Hematologic Malignancies Influence the Accuracy of Prediction of Survival in Patients With Solid Tumor Spinal Metastases Undergoing Surgery.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on how to identify patients with multiple-level spinal metastases who would benefit from surgery. Previous studies have revealed that patients with hematologic malignancies have a significantly longer median survival time than those with solid tumor spinal metastases. We aimed to compare predictors and survival data between patients with spinal metastases, including hematologic malignancies (all-malignancies group), with only those with nonhematologic malignancies (nonhematologic malignancies group). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included all patients age >18 years who underwent surgery to treat spinal metastases in our department from 2008 to 2018. The patients' baseline characteristics, treatment modalities, and laboratory results were analyzed. Survival was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of confirmed death. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 186 patients with a mean age of 57.1 ± 13.4 years, 101 of whom were male and 18 of whom had hematologic malignancies. The median survival time was 201 days in the all-malignancies group and 168 days in the nonhematologic malignancies group. Independent predictors of survival differed between the two groups. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status and response to preoperative chemotherapy were identified as independent factors in both groups. However, radiosensitivity and CNS metastases were identified only in the all-malignancies group, and tumor growth potential, albumin status, and number of vertebrae were identified only in the nonhematologic malignancies group. The receiver operating characteristics were comparable in the two groups: 0.75 in the all-malignancies group and 0.77 in the nonhematologic malignancies group. CONCLUSION: Longer survival in patients with hematologic malignancies influences the overall prediction of survival. Tumor-specific prognostic factors may improve the prediction of survival in patients with spinal metastases.

Predictive factors for respiratory failure and in-hospital mortality after surgery for spinal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Spinal metastasis surgeries carry substantial risk of complications. PRF is among complications that significantly increase mortality rate and length of hospital stay. The risk factor of PRF after spinal metastasis surgery has not been investigated. This study aims to identify the predictors of postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) and in-hospital death after spinal metastasis surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with spinal metastasis surgically treated between 2008 and 2018. PRF was defined as mechanical ventilator dependence > 48 h postoperatively (MVD) or unplanned postoperative intubation (UPI). Collected data include demographics, laboratory data, radiographic and operative data, and postoperative complications. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors independently associated with PRFs and in-hospital death. RESULTS: This study included 236 patients (average age 57 ± 14 years, 126 males). MVD and UPI occurred in 13 (5.5%) patients and 13 (5.5%) patients, respectively. During admission, 14 (5.9%) patients had died postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant predictors of MVD included intraoperative blood loss > 2000 mL (odds ratio [OR] 12.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.88-52.36), surgery involving cervical spine (OR 9.58, 95% CI 1.94-47.25), and ASA classification ≥ 4 (OR 6.59, 95% CI 1.85-23.42). The predictive factors of UPI included postoperative sepsis (OR 20.48, 95% CI 3.47-120.86), central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (OR 10.21, 95% CI 1.42-73.18), lung metastasis (OR 7.18, 95% CI 1.09-47.4), and postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 6.85, 95% CI 1.44-32.52). The predictive factors of in-hospital death included postoperative sepsis (OR 13.15, 95% CI 2.92-59.26), CNS metastasis (OR 10.55, 95% CI 1.54-72.05), and postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 9.87, 95% CI 2.35-41.45). CONCLUSION: PRFs and in-hospital death are not uncommon after spinal metastasis surgery. Predictive factors for PRFs included preoperative comorbidities, intraoperative massive blood loss, and postoperative complications. Identification of risk factors may help guide therapeutic decision-making and patient counseling.

Efficacy Comparison of Hyaluronic Acid and Corticosteroid Injection in Treatment of Trigger Digits: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Although the current nonsurgical treatment for trigger digits is corticosteroid (CS) injection, it often comes with adverse effects that may cause some limitations. Currently, Hyaluronic acid (HA) has been successfully used in tendinopathy and may be used in stenosing tenosynovitis. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided injection between the HA and CS in trigger digits treatment. Methods: Double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty patients with 66 trigger digits were randomly assigned into an intervention group (1 ml of low-molecular weight HA) and a control group (1 ml of 10mg/ml triamcinolone acetate). The ultrasound-guided injection and local anesthesia (0.5 ml of 1% lidocaine without adrenaline) were used. The Quinnell grading, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of pain, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and complications were collected at 1-, 3-and 6-month follow-up. Results: The mean age of HA group (33 digits) and CS group (33 digits) were 58.3 years and 54.7 years respectively. Nine patients were loss of follow-up (7 in HA group and 2 in CS group). The Quinnell grades have shown an improvement in both group. The CS group had a significant better improvement at 1-month (p-value < 0.001) and there was no significant difference at 3-and 6-month follow-up between the two groups. The median of VAS and DASH score were significantly improved by time in both groups (p-value < 0.01). The CS group showed a better significant improvement in early period of follow-up (p-value < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the last follow-up. Conclusions: HA and CS injection has a comparable therapeutic effect in treatment of trigger digits. However, CS injection has higher efficacy of pain and inflammation reduction in the early phase of the disease.