[Assessment of professional practices on the use of computerized medicine cabinets by registered nurses]. / Évaluation des pratiques professionnelles sur l'utilisation des armoires informatisées de stockage des médicaments par les infirmiers diplômés d'état.

Ensuring the safety of patient medication management is a public health priority. In hospitals, the medication circuit involves risks, especially in terms of storage. As part of an institutional project, the deployment of computerized medicine cabinets in our hospital's care units was initiated in 2015. By 2022, almost all care departments were equipped. Each drug picking is carried out by the registered nurse according to the patient's name, in accordance with the administration plan. In addition, local recommendations are to collect medication for a maximum of 24hours. In this context, our objective was to assess nursing professional practices in order to identify the steps requiring action plans. To meet this objective, we i) studied the compliance of computerized drug samplings with prescriptions on a given day throughout the establishment, ii) assessed picking practices with an observational audit, and iii) proposed questionnaires, including practical cases and satisfaction questions. Over 300 prescriptions were analyzed, including 2,511 drugs requiring at least one collect on the day of the assessment. The compliance rate for picking in relation to the drugs prescribed was 44.7%. According to the audit observation, the picking compliance rate was 74.5%. Non-compliances were mainly linked to the selection of the wrong patient at the computerized medicine cabinet and/or to a picking for longer than the recommended duration. Finally, the rate of correct answers to the proposed cases was 61.9%, and nurses were generally satisfied or very satisfied with the equipment.

Context of instauration and evolution under isavuconazole, a 2-year prospective real-life study.

To describe reasons for initiation and evolution under isavuconazole (ISZ), a 2-year prospective and observational study was performed. Anonymized data collected during the first 3 months of treatment were indications of treatment, efficacy, overall survival (OS), evolution of toxicity markers, and ISZ trough levels. Fifty-one (26 invasive aspergillosis, 16 prophylaxis, and 9 mucormycosis) patients started on isavuconazole. Isavuconazole was initiated upfront in 12/51 cases, especially to avoid toxicities from other antifungals. As second-line therapy (39/51 patients), isavuconazole was mostly initiated after toxicities of the previous treatments (66.7%; 26/39 cases). An improvement in toxicity markers was reported in most patients. However, five patients experienced adverse events. The mean ISZ trough levels measured from 179 samples collected in 37 patients was 3.33 ± 1.64 mg/l. The mean ISZ through levels was significantly lower (P = .003) in alloHSCT recipients (3.10 ± 1.45 mg/l) than in other patients (3.76 ± 1.88 mg/l) but still within the expected range of efficacy. After 12 weeks, the OS was 69.2% (n = 18/26) in the invasive aspergillosis intention-to-treat (ITT) group and 44.4% (n = 4/9) in the mucormycosis ITT group. After 2 years, the OS was respectively 46.2% (n = 12/26) and 33.3% (n = 3/9) in these two groups.

Isavuconazole is commonly prescribed as second-line therapy after the toxicity of a previous treatment. In most cases, an improvement is reported. The well tolerability of isavuconazole was associated with correct blood levels, even in alloHSCT recipients.

Assessment of the clinical perception, quality of life and satisfaction of patients with severe congenital haemophilia A without inhibitor after 1 year of emicizumab therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Since the approval by the EMA of emicizumab for the care of severe haemophilia A without inhibitor, most of the patients of our haemophilia treatment centre started this new treatment. Thanks to the setting of a therapeutic patient education program including three pharmaceutical consultations (PC), we could follow patients' lifestyle evolution. AIM: The study aimed to assess the perceived clinical evolution, quality of life and treatment satisfaction of patients after 1 year of emicizumab therapy in real-life settings. METHODS: The study was observational, retrospective and monocentric. Every patient over 18 years old receiving emicizumab from June 2020 and who underwent the 3 PC until March 2022 were included. The clinical evolution was self-estimated by patients with zero-to-six scales before versus 1 year after emicizumab, according to the following parameters: general health state, pain and bleedings (spontaneous or post-traumatic, and patients' identification ability). Patients' quality of life was also estimated with the EQ-5D-3L survey. Their satisfaction, graduated with a zero-to-ten scale, and treatment management were reported during the third PC. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. Their general health state improved significantly (p = .0023) with an EQ-5D-3L score at 69.6 (±19.4) out of 100. Although chronic pains remained a persistent issue for 33 (86.8%) patients, their intensity was significantly decreasing after 1 year. Perceived frequency of bleedings was significantly reduced too. On average, the satisfaction of emicizumab therapy was 9.1 (± 1.02) out of 10. CONCLUSION: After 1 year of emicizumab therapy, the general health state estimated by patients improved, the pain and the perceived frequency of bleedings diminished. Overall, this treatment received a high patients' satisfaction rate.

Conditional prescriptions of oral antihypertensive drugs for the management of hypertension urgencies in the inpatient setting: An observational study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: The management of hypertension urgencies during hospitalization may generally not necessitate urgent care. However, physicians frequently prescribe 'as needed' antihypertensive drugs for which administration is triggered by blood pressure thresholds. The lack of rationale for this hospital practice led us to study oral conditional antihypertensive (OCA) prescriptions. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of OCA prescriptions and to establish their characteristics. METHODS: In our institution, prescriptions are computerized. The study was retrospectively performed using a hospital clinical data warehouse over a 5-year period. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The prevalence of OCA prescriptions was 6.9% among subjects treated with an antihypertensive drug. The median duration of these prescriptions was 4 days, until the day of the patient discharge in 78.8% stays. The calcium channel inhibitors were the main (79.9%) pharmacological class prescribed, with mostly prescriptions of nicardipine. OCA prescriptions were associated with another antihypertensive medication in 58.8% of the prescriptions; for 19.3%, it was a medication belonging to the same pharmacological class than the OCA drug prescribed. Regarding the computerized drafting, 39.6% of the conditional prescriptions were considered uninterpretable. At least one administration by nurses concerned 65.1% of the OCA prescriptions. The mean SBP and DBP before the initiation of an OCA drug was 142.9 ± 28.2 and 75.8 ± 24.5 mm Hg, respectively, relative to 143.0 ± 24.9 and 77.6 ± 19.9 mm Hg after the initiation (P = .8 for SBP and P = .06 for DBP). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The originality of this study lies in the use of a clinical data warehouse to evaluate OCA prescriptions in hospital. These prescriptions are current, often uninterpretable and mostly ordered until patient discharge. Such drug orders could be associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic events and/or administration errors. This underlies the need for developing decision support tools and computerized protocols to manage hypertension urgencies.