Diabetes treatment deintensification in Australians with dementia compared to the general population: A national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of dementia may change peoples' goals of care. In people with diabetes, this may lead to relaxing treatment targets and reducing the use of diabetes medications. The aim of this study was to examine changes in diabetes medication use before and after initiating medication for dementia. METHODS: A national cohort of people aged 65-97 years, living with dementia and diabetes, and a general population cohort with diabetes matched for age, sex, and index date were extracted from the Australian national medication claims database. Trajectories of diabetes medication use, expressed as mean defined daily dose (DDD) each month for each individual from 24 months before to 24 months after the index date, were estimated using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM). Cohorts were analyzed separately. RESULTS: People with dementia (N = 1884) and the matched general population (N = 7067) had a median age of 80 years (interquartile range 76-84) and 55% were female. In both models, people exhibited one of five diabetes medication trajectories, with 16.5% of people with dementia and 24.0% of the general population assigned to trajectories that represented deintensification. In the general population model, those on deintensifying trajectories were older than those on stable trajectories (median 83 vs. 79 years). In the dementia cohort model, those on high or low deintensifying trajectories were slightly older (median age 81 or 82, respectively, vs. 80 years) and had at least 1 more comorbidity (median 8 or 7, respectively, vs. 6) than those on stable trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating medication for dementia does not appear to be a trigger for deintensification of diabetes treatment regimens. Deintensification was more common in the general population; people living with dementia are potentially overtreated for diabetes.

The changing pattern of statin use in people with dementia: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: After a dementia diagnosis, goals of care are often reassessed, including the use of preventive medications like statins. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in statin use after initiating medication for managing dementia. METHODS: A case-crossover study utilizing medication dispensing data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% random sample was conducted. Use of statins was compared in the 12 months pre- and post-initiation (pre-period and post-period) of anti-dementia medications or risperidone for behavioural symptoms of dementia. Individuals aged ≥65 years who had their first dispensing of anti-dementia medication or risperidone between July 2006 and June 2017 and survived ≥12 months after their first supply were included. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for change in statin use in the discordant pairs. RESULTS: The cohort (n = 19,809) had a median age of 81 years and 61% were female. Statins were less likely to be used after initiating anti-dementia medication or risperidone (OR 0.50; 95%CI 0.45-0.55). The OR for statin use in the post-period versus the pre-period decreased annually over the 11 years from 1.21; 95%CI 0.84-1.75 in 2006-7 to 0.31; 95%CI 0.24-0.41 in 2016-17 (p for interaction <0.05). CONCLUSION: Statins are more likely to be ceased than started after initiating medication for dementia. This may reflect changes in goals of care, or changes in the interpretation of the available evidence for the safety and efficacy of statins in older people living with dementia.

Rates of PRN Medication Administration in Australian Residential Aged Care.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate administration of pro re nata (PRN) medications and nurse-initiated medications (NIMs) in Australian aged care services over a 12-month period. DESIGN: Twelve-month longitudinal audit of medication administrations. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred ninety-two residents of 10 aged care services in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS: Records of PRN and NIM administration were extracted from electronic and hard copy medication charts. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate medication administration per person-month. Poisson regression was used to estimate predictors of PRN administration. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range 10-12 months), 93% of residents were administered a PRN medication and 41% of residents an NIM on 21,147 and 552 occasions, respectively. The mean number of any PRN administration was 5.85 per person-month. The most frequently administered PRN medications per person-month were opioids 1.54, laxatives 0.96, benzodiazepines 0.72, antipsychotics 0.48, paracetamol 0.46, and topical preparations 0.42. Three-quarters of residents prescribed a PRN opioid or PRN benzodiazepine and two-thirds of residents prescribed a PRN antipsychotic had the medication administered on 1 or more occasions over the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Most residents were administered PRN medications. Administration was in line with Australian regulations and institutional protocols. However, the high frequency of PRN analgesic, laxative, and psychotropic medication administration highlights the need for regular clinical review to ensure ongoing safe and appropriate use.

The role of medication advisory committees in residential aged care services.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing international interest in initiatives to reduce medication-related harm and preventable hospitalizations in residential aged care services (RACS). The Australian Government recommends that RACS establish multidisciplinary Medication Advisory Committees (MACs). No previous research has specifically investigated the structures and functioning of MACs. OBJECTIVES: To explore the current structures and functioning of MACs, and identify opportunities for MACs to better promote safe and effective medication use. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with a maximum variation sample of health professionals (n = 44) across four health services operating across 27 RACS in rural and regional Victoria, Australia. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive and inductive content analyses. Results were presented to a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 13) to identify opportunities for improvement. RESULTS: Deductively coded themes included composition and functioning of the MAC, education and information needs and support to better manage polypharmacy. Emergent inductively coded themes included general medical practitioner (GP) and pharmacist engagement, collaboration and effectiveness. Participation by GPs and pharmacists was variable, while no MACs involved residents or family carers. Aged care specific and multidisciplinary MACs were generally more proactive in addressing potential medication-related harm. Education to identify and report adverse drug events with high risk medications was identified as a priority. The multidisciplinary panel made 12 recommendations to promote safe and effective medication use. CONCLUSION: Despite all MACs having a strong commitment to medication safety, opportunities exist to improve the composition and structure, proactive identification and response to emerging issues, and systems for staff, resident and family carer training.

Development and validation of the Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE).

BACKGROUND: Residents of aged care facilities use increasingly complex medication regimens. Reducing unnecessary medication regimen complexity (eg, by consolidating the number of administration times or using alternative formulations) may benefit residents and staff. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an implicit tool to facilitate medication regimen simplification in aged care facilities. METHOD: A purposively selected multidisciplinary expert panel used modified nominal group technique to identify and prioritize factors important in determining whether a medication regimen can be simplified. The five prioritized factors were formulated as questions, pilot-tested using non-identifiable medication charts and refined by panel members. The final tool was validated by two clinical pharmacists who independently applied the tool to a random sample of 50 residents of aged care facilities to identify opportunities for medication regimen simplification. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) was developed as an implicit tool comprising of five questions about 1) the resident; 2) regulatory and safety requirements; 3) drug interactions; 4) formulation; and 5) facility and follow-up considerations. Using MRS GRACE, two pharmacists independently simplified medication regimens for 29/50 and 30/50 residents (Cohen's kappa=0.38, 95% CI 0.12-0.64), respectively. Simplification was possible for all residents with five or more administration times. Changing an administration time comprised 75% of the two pharmacists' recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Using MRS GRACE, two clinical pharmacists independently simplified over half of residents' medication regimens with fair agreement. MRS GRACE is a promising new tool to guide medication regimen simplification in aged care.