Failure of transvenous ICD to terminate ventricular fibrillation in a patient with left ventricular noncompaction and polycystic kidneys.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) testing in patients with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) at the time of implantation and potential difficulties with ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction/termination in LVNC patients are often not stated in the literature. This report describes the failure of transvenous implantation of an ICD in a 40-year-old patient with LVNC and polycystic kidneys. A high defibrillation threshold (DFT) prevented termination of ICD-induced VF. This case suggests that DFT testing should be considered in any LVNC patient during ICD implantation. The association of LVNC and polycystic kidneys is also discussed.

Transcatheter intracardiac echocardiography-assisted closure of interatrial shunts: complications and midterm follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) improves the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter device-based closure of interatrial shunts, but the impact of this technique on midterm follow-up is unknown. We sought to prospectively evaluate midterm follow-up results of ICE-aided transcatheter closure of interatrial shunts in adults. METHODS: Over a 48-month period, we prospectively enrolled 140 consecutive patients (mean age 43 +/- 15. 5 years, 98 females) who had been referred to our center for catheter-based closure of interatrial shunts. All patients were screened with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before the operation. Patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent ICE study and attempted closure. Immediate success rates, predischarge occlusion rates, complication rates, as well as fluoroscopy and procedural times, patients' radiological exposure, midterm complication rates, and midterm occlusion rates were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred patients out of 140 (71.4%) underwent an attempt at transcatheter closure. After ICE study and measurements, the TEE-planned device type and size was changed in 31 patients with patent foramen ovale whereas the TEE-planned device size was changed in 41 patients with atrial septal defect (globally 72%). Procedural success rate, predischarge occlusion rate, and complication rate were 99, 90.7, and 12%, respectively. On mean follow-up of 36.6 +/- 14.8 months the follow-up occlusion rate was 96.5%. No aortic erosion or device thrombosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: ICE-guided interatrial shunt transcatheter closure is safe and effective and appears to have excellent midterm results thus avoiding the complications caused by device oversizing, such as aortic erosion and device thrombosis.

Ventricular-arterial coupling in patients with heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: may we predict the long-term clinical response?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) in patients with refractory congestive heart failure (HF), left bundle brunch block, and sinus rhythm. BACKGROUND: The ratio between arterial elastance (Ea) and left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), the so-called VAC, defines the efficiency of the myocardium in pumping blood. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were studied with echocardiography before CRT, and 1 year later. End-systolic elastance was calculated according to the method of Chen. Arterial elastance (ratio of the systolic pressure to the stroke volume), end-systolic volume (ESV), and quality of life (QoL) (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire) were assessed at the baseline and after 1 year. Patients with a reduction>15% of ESV or a decrease>33% in QoL score were considered responders to CRT. RESULTS: QRS duration and interventricular delay were significantly reduced with CRT compared with baseline (156+/-2 vs. 195+/-3 ms, P<0.001; and 25+/-2 vs. 55+/-3 ms, P<0.001, respectively). Arterial elastance/Ees decreased significantly on CRT (2.47+/-1.48 vs. 1.41+/-0.87, P<0.0001). The lowering of Ea/Ees was congruent to a decrease in intraventricular delay (83.1+/-55.7 vs. 28.4+/-49.5 ms, P<0.0001) and an increase in ejection fraction (26+/-6.3 vs. 36.9+/-8.0%, P<0.0001). Responders to CRT were 74 and 71% of the overall patient population, considering as endpoint QoL or ESV, respectively. The analysis of VAC showed a baseline cut-off value of 2, above which 88% and 69% of patients responded to CRT, considering as endpoint QoL or ESV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive assessment of VAC may be proposed as an immediate, easy, and optimal tool for quantifying the effect of CRT in patients with HF.