Serious Illness Communication Tool for Palliative Care Fellows: Development, Implementation, and Lessons Learned.

Introduction: Learning expert communication skills is a core educational goal within palliative care training, yet there are few communication-based educational tools specifically designed for specialty-trained palliative care providers. Objective: To develop and implement a tool to facilitate effective learning of serious illness communication for hospice and palliative medicine fellows. Methods: A novel formative assessment tool was developed within the UCLA Palliative Care Fellowship program, and utilized throughout the academic year on a weekly basis. Focus groups were held for fellows and faculty separately at the end of the academic year in order to gain insight into the experience and effectiveness of the tool. Focus group transcripts were analyzed through thematic analysis. Results: There was a 47% participation rate in the focus groups (n = 7). Qualitative analysis demonstrated positive impact of the tool in identifying learning goals, improving quality of feedback, and in standardizing language around advanced communication skills, with most value in the first half of the fellowship year. Some aspects of the tool were found to increase feedback anxiety, including the competency scoring component, frequency of use, and utilization with individual patient encounters. Conclusion: This novel communication tool provides an important addition to serious illness communication training of specialist palliative care providers, in creating a shared mental model for naming and organizing skills, as well as generating specific high quality learning goals and feedback. Preliminary feedback from our pilot implementation phase provided important information about how to refine the tool and remove components that unnecessarily added to feedback anxiety.

Needs assessment of current palliative care education in U.S. hematology/oncology fellowship programs.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care (PC) education for fellows in hematology/oncology (H/O) training programs is widely accepted, but no studies to date have assessed PC education practices and values among program leadership. METHODS: Program Directors and Associate Program Directors of active H/O fellowship programs in the U.S.A. were surveyed. RESULTS: Of 149 programs contacted, 84 completed the survey (56% response rate), of which 100% offered some form of PC education. The most frequently utilized methods of PC education were didactic lectures/conferences (93%), required PC rotations (68%), and simulation/role-playing (42%). Required PC rotations were ranked highest, and formal didactic seminars/conferences were ranked fifth in terms of perceived effectiveness. The majority felt either somewhat (60%) or extremely satisfied (30%) with the PC education at their program. Among specific PC domains, communication ranked highest, addressing spiritual distress ranked lowest, and care for the imminently dying ranked second lowest in importance and competency. Solid tumor oncologists reported more personal comfort with pain management (p = 0.042), non-pain symptom management (p = 0.014), ethical/legal issues (p = 0.029), reported their fellows were less competent in pain assessment/management (p = 0.006), and communication (p = 0.011), and were more satisfied with their program's PC education (p = 0.035) as compared with hematologists. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities exist between those modalities rated most effective for PC education and those currently in use. Clinical orientation of program leadership can affect both personal comfort with PC skills and estimations of PC curriculum effectiveness and fellows' competency. H/O fellowship programs would benefit from greater standardization and prioritization of active PC education modalities and content.

Lessons From the Development and Implementation of a Palliative Care Elective for Fourth-Year Medical Students: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Although palliative care is recognized as an important component of medical school curricula, the content and structure of education in the field is variable and often lacks outpatient exposure. We aimed to develop and implement a palliative care clinical elective for fourth-year medical students incorporating both inpatient and outpatient learning. METHODS: Fourteen medical students participated in a palliative care elective which included 2 weeks on an inpatient consult service and 1 week of outpatient clinic and home hospice visits. The elective was evaluated using a focus group and previously validated surveys assessing self-rated competency and attitudes toward caring for palliative care patients. Data were analyzed using paired t tests to compare survey response means before and after the elective. RESULTS: Of the 14 participating students, 7 completed both the pre- and postelective surveys. Significant improvements in self-rated competency were seen in pain and symptom management (P < .001), communication (P < .001), and advance care planning (P < .01). Survey results also showed improvement in attitudes toward caring for dying patients (P < .001), with lower scores at the end of the elective suggesting reduced emotional distress. Although the outpatient component was hypothesized to be a major benefit of the curriculum, qualitative data revealed the most highly valued component to be direct observation and feedback during inpatient time. CONCLUSION: Given the highlighted importance of direct observation and feedback as a unique and powerful learning experience, future work should be targeted toward enhancing the quality and timeliness of feedback delivered by the palliative care interdisciplinary team.

Cancer-related pain management in clinical oncology.

Uncontrolled pain is one of the most feared and debilitating symptoms among cancer patients, and many suffer unnecessarily from suboptimal pain control. Cancer-related pain is often multidimensional and can affect all aspects of a patient's life. Hence, achieving adequate pain relief among cancer patients involves a proper assessment of psychosocial, spiritual, and physical pain issues, matched with an individualized treatment plan involving pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, and procedural therapies when appropriate. Providing effective pain relief can help ease the overall burden of disease among oncology patients while helping them tolerate cancer-directed therapies and achieve the most optimal quality of life throughout all phases of the disease continuum. In this review, the authors will discuss the syndromes, assessment of, and treatment for cancer-related pain in the outpatient setting.