Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 22(7): 1920-5, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17395657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is caused by an X-linked deficiency in the activity of alpha-galactosidase A and the resultant accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) in multiple tissues. Nearly all classically affected males with FD experience kidney dysfunction, with progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the third decade of life or shortly thereafter. METHODS: Twenty-two FD patients (20 men and 2 women) receiving dialysis or who had a history of kidney transplantation were treated with agalsidase alfa in an open label setting using the same dosing regimen given to patients without ESRD (0.2 mg/kg every other week). Pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined during and following the initial dose, and safety was evaluated during therapy. Change in plasma Gb3 level was used as a surrogate marker of enzyme activity in vivo. RESULTS: A typical biphasic plasma elimination profile was seen in both dialysis and transplant patients, similar to that observed in 18 non-ESRD FD patients. Calculated PK parameters were similar to the three patient groups. In the male patients, plasma Gb3 level declined by 43% after 6 months (P<0.001). Infusion reactions were experienced by 8 of 21 (38%) patients, but did not result in any infusions being stopped prematurely. Anti-agalsidase alfa IgG antibodies were detected in 15.8% of males and 0% female patients. No anti-agalsidase alfa IgE antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The same dosing regimen of agalsidase alfa may be safely administered to FD patients with ESRD as given to those without ESRD.


Subject(s)
Fabry Disease/complications , Fabry Disease/drug therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology , alpha-Galactosidase/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Fabry Disease/blood , Fabry Disease/metabolism , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Isoenzymes/adverse effects , Isoenzymes/immunology , Isoenzymes/pharmacokinetics , Isoenzymes/therapeutic use , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins , Renal Dialysis , Time Factors , Trihexosylceramides/blood , alpha-Galactosidase/adverse effects , alpha-Galactosidase/immunology , alpha-Galactosidase/pharmacokinetics
2.
Ann Surg ; 239(5): 637-45; discussion 645-7, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15082967

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a comprehensive program for clinical genetic testing in a large group of extended families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1), with the ultimate aim of early tumor detection and surgical intervention. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Germline mutations in the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene are responsible for the MEN 1 syndrome. Direct genetic testing for a disease-associated MEN1 mutation is now possible in selected families. The neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas/duodenum and the intrathoracic neuroendocrine tumors that occur in MEN 1 carry a malignant potential. Importantly, these tumors arise in otherwise young healthy patients and are complicated by the potential for multifocality and involvement of multiple target tissues. The optimal screening methods and indications for early surgical intervention in genetically positive patients have yet to be defined. METHODS: Nine MEN 1 kindreds were included in the study. The mutations for each kindred were initially identified in the research laboratory. Subsequently, mutation detection was independently validated in the clinical Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory. Each patient in the study underwent formal genetic counseling before testing. RESULTS: Genetic testing was performed in 56 at-risk patients. Patients were stratified according to risk: Group I (n = 25), 50% risk, younger than 30 years old; Group II (n = 20), 50% risk, 30 years old or older; Group III (n = 11) 25% risk. Seven patients (age, 12 to 42 years; mean, 20.6 +/- 3.8 years) had a positive genetic test. Patients with a novel positive genetic test were in either Group I (n = 6) or Group II (n = 1) and have been followed for 35.8 +/- 2.0 months. Of the 7 genetically positive patients, hypercalcemia was either present at the time of diagnosis or developed during the period of follow-up in 6 patients. Four patients have undergone parathyroidectomy as early as age 16 years. One genetically positive patient has not yet developed hyperparathyroidism. Intensive biochemical screening in this select group of patients identified an elevated pancreatic polypeptide level and pancreatic tail mass lesion in a 15-year-old male who is asymptomatic and currently normocalcemic. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing identifies patients harboring an MEN1 mutation before the development of clinical signs or symptoms of endocrine disease. When genetically positive patients are carefully studied prospectively, biochemical evidence of neoplasia can be detected an average of 10 years before clinically evident disease, allowing for early surgical intervention. Genetically positive individuals should undergo focused cancer surveillance for early detection of the potentially malignant neuroendocrine tumors that account for most of the disease-related morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/genetics , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Calcium/blood , Child , Genes, Tumor Suppressor/physiology , Genetic Techniques/ethics , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/diagnosis , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/epidemiology , Parathyroidectomy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics
3.
Am J Med Genet A ; 122A(2): 95-9, 2003 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12955759

ABSTRACT

Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) may present with optic pathway gliomas (OPG) that can progress to visual loss or other neurologic symptoms. These tumors may become evident either as a result of patient signs or symptoms or as an incidental finding on "baseline" neuroimaging studies. In an attempt to determine if there were differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic children with OPG, a retrospective cohort study of ninety children with NF1 and OPG was performed using data from two large NF1 referral centers. Age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, tumor location, associated features, and clinical response were assessed for children who were initially symptomatic from their OPG (n = 51) and compared to similar data of asymptomatic children whose tumors were incidentally discovered by MRI (n = 39). There were no differences in age at presentation, tumor location, NF1-associated symptoms, or clinical response between the groups. Initially symptomatic children were much more likely to require treatment (OR: 14.8, 95% CI [1.9-116.7]) than those with incidentally discovered, asymptomatic OPG. Although 36% of OPG were diagnosed in children over the age of 6 years, none received prior neuroimaging and only two children had previously normal eye examinations, suggesting that the vast majority of OPG in this group were longstanding, undiagnosed tumors. Based on these findings, we do not advocate "baseline" MRI in children with NF1, but strongly recommend that all children of the age 10 years and younger with NF1 have complete annual ophthalmologic evaluations.


Subject(s)
Neurofibromatosis 1/complications , Optic Nerve Glioma/complications , Optic Nerve Neoplasms/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...