Mastoiditis in a Patient With Seizures.

A 64-year-old man with a 2-year history of seizure disorder presented to the emergency department at an outside hospital with breakthrough seizures. What is your diagnosis?

The parietal notch (Brammer's pointer): Accuracy of a surface landmark for temporal bone surgery.

Hypothesis: The parietal notch is a reliable surface landmark of the sigmoid sinus at the sinodural angle. Background: Currently no surface landmark approximates the anterior border of the sigmoid sinus. Additionally, the temporal line may not accurately identify the tegmen near the sinodural angle. This study examines the reliability of the parietal notch as a surface landmark of the sigmoid sinus at the sinodural angle. Methods: Forty-seven cadaveric temporal bones were used to identify the parietal notch by two observers. The parietal notch and sinodural angle were labeled with radiopaque markers, mounted on foam, and CT imaged in the axial plane. The horizontal and vertical distances between the labeled landmarks were measured using PACS software. Results: The parietal notch location was identified in 43/47 specimens. The notch was posterior to the sinodural angle in 90.6% and superior in 65% of the specimens. The average horizontal and vertical distance between the two landmarks was 6.1 mm (SD = 5.4) and 0.8 mm (SD = 8.7), respectively. In 60% of the specimens the parietal notch was within 6 mm of the sinodural angle in the horizontal dimension. Conclusions: The parietal notch is identified in most temporal bones. It also approximates the anterior boarder of the sigmoid sinus and level of the tegmen due to its proximity to the sinodural angle. The parietal notch helps to define the posterosuperior margins of a mastoid dissection and may assist surgeons during mastoid surgery.

Teaching Effective Informed Consent Communication Skills in the Virtual Surgical Clerkship.

BACKGROUND: The disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate medical education allowed for assessment of virtual curricular innovations. One of the difficulties encountered in the virtual curriculum is the teaching of clinical competencies that would traditionally require students to undergo in-person simulations and patient encounters. We implemented a novel informed consent activity module, with standardized patients, to improve self-efficacy in communication within our core surgery clerkship. STUDY DESIGN: All medical students who participated in the virtual surgery clerkship were recruited to participate in a retrospective survey study regarding the novel informed consent module. These questions evaluated their perceived competence in 4 domains relating to informed consent: identifying the key elements, describing common challenges, applying the New Mexico Clinical Communication Scale (NMCCS), and documenting. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 90 students participated in the study (38% of the cohort). Respondents to the survey reported that their self-efficacy in communication skills related to informed consent improved as a result of their participation in the activity in each of the 4 domains surveyed (p < 0.01), with the majority of students identifying as satisfactory or above in each domain post-module. Students generally viewed the virtual informed consent activity positively, but noted that it was not the same as an in-person clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: A virtual module of communication skills training, using standardized patients and faculty, improved students' belief in their self-efficacy in obtaining informed consent. This communication module can be useful in a virtual or mixed curricular structure for both current and future medical students.