[Frontal mass simulating lipoma as a clinical presentation of prostatic adenocarcinoma]. / Bultoma frontal simulando lipoma como manifestación de adenocarcinoma de próstata.

OBJECTIVE: To report one case of metastatic prostatic carcinoma with a gaudy presentation as a lump which resulted to be a cutaneous metastasis. METHODS: We describe the debut in a patient, who thanks to the pathologic analysis of a lesion mimicking a lipoma, which was reported as adenocarcinoma, was worked up for prostatic adenocarcinoma and diagnosis was reached. We performed a bibliographic review using an electronic bibliographic search in PubMed (MEDLINE) using the terms "Prostatic Neoplasm" (MesH) AND "Neoplasm Metastasis" (MesH) AND "cutaneous" (free text). Most publications are case reports reviewing the probable dissemination way and localization. RESULTS: Positive immunohistochemical staining for PSA confirmed the origin of the metastasis, although PSA value did not offer doubts due to its value over 1100 ng/ml. Regarding the bibliographic search we obtained more than 26 papers, and selected only 8 that were adjusted to the objectives of our work. Cutaneous metastasis of prostatic origin appear in less than 0.3% of the cases, because bone, lymph node, and visceral disease are more frequent. Cases appearing during the evolution of the disease and metastasis after laparoscopic procedures are described. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous metastases of prostatic adenocarcinoma are very rare, but even rarer is it being the debut of the disease.

[Diagnostic and therapeutic management of renal hydatidosis]. / Manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de la hidatidosis renal.

OBJECTIVE: Renal hydatidosis is caused by Echinococcus granulosus and is extremely rare, accounting for 3-4% of the cases of hydatidosis, being the third site after liver and lungs. It generally remains asymptomatic for years and the most frequent symptoms are pain, feeling of flank heaviness, and dysuria. In front of a compatible clinical picture, we studied the diagnostic, therapeutic, and follow-up schemes reviewing the literature. METHODS: We performed an electronic bibliographic search in PubMed (MEDLINE) which MESH terms "Echinococcosis" [MeSH] AND "urinary tract" [MeSH] and bibliographic citations. We perform a review on epidemiology, vital cycle of the parasite and management of patients with hydatidosis. Most published papers correspond to case reports from different localisations, although we found some reviews. RESULTS: We found a total of 137 papers, we selected 23 of them because they were related; five were reviews, but we only include 10 of them in our references. Although most were case reports, the reviews analyse the cycle of the Echinococcus and its various host sites (organs) in the human host. The human being may become an intermediary host through contact with the definitive host (dogs) or by taking contaminated water or vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to the combination of history, imaging tests and serology we get close to the diagnosis in up to 80%. In many cases conservative surgery is possible, but after suspicion we should always sterilise with albendazole before surgical treatment, and monitor serum titles of anti-Echinococcus antibodies.

Bultoma frontal simulando lipoma como manifestación de adenocarcinoma de próstata / Frontal mass simulating lipoma as a clinical presentation of prostatic adenocarcinoma

OBJETIVO: Presentar un caso llamativo por la forma de presentación de un carcinoma de próstata metastátizado con la aparición de un “bultoma” que correspondía a una metástasis cutánea.MÉTODOS: Describimos la forma de debút de un paciente que gracias al análisis de la lesión que informó de un adenocarcinoma, que aparentaba un Lipoma, se investigó la posibilidad de ser un adenoca de próstata y se estableció el diagnóstico.Se ha realizado una revisión de la literatura mediante una búsqueda bibliográfica electrónica en PubMed (MEDLINE) utilizando los términos “Prostatic Neoplasm”(MesH) AND “Neoplasm Metastasis” (MesH) AND “cutaneous”(texto libre). La gran mayoría de las publicaciones corresponden a aportación de casos nuevos con revisión de la probable vía de diseminación y la localización.RESULTADOS: La tinción inmunohistoquímica con PSA positiva fue la que confirmó el origen de la Metástasis, aunque el valor del PSA no ofrecía dudas por valor superior a 1100 ng/ml. En relación con la búsqueda obtenemos mas de 26 trabajos, seleccionando para nuestra trabajo sólo 8 ya que se ajustan al objetivo del mismo. La aparición de metástasis cutáneas con origen prostático es inferior al 0,3%, ya que es mas frecuente la afectación ósea, en ganglios y visceras. Se describen casos en la evolución de la enfermedad y metástasis tras procedimientos laparoscópicos.CONCLUSIONES: La metástasis cutánea de una adenocarcinoma de próstata es muy rara, pero más aún que ésta sea el debut de la enfermedad (AU)

OBJECTIVE: To report one case of metastatic prostatic carcinoma with a gaudy presentation as a lump which resulted to be a cutaneous metastasis.METHODS: We describe the debut in a patient, who thanks to the pathologic analysis of a lesion mimicking a lipoma, which was reported as adenocarcinoma, was worked up for prostatic adenocarcinoma and diagnosis was reached.We performed a bibliographic review using an electronic bibliographic search in PubMed (MEDLINE) using the terms “Prostatic Neoplasm” (MesH) AND “Neoplasm Metastasis” (MesH) AND “cutaneous” (free text). Most publications are case reports reviewing the probable dissemination way and localization.RESULTS: Positive immunohistochemical staining for PSA confirmed the origin of the metastasis, although PSA value did not offer doubts due to its value over 1100 ng/ml. Regarding the bibliographic search we obtained more than 26 papers, and selected only 8 that were adjusted to the objectives of our work. Cutaneous metastasis of prostatic origin appear in less than 0.3% of the cases, because bone, lymph node, and visceral disease are more frequent. Cases appearing during the evolution of the disease and metastasis after laparoscopic procedures are described.CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous metastases of prostatic adenocarcinoma are very rare, but even rarer is it being the debut of the disease (AU)

Manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico de la hidatidosis renal / Diagnostic and therapeutic management of renal hydatidosis

OBJETIVO: La hidatidosis renal está causado por Echinococcus granulosus y es extremadamente infrecuente, constituyendo el 3-4% de los casos de hidatidosis, siendo la tercera localización tras el hígado y pulmones. Habitualmente permanece asintomático durante años y los síntomas más comunes son dolor, sensación de pesadez en flanco y disuria. Ante la aparición de un cuadro compatible, estudiamos la pauta diagnóstica, terapéutica y de seguimiento revisando la literatura.MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica electrónica PubMed (MEDLINE) con términos MESH “Equinococcosis”[MeSH] AND “Urinary Tract”[MeSH] y de citas bibliográficas. Hacemos una revisión de la epidemiología, el ciclo vital del parásito y del manejo del paciente afecto de Hidatidosis. La gran mayoría de las publicaciones corresponden a aportación de casos con diferentes localizaciones, aunque encontramos algunas revisiones.RESULTADOS: Encontramos un total de 137 trabajos de los cuales, seleccionamos veintitres por estar relacionados; cinco correspondían a revisiones, referenciamos en el texto sólo diez. Aunque la mayoría son aportación de casos, las revisiones analizan el ciclo del Echinococcus y los diferentes lugares de asentamiento (órganos) en el huésped hombre. El hombre puede llegar a ser huésped intermedio a través de contacto con huésped definitivo (perros...) o por ingesta de agua contaminada o vegetales.CONCLUSIONES: Gracias a la combinación de anamnesis, estudios de imagen y serología nos aproximamos al diagnóstico hasta en un 80%. En muchos casos es posible la cirugía conservadora pero tras la sospecha debemos siempre esterilizar con Albendazol antes del tratamiento quirúrgico y tras el tratamiento monitorizar mediante serología la titulación de Anticuerpos anti-echinococcus(AU)

OBJECTIVE: Renal hydatidosis is caused by Echinococcus granulosus and is extremely rare, accounting for 3-4% of the cases of hydatidosis, being the third site after liver and lungs. It generally remains asymptomatic for years and the most frequent symptoms are pain, feeling of flank heaviness, and dysuria. In front of a compatible clinical picture, we studied the diagnostic, therapeutic, and follow-up schemes reviewing the literature.METHODS: We performed an electronic bibliographic search in PubMed (MEDLINE) which MESH terms “ Echinococcosis”[MeSH] AND “urinary tract”[MeSH] and bibliographic citations. We perform a review on epidemiology, vital cycle of the parasite and management of patients with hydatidosis. Most published papers correspond to case reports from different localisations, although we found some reviews.RESULTS: We found a total of 137 papers, we selected 23 of them because they were related; five were reviews, but we only include 10 of them in our references. Although most were case reports, the reviews analyse the cycle of the Echinococcus and its various host sites (organs) in the human host. The human being may become an intermediary host through contact with the definitive host (dogs) or by taking contaminated water or vegetables.CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to the combination of history, imaging tests and serology we get close to the diagnosis in up to 80%. In many cases conservative surgery is possible, but after suspicion we should always sterilise with albendazole before surgical treatment, and monitor serum titles of anti- Echinococcus antibodies(AU)

[Voiding symptoms as presentation of an intravesical foreign body]. / Clínica miccional como síntoma por cuerpo extraño intravesical.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of intravesical foreign bodies is exceptional; it is not a common emergency. Most foreign bodies have a sexual-erotic origin, although we cannot forget others such as elements left by the surgeon in the surgical field. We performed a bibliographic review on the topic. METHODS: We performed a PubMed (MEDLINE) electronic bibliographic search with the mesh terms "foreign-body migration" [MESH] AND "Urinary Bladder" [MESH] and bibliographic citations. We performed a bibliographic review establishing a classification depending on the origin and diagnosis, as well as treatment. Most publications are case reports. We described the most frequent presentation which was the same than we have in our Center. RESULTS: We found a total of 122 works, nine of which were reviews; we selected 20 works. Although most are case reports, the reviews establish a classification depending on the origin: so, they refer to those foreign bodies directly introduced into the bladder: 1. By the patient: hairpins, safety pins, pencils, copper wires, hairs; 2. Accidentally: bullets; 3. Iatrogenic: fragments of bladder or ureteral catheters, staples, sutures. Foreign bodies migrated from other places: urological, gynecological, gastrointestinal, or vascular origin. We established a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder foreign bodies are not as frequent as it is believed. Most are found incidentally. Lower urinary tract symptoms are the most frequent, as the antecedent of manipulation by the patient or others in the genital-urologic sphere. The treatment of choice is extraction using the least invasive and most simple method for the patient.

Clínica miccional como síntoma por cuerpo extraño intravesical / Voiding symptoms as presentation of an intravesical foreign body

OBJETIVO: La presencia de cuerpos extraños intravesicales aparecen excepcionalmente, no siendo una urgencia habitual. La mayoría de cuerpos extraños son de origen erótico-sexual aunque no podemos olvidar otros como el abandono en el campo quirúrgico de algún elemento utilizado. A propósito de ello, revisamos la literatura. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica electrónica PubMed (MEDLINE) con términos MESH «Foreign-Body Migration» [MeSH] AND «Urinary Bladder» [MeSH] y de citas bibliográficas. Hacemos una revisión de la literatura estableciendo una clasificación atendiendo al origen y diagnóstico así como tratamiento. La gran mayoría de las publicaciones corresponden a aportación de casos nuevos. Describimos la forma de presentación más habitual que coincidía con el que tuvimos en nuestro Centro. RESULTADOS: Encontramos un total de 122 trabajos de los cuales nueve correspondían a una revisión; seleccionamos en total 20. Aunque la mayoría son aportación de casos, las revisiones, establece una clasificación en función del origen: así, hacen referencia a los introducidos directamente a la vejiga: -por la propia persona: horquillas, imperdibles, lápices, hilos de cobre, pelos; -accidentales: balas; -iatrógenos: fragmentos de sonda o catéteres, grapas, suturas. Migrados desde otros lugares:de origen urológicos, ginecológico, digestivo, vascular. Estableceremos un algoritmo diagnóstico y terapéutico. CONCLUSIONES: Los cuerpos extraños dentro de la vejiga no son tan infrecuentes como se cree. El hallazgo casual es lo más frecuentes. Los síntomas urinarios son los mas frecuentes y el antecedente de manipulación propia o de otros en esa esfera genito urológica y el tratamiento es la extracción utilizando el menos cruento y mas sencillo para el paciente (AU)

OBJECTIVES: The presence of intravesical foreign bodies is exceptional; it is not a common emergency. Most foreign bodies have a sexual-erotic origin, although we cannot forget others such as elements left by the surgeon in the surgical field. We performed a bibliographic review on the topic. METHODS: We performed a PubMed (MEDLINE) electronic bibliographic search with the mesh terms «foreign-body migration» [MESH] AND «Urinary Bladder» [MESH] and bibliographic citations. We performed a bibliographic review establishing a classification depending on the origin and diagnosis, as well as treatment. Most publications are case reports. We described the most frequent presentation which was the same than we have in our Center. RESULTS: We found a total of 122 works, nine of which were reviews; we selected 20 works. Although most are case reports, the reviews establish a classification depending on the origin: so, they refer to those foreign bodies directly introduced into the bladder: 1. By the patient: hairpins, safety pins, pencils, copper wires, hairs; 2. Accidentally: bullets; 3. Iatrogenic: fragments of bladder or ureteral catheters, staples, sutures. Foreign bodies migrated from other places: urological, gynecological, gastrointestinal, or vascular origin. We established a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder foreign bodies are not as frequent as it is believed. Most are found incidentally. Lower urinary tract symptoms are the most frequent, as the antecedent of manipulation by the patient or others in the genital-urologic sphere. The treatment of choice is extraction using the least invasive and most simple method for the patient (AU)