Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 357, 2019 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31387574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures. They often need to be treated by surgery, where the use of a compression screw is the globally accepted gold standard. Surgeons may choose between different implant materials including titanium alloys, which remain in the body or are removed after healing. An alternative are biodegradable magnesium-based implants. Properties of magnesium alloys include high stability, osteoconductivity, potential reduction of infections and few artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of magnesium-based compression screws compared with titanium Herbert screws for scaphoid fractures. METHODS: The trial is designed as a multicenter, blinded observer, randomized controlled parallel two-group post market trial. Approximately 190 patients will be randomized (1:1) with stratification by center either to titanium or magnesium-based compression screws. Follow-up is 1 year per patient. Surgical procedures and aftercare will be performed according to the German treatment guideline for scaphoid fractures. The first primary endpoint is the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score after 6 months. The second primary endpoint is a composite safety endpoint including bone union until 6 months, no adverse device effect (ADE) during surgery or wound healing and no serious ADE or reoperation within 1 year. The third primary endpoint is the difference in change MRI artifacts over time. Non-inferiority will be investigated for primary endpoints 1 (t-test confidence interval) and 2 (Wilson's score interval) using both the full analysis set (FAS) and the per protocol population at the one-sided 2.5% test-level. Superiority of magnesium over titanium screws will be established using the FAS at the two-sided 5% test-level (Welch test) only if non-inferiority has been established for both primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints include quality of life. DISCUSSION: This study will inform care providers whether biodegradable magnesium-based implants are non-inferior to standard titanium Herbert screws for the treatment of scaphoid fractures in terms of wrist function and safety. Furthermore, superiority of magnesium-based implants may be demonstrated using MRI, which is used as surrogate endpoint for screw degradation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS, DRKS00013368 . Registered Dec 04, 2017.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants/adverse effects , Bone Screws/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Scaphoid Bone/injuries , Wrist Injuries/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Magnesium/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Scaphoid Bone/diagnostic imaging , Scaphoid Bone/surgery , Titanium/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Wrist Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Injuries/physiopathology , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Joint/physiopathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...