder than all measures of total corneal astigmatism calculated by the software from both the Scheimpflug and the dual Scheimpflug/Placido devices.

Brillouin microscopic depth-dependent analysis of corneal crosslinking performed over or under the LASIK flap.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of corneal crosslinking (CXL) performed over the laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap using the Standard CXL (S-CXL) protocol or under the flap after flap lift (flap-CXL) on regional corneal stiffness using Brillouin microscopy. SETTING: University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, and Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. DESIGN: Laboratory ex vivo experiment. METHODS: After epithelium debridement, LASIK flaps were created on intact fresh porcine eyes with a mechanical microkeratome. Then, S-CXL (riboflavin applied to the corneal surface followed by 3 mW/cm ultraviolet exposure with the flap in place for 30 minutes) or flap-CXL (riboflavin applied to the stromal bed after reflecting the flap followed by the same ultraviolet A exposure with the flap replaced) was performed. Depth profile of stiffness variation and averaged elastic modulus of anterior, middle, and posterior stroma were determined by analyzing Brillouin maps. Each eye served as its own control. RESULTS: The study was performed on 24 fresh porcine eyes. S-CXL had maximal stiffening impact in the anterior most corneal stroma within the LASIK flap (8.40 ± 0.04 GHz), whereas flap-CXL had lower maximal stiffening impact (8.22 ± 0.03 GHz) (P < .001) that occurred 249 ± 34 µm under the corneal surface. S-CXL increased longitudinal modulus by 6.69% (anterior), 0.48% (middle), and -0.91% (posterior) as compared with flap-CXL, which increased longitudinal modulus by 3.43% (anterior, P < .001), 1.23% (middle, P < .1), and -0.78% (posterior, P = .68). CONCLUSIONS: The S-CXL technique generated significantly greater stiffening effect in the anterior cornea than a modified protocol with riboflavin administration under the flap (flap-CXL). Minimal stiffening occurred in the middle or posterior cornea with either protocol.

Depth-Dependent Reduction of Biomechanical Efficacy of Contact Lens-Assisted Corneal Cross-linking Analyzed by Brillouin Microscopy.

PURPOSE: To determine the relative impact of contact lens- assisted corneal cross-linking (CACXL) and standard protocol CXL (CXL) on regional corneal stiffness using Brillouin microscopy. METHODS: CXL and CACXL were performed on 30 intact fresh porcine eyes (15 per group). Depth profile of stiffness variation and averaged elastic modulus of anterior, middle, and posterior stroma were determined by Brillouin maps. Corneas were cut into strips to conduct mechanical stress-strain tests after Brillouin microscopy to evaluate stiffness difference between CXL and CACXL. Each eye served as its own control. RESULTS: CXL had a greater impact on corneal stiffness, with a maximum increase of 5.74% compared to 3.99% for CACXL (P < .001). CXL increased longitudinal modulus by 7.8% in the anterior, 1.7% in the middle, and -0.7% in the posterior regions compared to CACXL, which increased longitudinal modulus by 5.5% in the anterior (P < .001), 1.2% in the middle (P = .15), and -0.4% in the posterior regions (P = .60). Mechanical stress-strain tests showed that at 10% strain averaged Young's modulus was 5 MPa for CXL and 2.97 MPa for CACXL (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both CACXL and standard protocol CXL induced significant corneal stiffening primarily concentrated in the anterior cornea. CACXL leads to less stiffening compared with CXL. An attenuated but continuous stiffening effect can be observed through the whole cornea for both CACXL and CXL, although CACXL has a smaller stiffness gradient. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(11):721-728.].

Corneal higher-order aberrations measurements: Comparison between Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido technology in keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the difference and agreement of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in keratoconic eyes using Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging systems. SETTING: Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective between-devices reliability and agreement study. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with keratoconus were evaluated sequentially by Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido devices. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. RESULTS: Fifty eyes from 50 patients (31 men, 19 women) were evaluated. Trefoil at 30 degrees, spherical aberration, and total RMS were significantly different between groups (P < .05), whereas trefoil at 0 degrees and total coma values were not statistically different. There was a weak positive correlation between devices for trefoil at 0 degrees (r = 0.228), and a moderate positive correlation for trefoil at 30 degrees (r = 0.473), horizontal coma (r = 0.430), and for total corneal RMS (r = 0.637). Vertical coma (r = 0.816) and spherical aberration (r = 0.874) showed a strong positive correlation. The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for absolute values were 1.963 µm for trefoil at 30 degrees, 2.449 µm for trefoil at 0 degrees, 3.530 µm for horizontal coma, 2.145 µm for vertical coma, 1.242 µm for spherical aberration, and 10.527 µm for RMS. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were found between measurements of corneal HOAs generated by Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido devices in patients with keratoconus, with generally limited correlations and wide LoA. HOAs measurements from these devices should not be considered equivalent.

Higher-order aberration measurements: Comparison between Scheimpflug and dual Scheimpflug-Placido technology in normal eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare higher order aberrations (HOAs) in normal eyes between a Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam HR) and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging system (Galilei G4). SETTING: Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Eyes screened for refractive surgery were evaluated sequentially using a Scheimpflug device and a dual Scheimpflug-Placido device. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. RESULTS: One hundred five eyes of 105 patients (44 men, 61 women) were evaluated. Total RMS, coma, and trefoil were significantly different between groups (all P < .001), while spherical aberration values were not. There was moderate correlation between devices for trefoil (r = 0.475 to 0.652), coma (r = 0.574 to 0.651), and spherical aberration (r = 0.483) and a strong correlation for total cornea RMS (r = 0.817). There was no directional bias between groups. The 95% limits of agreement for absolute values was 0.039 µm for trefoil at 30 degrees, 0.405 µm for trefoil at 0 degree, 0.553 µm for horizontal coma, 0.545 µm for vertical coma, 0.318 µm for spherical aberration, and 0.617 µm for RMS. CONCLUSIONS: A Scheimpflug imaging device and dual Scheimpflug-Placido imaging device generated statistically different values for total cornea HOAs; however, the correlation between devices was moderate to strong and there was reasonable agreement in all measures for normal eyes. Based on these findings, the devices appear functionally equivalent for clinical use, although caution is warranted for outcomes-based research protocols that report HOAs.

Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis.

PURPOSE: To identify the best metrics or combination of metrics that provide the highest predictive power between normal eyes and the clinically unaffected eye of patients with highly asymmetric keratoconus using data from a Dual Scheimpflug/Placido device. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: Combined Dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging was obtained from the Galilei G4 device (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland) in 31 clinically unaffected eyes with highly asymmetric keratoconus and 178 eyes from 178 patients with bilaterally normal corneal examinations that underwent uneventful LASIK with at least 1 year follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for 87 metrics, and logistic regression modeling was used to determine optimal variable combinations. RESULTS: No individual metric achieved an AUC greater than 0.79. A combined model consisting of 9 metrics yielded an AUC of 0.96, with 90.3% sensitivity and 92.6% specificity. Among those 9 metrics included, 5 related to corneal pachymetry: Opposite Sector Index and Anterior Height BFS Z from the anterior surface, Asphericity and Asymmetry Index, Posterior Height BFS Z, and Posterior Height BFS X from the posterior surface. The strongest variable in the model was the thinnest point location on the horizontal (x) axis. CONCLUSION: While individual metrics performed poorly, using a combination of metrics from the combined Dual Scheimpflug/Placido device provided a useful model for differentiating normal corneas from the clinically normal eyes of patients with highly asymmetric keratoconus. Pachymetry values were the most impactful metrics.