ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The best regional anesthesia plan with the best clinical results for Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has not been defined yet. METHODS: Prospective multicentric observational study of two non-randomized matched cohorts including patients undergoing elective unilateral CEA (N.=100) between January-October 2021. Main outcomes were cerebral oximetry measurements, verbal numeric pain score assessment, peripheral nerve blockades and in-hospital stay. The main objective is to compare results achieved after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under loco-regional blockade (LRB) versus general anesthesia (GA), in terms of intraoperative hemodynamic and neurologic variability. Patients undergoing LRB were performed under ultrasound (US) guidance and mild sedation. RESULTS: The LRB and GA groups showed no differences in comorbidities and risk factors. However, there was a significant difference in the intraoperative hemodynamic behavior due to the amount of vasoactive drugs used (0% vs. 16% for phenylephrine, P=0.006). The results showed neurological stability through the cerebral oximetry measurements during the procedure except for the left hemisphere de-clamp values, which were higher in the GA group (68.7±9.9 vs. 72.7±8.8; P=0.035). There were also significant differences in the verbal pain scale scores assessed 6 hours and 12 hours after the procedure; better pain control was evidenced in the LRB group (0[0-1] vs. 1[0-3], P=0.01; 1[0.5-2] vs. 0[0-2], P=0.01). An increased transient hypoglossal and laryngeal nerves blockade was observed in the LRB group (30% vs. 4%; P<0.001). The in-hospital length of stay was longer in the GA group (77.2±36.3 hours vs. 129.1±41.1 hours; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of intermediate-deep cervical plexus blockade for CEA confers similar neurologic stability as GA does, there is a difference on the hemodynamic behaviour due to the differences in vasoactive drug consumption. Loco-regional techniques provide a better postoperative pain control and shorten in-hospital length of stay.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Humans , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Endarterectomy, Carotid/methods , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Treatment Outcome , Oximetry , Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Pain/etiologyABSTRACT
(1) Introduction: The aim was to describe the anesthetic and surgical technique of eversion carotid endarterectomy performed under intermediate-deep cervical block with sedation, and to analyze the intraoperative and postoperative results. (2) Material and Methods: Thirty cases of unilateral eversion carotid endarterectomy (n = 30), performed between 2019-2020 in a tertiary center under intermediate-deep ultrasound-guided cervical plexus block and sedation, were prospectively observed and analyzed. Hemodynamic (blood pressure, heart rate) and neurological (cerebral oximetry) variables were measured in four intraoperative phases: at the beginning of the operation, prior to carotid clamping, after unclamping and at the end of the operation. We assessed acute postoperative pain in a numerical rating scale at 6, 12 and 24 h, early and 30-day complications, and length of stay. (3) Results: Baseline mean arterial pressure values were 100.4 ± 18 mmHg, pre-clamping 95.8 ± 14 mmHg, post-clamping 94.9 ± 11 mmHg, and at the end of the operation 102.4 ± 16 mmHg. Cerebral oximetry values were 61.7 ± 7/62.7 ± 8, 68.5 ± 9.6/69.1 ± 11.7 and 68.1 ± 10/68.1 ± 10 for the left and right hemispheres at baseline, pre- and post-clamping, respectively. The pain assessment showed a score less than or equal to 3. The incidence of residual nerve block, early complications, and major complications in the first 30 days was 40%, 16.7% and 3.3%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The combination of intermediate-deep cervical plexus block and low-dose sedation is an effective and safe alternative in awake eversion carotid endarterectomy.
ABSTRACT
No disponible
