Endoscopic carpal tunnel release with or without suture: Does it make a difference? A case-control study.

A case-control study was conducted to compare wound healing with or without skin suture after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The primary endpoint was esthetics on the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). Patients were recruited between April 2016 and April 2017. Inclusion criteria comprised carpal tunnel syndrome with clinical and electromyographic confirmation on the Canterbury NCS (nerve conduction studies) Severity Scale. Age, gender, occupation, handedness, smoking status, and operated side were noted. In the first group (64 patients) the skin was not sutured. In the second group (44 patients) the skin was closed Ethilon™ 5-0 intradermal running suture. All 108 patients had 3 months' follow-up. Since data were not normally distributed, analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test (MWU) for independent samples. There were no significant differences in age (p = 0,416), gender (p = 0.670) or occupation (p = 0.725) between groups. MSS score did not significantly differ between groups (MWU test; p = 0.529): sutureless, 6.64 ± 1.21; sutured, 6.45 + 1.09. Thus, sutureless wound closure can be a useful option in treating carpal tunnel syndrome by a single-portal endoscopic technique. That the wound remains open enables easy evacuation of any hematoma, avoiding pain due increased intra-tissular pressure.

The significance of the clavicle on shoulder girdle function.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) can have a congenital partial or total absence of the clavicle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional shoulder score in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with CCD who were members of a social media group were invited to take part in an Internet-based survey. The questionnaire was composed of 3 general questions, a question concerning partial or total absence of the clavicle, and 3 patient-based shoulder scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and patient-based Constant-Murley score). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (27 women, 9 men) with a mean age of 40 years participated in the survey; 17 patients had a bilateral absence, 16 patients had a bilateral partial absence, and 3 patients had a total absence on one side and a partial absence of the clavicle on the other side. The average patient-based Constant-Murley score was 79; shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, 11; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 93. There was no significant difference in the scores between left and right. There was no correlation between partial and total absences and the shoulder scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with self-reported CCD are subjectively normal to their peers when they are evaluated with 3 common shoulder scores. There was no correlation between partial and total absences and the shoulder scores.

Relationship of the Medial Clavicular Head to the Manubrium in Normal and Symptomatic Degenerated Sternoclavicular Joints.

BACKGROUND: Clavicular prominence is common in patients with symptomatic degenerative sternoclavicular arthritis. It is unclear if this is caused by enlargement or subluxation of the clavicle. The aim of this report is to describe a reproducible measurement technique to evaluate the relationship of the medial clavicular head to the manubrium. METHODS: One hundred normal sternoclavicular joints, twenty-five sternoclavicular joints with symptomatic degenerative arthritis, and twenty-five non-symptomatic sternoclavicular joints on the contralateral side were studied with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction with use of computer modeling. The greatest width (anterior-posterior distance) and height (superior-inferior distance) of the clavicle in the sagittal plane were measured, and the positions of the anterior and superior borders of the medial clavicle and their distances to the frontal and axial planes, respectively, were evaluated. The ratio of the anterior-posterior distance to the anterior-frontal plane distance was measured to evaluate the anterior-posterior position of the clavicle and the ratio of the superior-inferior distance to the superior-axial plane distance was measured to evaluate its superoinferior position. If the ratio was not in the 95% normal range, the clavicle was defined as subluxated. The reproducibility of this technique was evaluated on the basis of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: This technique showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The mean anterior-posterior and superior-inferior distances were significantly larger in association with symptomatic sternoclavicular arthritis than in the normal sternoclavicular joints (p < 0001). The clavicle was subluxated anteriorly in twenty-two of the twenty-five cases of symptomatic sternoclavicular arthritis, but it was not subluxated superiorly. CONCLUSIONS: The medial clavicular head in patients with degenerative sternoclavicular arthritis is significantly larger than it is in the normal population, and it is usually subluxated anteriorly.

A glenoid reaming study: how accurate are current reaming techniques?

BACKGROUND: Correct reaming of a degenerative glenoid can be a difficult procedure. We investigated how the quality of the reamed surface is influenced by different reamers, by the surgeon's experience, and by glenoid erosion patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three shoulder surgeons performed reaming procedures with different types of reamers (flat, convex, K-wire guided, and nipple guided) on a series of similarly sized uniconcave and biconcave glenoids. The reproducibility of reaming and the effect of different reamers on different-shaped glenoids were measured and evaluated. RESULTS: The center and direction of reaming were constant for all surgeons in the case of type A glenoids. For type B2 glenoids, the center and direction of reaming differed significantly between surgeons. The congruity of the reamed surface was better after flat reaming than after convex reaming. Whether the reamers were guided by a central K-wire or by a nipple had no significant effect on the reamed surface. The experience of the surgeon had no effect on the congruity of reaming. CONCLUSIONS: Reaming of a uniconcave glenoid is reproducible, but reaming of a biconcave glenoid seems much more difficult. Erosion and deformity of the glenoid influence the accuracy of reaming the most. Surgical experience plays a less important role. We conclude that there is a need for guidance in reaming of biconcave glenoids.

Evaluation of the muscle volumes of the transverse rotator cuff force couple in nonpathologic shoulders.

BACKGROUND: The balance between the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor muscles, often referred to as the rotator cuff transverse force couple (TFC), has been proposed to be a critical component for normal shoulder function. The relationship between the muscle volume and the power means that TFC can be evaluated with the measurement of the muscle volume of the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor. The aim of this study is to evaluate an innovative computed tomography (CT)-based technique to measure the muscle volume and to evaluate if there is a significant difference between muscle volumes of both the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor in nonpathologic shoulders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 27 shoulders (21 patients) with a full scapula and a proximal humeral head were evaluated. Two volume masks (subscapularis and infraspinatus/teres minor) were calculated on the basis of the assigned muscle contours on the transverse slices. The intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: The intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficient was excellent. The correlation between the anterior and posterior part of the TFC was strong. There was no significant difference between the volume masks. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle volume of the TCF can be quantified using CT images. In nonpathologic shoulders, there is no significant difference between the muscle volume of the anterior (subscapularis) and posterior part (teres minor/infraspinatus) of the TFC.