Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 47(11): 101346, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35932849

ABSTRACT

Patients with cancer are at higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently there are no definitive data on clinical outcomes for nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs) and warfarin in cancer patients with AF. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin. A search through Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library was done from the databases inception to March 2022. Studies that compared NOACs to warfarin in the setting of AF and cancer were included. The primary outcomes were the incidence of major bleeding and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), intracranial bleeding, and Major gastrointestinal bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to report the outcomes. A total of 11 studies were included. We found that NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding and combined ischemic stroke/SE in patients with AF and cancer compared with warfarin (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.75, P < 0.0001 and RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.47-0.75, P < 0.0001, respectively). Also, there was lower incidence of Intracranial and major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who received NOACs compared with warfarin (P < 0.0001). Network analyses revealed that apixaban and dabigatran were associated with reduction of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Among patients who diagnosed with AF and cancer, NOACs were associated with lower incidence of major bleeding ischemic stroke/SE compared with warfarin. Furthermore, NOACs were associated with lower gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Ischemic Stroke , Neoplasms , Stroke , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Network Meta-Analysis , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Warfarin/adverse effects
3.
Int J Cardiol ; 236: 164-167, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Device interrogation has become a standard part of the syncope evaluation for patients admitted with permanent pacemakers (PPM) or implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), although few studies have shown interrogation yields clinically useful data. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of device interrogation as well as other commonly performed tests in the workup of unexplained syncope in patients with previously implanted PPMs or ICDs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 88 patients admitted to our medical center for syncope with previously implanted pacemakers between January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2015 using ICD-9 billing data. RESULTS: Pacemaker interrogation demonstrated an arrhythmia as the cause for syncope in 4 patients (4%) and evidence of device failure secondary to perforation in 1 patient (1%). The cause of syncope was unknown in 34 patients (39%). Orthostatic hypotension was the most commonly identified cause of syncope (26%), followed by vasovagal syncope (13%), autonomic dysfunction (5%), ventricular arrhythmia (3%), atrial arrhythmia (2%), congestive heart failure (2%), stroke (2%), and other less common causes (8%). History was the most important determinant of syncope (36%), followed by orthostatic vital signs (14%), device interrogations (4%), head CT (2%), and transthoracic echocardiogram (1%). CONCLUSIONS: Device interrogation is rarely useful for elucidating a cause of syncope without concerning physical exam, telemetry, or EKG findings. Interrogation may occasionally yield paroxysmal arrhythmias responsible for syncopal episode, but these rarely alter clinical outcomes. Interrogation appears to be more useful in patients with syncope after recent device placement.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable/standards , Pacemaker, Artificial/standards , Population Surveillance , Syncope/diagnostic imaging , Syncope/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/complications , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnostic imaging , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Syncope/etiology
4.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 7(5): 362-7, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16105492

ABSTRACT

Palpitations are a common complaint seen in the outpatient setting and the vast majority are benign, although they are occasionally a manifestation of potentially life-threatening conditions. We offer a step-wise guide to the evaluation and management of these patients with the primary goal to identify patients at highest risk for serious arrhythmias. We offer a brief overview of effective management of the varied causes of palpitations.


Subject(s)
Tachycardia , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Humans , Tachycardia/diagnosis , Tachycardia/physiopathology , Tachycardia/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...