Consequences of Discontinuing a 4/6 Cyclin D-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor During Endocrine Treatment in Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in the Context of the COVID-19 Outbreak.

BACKGROUND: The impact of some hasty medical decision made during the first wave of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. We have evaluated the consequences of one of these precautionary measures: the withdrawal of the cyclin D-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in patients whose metastatic disease was controlled by a combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. METHOD: This study was noninterventional, retrospective, multicentric, and included 60 patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic disease. Their disease was controlled with the combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. The CDK 4/6i was stopped for two months during the first COVID-19 outbreak. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the risk factors associated with disease progression. RESULTS: During this therapeutic break, 22 (37 %) patients had a radiological and/or clinical disease progression. Among them, the CDK 4/6i was re-introduced to 16 patients (n = 16/22; 73 %). A new line of treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was initiated due to the rapid symptomatic tumor progression in four patients (n = 4/22; 18 %). Two patients (n = 2/22) died in visceral crisis before another anti-tumoral treatment was introduced. In univariate analysis, the presence of liver metastases increased the risk of metastatic disease progression during the withdrawal of the CDK 4/6 (OR = 6.6; 95 % CI 1.87-23.22; P= .0033). CONCLUSION: Progression was observed in 37% of patients during the two-month treatment interruption of the CDK 4/6i. A prolonged CDK 4/6i treatment interruption in patients with clinical benefit on endocrine treatment does not seem to be a reasonable option in light of these results.

Impact of the app-based and nurse-led supportive care program AKO@dom on dose intensity of oral-targeted therapies in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: a multicentric observational retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain a cornerstone of metastatic kidney cancer (mRCC). Adverse events (AEs) may lead to dose downregulation, and optimal management of AEs is needed to maintain an efficient dose intensity (DI). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of an app-based and nurse-led supportive-care program on DI in mRCC patients. METHOD: This multicenter (n = 3), retrospective study evaluated all consecutive mRCC patients who participated in the AKO@dom program, which consisted of an app-based and nurse-led weekly patient evaluation at home during the first 3 months of TKI intake. Treatment patterns and modifications were described, and the mean DI (mDI) was calculated at the end of AKO@dom. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included: 12 had sunitinib, 18 pazopanib, 12 axitinib, and 47 cabozantinib. Median age was 69 years (60-76). TKIs were mainly initiated at standard doses except for cabozantinib (53% started at 40 mg/day); 71% had prior systemic treatment. Nine patients discontinued permanent treatment during the program. Thirty-two patients required ≥ 1 dose interruption, and 29% experienced ≥ 1 grade 3 AE of any type. The mDI (in mg/day) at 3 months was 34.4 ± 17.7 for sunitinib, 672.8 ± 144 for pazopanib, 8.6 ± 2.6 for axitinib, and 40 (36-48) for cabozantinib. Fifty-five patients [68.75% (95% CI: 57-78%)] had a mDI ≥ than reported in the literature. Overall survival at 12 months was 64.2% (CI 95%: 55-75%). CONCLUSION: The AKO@dom program allowed 68.75% of patients to maintain a high dose intensity after 3 months of TKI treatment. The impact on survival outcomes needs to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.

[MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas: Natural history, molecular features and multidisciplinary management]. / Les carcinomes du rein à translocation de la famille MiT : histoire naturelle, caractéristiques moléculaire et prise en charge multidisciplinaire.

MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas (tRCC) represent a rare subtype of renal cell carcinomas. These tumors have been introduced for the first time in the World Health Classification (WHO) classification of kidney cancers in 2004. tRCC are characterized by reccurent translocations involving members of the MiT family transcription factors, mainly TFE3 and TFEB. The estimated incidence of these tumors is ∼1-5 % among all renal cell carcinomas, with female prodominance. tRCC were initially described in children, and the spectrum has been expanded over time to encompass adolescents and adults. TFE3- and TFEB-rearranged RCC harbor characteristic clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features and fluorescent hybridization in situ is considered the gold standard for their diagnosis, although it has some limitations especially when the partners are located in the vicinity of TFE3. Nephron-sparing surgery is an efficient treatment of localized cases when achievable. In metastatic setting, targeted agents and immunotherapy showed modest efficacy, with response rates and median overall survival inferior to those observed in clear-cell renal cell carcinomas. Management of tRCC necessite a multidisciplinary team and accrual in clinical trials have to be encouraged when possible. Novel biological insights are urgently awaited to better understand the mechanisms associated with kidney oncogenesis in this setting, and ultimately help to identify therapeutic targets.

Treatments, Outcomes, and Validity of Prognostic Scores in Patients With Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 20-Year Single-Institution Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a sarcomatoid component is a rare disease associated with a poor prognosis. We report the outcomes of 47 patients with metastatic sarcomatoid RCC (SRCC) treated with different modalities including chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immunotherapy over 2 decades in a French cancer center. Furthermore, we assessed the validity of prognostic scores in this subset of RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified from the database of the pathology department of the University Hospital of Strasbourg. We enrolled all patients with RCC with a sarcomatoid component diagnosed between 1995 and 2016. Patients with nonmetastatic RCC were excluded. Recorded variables included: clinical stage, metastatic sites, pathologic stage, type of treatments, prognostic group, and survival data. The primary end point was overall survival. The institutional ethical committee approved the study protocol. RESULTS: Of 104 patients with SRCC, 47 patients with metastatic SRCC were included. The median age was 60 years (range, 41-77 years). Median length of follow-up was 34 months (range, 1-180 months). Fifty-five percent of patients had known metastases at diagnosis. Lung represented the first metastatic site (70%) followed by glandular (28%), bone (23%), liver (21%), and brain (6%). Fifteen percent of patients received immunotherapy including cytokine-based therapy (n = 7), or checkpoint inhibitors (n = 2). Moreover, 7 patients received chemotherapy. Five patients received no systemic treatment because of their poor performance status. Of 42 treated patients, 2 patients achieved complete response and 9 partial response (24%). Median overall survival was 13.3 months. International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic groups were valid in this subset of SRCC patients. A sarcomatoid percentage cutoff of 30% had the strongest influence on overall survival. CONCLUSION: Despite the arrival of tyrosine kinase inhibitors 10 years ago, metastatic SRCC remains a disease of poor prognosis and difficult to treat. Chemotherapy regimen and targeted therapies showed little activity in SRCC. IMDC score is a relevant prognostic factor in SRCC patients. Additionally, the MSKCC score, the sarcomatoid percentage, the necrotic fraction, and the vascular invasion could prove useful in identifying patients with a more favorable prognosis. These findings could help toward better patient stratification in clinical trials. Prospective trials assessing new drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently ongoing to improve SRCC survival.

Correction to: Impact of new generation hormone-therapy on cognitive function in elderly patients treated for a metastatic prostate cancer: Cog-Pro trial protocol.

CORRECTION: After publication of the original article [1] the authors found that Table 2 had been formatted incorrectly, meaning that some rows in the Table did not display the correct information. An updated version of Table 2 is included with this Correction. The original article has also been updated.

Impact of new generation hormone-therapy on cognitive function in elderly patients treated for a metastatic prostate cancer: Cog-Pro trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: New generation hormone-therapies (NGHT) targeting the androgen signalling pathway are nowadays proposed to elderly patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa). The impact of these treatments on cognitive function has never been evaluated whereas cognitive impairment may have an impact on the autonomy and the treatment adherence. The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the incidence of cognitive impairment in elderly men after treatment by NGHT for a metastatic CRPCa. METHODS/DESIGN: The Cog-Pro study is a multicentre longitudinal study including CRPCa patients ≥70 years old treated with NGHT (n = 134), control metastatic prostate cancer patients without castration resistance treated with first generation androgen deprivation therapy (n = 55), and healthy participants (n = 33), matched on age and education. Cognitive, geriatric and quality of life assessment and biological tests will be performed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after start of the treatment (inclusion time). The primary endpoint is the proportion of elderly patients receiving a NGHT who will experience a decline in cognitive performances within 3 months after study enrollment. Secondary endpoints concern: autonomy, quality of life, anxiety, depression, cognitive reserve, adherence to hormone-therapy, comparison of the cognitive impact of 2 different NGHT (abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide), impact of co-morbidities and biological assessments. DISCUSSION: Evaluating, understanding and analyzing the incidence, severity of cognitive impairments and their impact on quality of life, autonomy and adherence in this group of patients with advanced disease is a challenge. This study should help to improve cancer care of elderly patients and secure the use of oral treatments as the risk of non-observance does exist. Our results will provide up-to date information for patients and caregivers on impact of these treatments on cognitive function in order to help the physicians in the choice of the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02907372 , registered: July 26, 2016.