ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The clinical polymorphism of syphilis leads to diagnostic issues. We report a case of secondary syphilis revealed by skin and mucosal erosions, and responsible for sensorineural hearing loss and asymptomatic papillitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 55-year-old man presented oral and peri-anal erosions as the initial symptoms of secondary syphilis. He reported hypoacusis and a pure-tone audiogram revealed bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Ophthalmological investigation revealed isolated right papillitis and superior temporal scotoma with blind-spot enlargement. TPHA-VDRL serology was strongly positive for plasma (TPHA 1/10,240 and VDRL 1/64) but doubtful for cerebrospinal fluid. For his hearing and eye disorders, considered as related to neurosyphilis, the patient received a 14-day course of intravenous penicillin G, associated with systemic corticosteroids with gradual reduction over a period of fifteen weeks. The patient's skin and mucosal erosions resolved, as did his papillitis. His hearing loss remained stable. Serological monitoring at three months showed a sixteen-fold decrease in VDRL titre. DISCUSSION: The re-emergence of syphilis has led to increasing incidence of related ophthalmological and otological disorders. This report highlights the first-line role of the dermatologist in systematic diagnosis and in screening for associated involvement.
Subject(s)
Anus Diseases/microbiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/microbiology , Mouth Mucosa/microbiology , Papilledema/microbiology , Syphilis/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vascular thromboembolism (VTE) complicating cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary infection is increasingly reported in immunocompetent adults. No guideline is, however, currently available for the management of these infections and particularly for the antiviral therapy indication. METHODS: We performed a literature review of VTE complicating CMV primary infection in immunocompetent adults using PubMed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine case patients of VTE complicating CMV primary infection were reported. The main sites of venous thrombosis were the splanchnic veins (30 patients) or those of the lower limbs (18 patients). One-third of patients presented with pulmonary embolism (25 patients). Forty-nine patients (76%) had at least one VTE risk factor, inherited or acquired thrombophilia for 37 patients (58%), and another risk factor for 27 patients (42%). Only 11 patients received an antiviral therapy. A positive outcome was observed in all patients. CONCLUSION: We suggest that antiviral therapy should be considered for patients presenting with severe VTE, VTE with a negative outcome despite anticoagulation, severe organ involvement, or for patients managed in the intensive care unit.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Thrombosis/virology , Humans , ImmunocompetenceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the overall efficacy of new antiretroviral drugs, as well as the factors associated with increased efficacy. We compared CD4 cell count increases associated with chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) inhibitors or other new drugs, using indirect comparison. METHODS: We included RCTs published in 2003-2010 that assessed the 48-week immunological and virological efficacy of adding new antiretroviral drugs vs. placebo to optimized background therapy (OBT) in treatment-experienced subjects. These drugs included maraviroc, vicriviroc, enfuvirtide, raltegravir, etravirine, tipranavir and darunavir. We collected baseline descriptive characteristics, CD4 cell count changes and virological suppression proportions (percentage with HIV RNA <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). RESULTS: We identified 10 studies which included a total of 6401 patients. New drugs were associated with increased virological suppression (pooled odds ratio 2.97) and larger CD4 count increases (pooled nonstandardized difference 39 cells/µL) compared with placebo. OBT genotypic sensitivity scores (GSSs) were also associated with larger differences in virological suppression (P<0.001 for GSS=0,≤1 and ≤2) and CD4 cell count increase (GSS=0, P<0.001; GSS ≤1, P=0.002; GSS ≤2, P=0.015) between the two groups. CCR5 inhibitors were not associated with significant gains in CD4 cell counts (P=0.22) compared with other new drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the overall immunological and virological efficacy of new antiretroviral drugs in treatment-experienced patients, compared with placebo. The main predictive factor for efficacy was the number of fully active drugs. CCR5 inhibitors did not increase CD4 cell count to a greater extent than other new drugs.