Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Med Dosw Mikrobiol ; 68(3-4): 175-181, 2016.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30376617

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTIONS: According to clinical observations primary neoplastic lesions in the head and neck are often complicated by infection. The incidence of postoperative complications of cancer lesions of the head and neck, oral cavity, upper airways or larynx is from 19% up to 47% cases but in extensive and long-term operations can reach 80%. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated results of microbiological investigations of 312 clinical specimens collected from patients from Clinical Head and Neck Cancers of On- cology Center in Warsaw in the years 2008 -2012. All samples of clinical materials were plated on the suitable culture media and incubated according to the recommendations. RESULTS: The study has shown that from all collected clinical specimens 491 strains have been isolated. Nearly half of the cultured bacteria were Gram-positive cocci (48.7%), mainly methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Most Gram-negative bacteria isolated from neoplastic lesions in the head and neck belong to Enterobacteriaceae (21%), 23,4% of cultured bacteria grown anaerobically and they were mainly Gram-negative rods. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of diverse bacterial flora colonizing the mucous membranes of the mouth and throat may be the reason of difficulties in interpretation of microbiological investigation. It must be remembered that knowledge of colonizing and pathogenic flora of the area of head and neck enables appropriate preoperative prevention and empiric therapy.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/microbiology , Humans , Microbiota , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcus aureus
2.
Head Neck ; 36(10): 1408-12, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24038658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the timing and type of surgical field contamination in 50 consecutive resections for advanced head and neck cancer with same-stage tissue reconstruction and to analyze the relationship between contamination and the surgical site infection. METHODS: Swabs from the surgical field and from surgical drapes close to the field were taken every 2 hours (at 0 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours) and sent for a standard microbiological diagnostic procedure. Results were recorded in Microsoft Excel and analyzed with SPSS. RESULTS: We collected 336 swabs of which 71% were contaminated. Polymicrobial contamination was observed in 153 samples (45%). Twenty-six species of pathogens were found, the most frequent was Streptococcus species. Surgical site infection with positive culture occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: In head and neck surgery for advanced cancer, standard aseptic procedures do not prevent contamination of the surgical field with physiological bacterial flora of the skin and oral cavity. Although contamination was common, surgical site infection was rare.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Drapes/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/microbiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Young Adult
3.
Otolaryngol Pol ; 65(6): 428-35, 2011.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22208940

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Analysis of surgical approaches to primary tumors localized in parapharyngeal space used in Head & Neck Cancer Department, Cancer Center Institute in Warsaw. Description of differences in terminology used to describe fascial compartments of the neck. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 8 selected patients who had an operation for primary parapharyngeal space neoplasm. Analysis has been done of operation protocols, diagnostic images, tumor size and histopathology. RESULTS: Transcervical, transparotid and transmandibular approaches were used with additional rhinotomy and craniotomy in selected cases. Selection of approach should take into account tumor localization, its size and histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Planning of surgical procedure for parapharyngeal space tumor should be based upon analysis of diagnostic images and selection of the approach depends on tumor localization, size and histopathology. Differences in terminology of superficial and middle cervical fascial compartments can lead to inappropriate clinical decisions.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Pharynx/pathology , Pharynx/surgery , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Adult , Craniotomy/methods , Female , Head/anatomy & histology , Humans , Male , Mandible/pathology , Mandible/surgery , Middle Aged , Osteotomy/methods , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Poland , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
4.
Otolaryngol Pol ; 59(6): 919-23, 2005.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16521466

ABSTRACT

Infection rate registered on the basis of clinical symptoms and of microbiological forms in patients treated in Surgery Division, Head & Neck Cancer Department during 2001-2003, was analyzed. Total number of patients treated was 2343. In 664 preoperative microbiological cultures have been obtained from suspected areas and in 52.8% of these a pathogen has been found. Patients undergoing major surgery received a prophylactic antibiotic selected by an infection control team and Microbiology Department. If preoperative cultures showed resistance to standard prophylactic antibiotic, another was selected on the antibiogram basis. Particular attention was paid to all the elements of prophylactic against infection in the ward, examination and dressing rooms, operating theatre. In 48% of patients, mainly those after extensive, prolonged surgery, antibiotics (usually 3rd generation cephalosporins) were used for 5-7 days. During 2001, 2002 and 2003 correspondingly 148, 97 and 58 infections were registered with positive culture and infection with clinical symptoms occurred in 30, 21 and 20 patients (4%, 2,8% i 2,3%). Comparisons of hospital infection rates between different institutions are very difficult, but relatively low rate in our material and decreasing number of infections registered during consecutive years show that persistent and multifaceted prophylactic interventions can result in significant reduction of hospital infections also in patients wits contaminated surgical field.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...