Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oncol Rep ; 14(5): 1209-14, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16211287

ABSTRACT

In patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) at the end of first line therapy an accurate imaging technique with high prognostic value is needed to assess response to treatment and predict those patients who will suffer disease relapse. This technique and its results permit the quick initiation of a second line therapy in patients suffering from a progressive disease or those unresponsive to treatment avoid over-treatment of patients in complete remission or those having a non-active residual disease. We included a (18)FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) scan to the diagnostic set-up to investigate 28 patients following the end of their treatment. Fifteen patients out of the 28 (54%) had positive CT scans while 13 (46%) had negative ones. Eleven patients out of the 15 CT positive (73%) had negative PET scans and no relapse. The remaining four patients (27%) had positive PET scans with only one relapse (25%). With respect to the 13 patients who had negative CT scans, 9 patients (69%) had negative PET scans and no relapse. The remaining 4 patients (31%) had positive PET scans with 3 relapse cases (75%). In our final assessment after a median follow-up period of 45 months, starting from PET execution to the last follow-up, overall sensitivity of the CT and the PET were 25 and 100% respectively, specificity 42 and 83% respectively, positive predictive value (PPV) 7 and 50% respectively, negative predictive value (NPV) 77 and 100% respectively, and accuracy 39 and 86% respectively. In our experience, FDG-PET performed in patients after induction therapy appears to offer important additional information: FDG-PET results are predictors of prognosis giving 100% DFS in PET negative patients and 54% DSF in PET positive patients.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Radiopharmaceuticals , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
FASEB J ; 19(11): 1525-7, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16009702

ABSTRACT

The hormone relaxin has been shown to cause coronary vasodilation and to prevent ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac injury in rodents. This study provides evidence that relaxin, used as an adjunctive drug to coronary reperfusion, reduces the functional, biochemical, and histopathological signs of myocardial injury in an in vivo swine model of heart ischemia/reperfusion, currently used to test cardiotropic drugs for myocardial infarction. Human recombinant relaxin, given at reperfusion at doses of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 microg/kg b.wt. after a 30-min ischemia, caused a dose-related reduction of key markers of myocardial damage (serum myoglobin, CK-MB, troponin T) and cardiomyocyte apoptosis (caspase 3, TUNEL assay), as well as of cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction (myofibril hypercontraction). Compared with the controls, relaxin also increased the uptake of the viability tracer 201Thallium and improved ventricular performance (cardiac index). Relaxin likely acts by reducing oxygen free radical-induced myocardial injury (malondialdehyde, tissue calcium overload) and inflammatory leukocyte recruitment (myeloperoxidase). The present findings show that human relaxin, given as a drug to counteract reperfusion-induced cardiac injury, affords a clear-cut protection to the heart of swine with induced myocardial infarction. The findings also provide background to future clinical trials with relaxin as adjunctive therapy to catheter-based coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Relaxin/therapeutic use , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Myocardial Contraction/drug effects , Myocardial Infarction/metabolism , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Peroxidase/analysis , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Swine , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
3.
Am Heart J ; 144(4): 630-5, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12360158

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients seen at the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP), noninvasive diagnostic strategies may differentiate patients at high or intermediate risk from those at low-risk for cardiovascular events and optimize the use of high-cost resources. However, in welfare healthcare systems, the feasibility, accuracy, and potential benefits of such management strategy need further investigation. METHODS: A total of 13,762 consecutive patients with CP were screened, and their conditions were defined as high, intermediate, and low risk for short-term cardiovascular events. Patients at high and intermediate risk were admitted. Patients at low risk were discharged from the ED if first line (<6 hours, including electrocardiogram, troponins, and serum cardiac markers) or second line short-term evaluation (<24 hours, including echocardiogram, rest or stress 99m-Tc myocardial scintigraphy, exercise tolerance test, or stress-echocardiography) had negative results. Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) were admitted. Patients without evidence of cardiovascular disease underwent screening for psychiatric and gastroesophageal disorders. Inhospital mortality rate was assessed in all patients. RESULTS: Among patients at high and intermediate risk (n = 9335), 2420 patients had acute myocardial infarction (26%, 10.6% mortality rate), 3764 had unstable angina (40%, 1.1% mortality rate), 129 had aortic dissection (1.4%, 23.3% mortality rate), and 408 had pulmonary embolism (4%, 27.6% mortality rate). The remaining 2614 had chronic coronary heart disease in the context of multiple pathology (n = 2256) or pleural or pericardial diseases (n = 358). Among patients at low risk (n = 4427), 2672 were discharged at <6 hours (60%, 0.2% incidence rate of nonfatal CAD at 6 months) and 870 patients were discharged at <24 hours (20%, no CAD at follow-up). The remaining 885 patients were recognized as having CAD (20%, 1.1% inhospital mortality rate). Finally, half of the patients without CAD had active gastroesophageal or anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: An effective screening program with an observation area inside the ED (1) could be implemented in a public healthcare environment and contribute significantly to the reduction of admissions, (2) could optimize the management of patients at high and intermediate risk and succeed in recognizing CAD in 20% of patients at low risk, and (3) could allow screening for alternative causes of CP in patients without evidence of CAD.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/etiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Pain Clinics/standards , Risk Assessment , Triage , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Angina, Unstable/diagnosis , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Pain Clinics/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , State Medicine/standards , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...