Prognostic factors affecting long term outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: results in a series of 100 Italian patients.

BACKGROUND: Long term results after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are disappointing because the disease tends to recur. In this study, the authors assessed prognostic factors affecting long term outcome, in the hope that these factors might be used in selecting HCC patients for surgery. METHODS: During the period 1977-1995, 100 consecutive patients underwent curative liver resection; 78 of 100 had HCC arising on preexisting cirrhosis (53 Child's Class A and 25 Child's Class B). Thirty-five prognostic factors were evaluated for their association with overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in univariate and multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards model). RESULTS: There were four postoperative deaths. Seven patients died in hospital of hepatorenal failure: six had Child's Class B cirrhosis and had undergone preoperative chemoembolization. Of the remaining 89 patients, 50 developed recurrence. All surviving Child's Class B patients had recurrence. Five-year OS, postoperative deaths included, was 38% (median, 36 months). Five-year DFS, postoperative deaths excluded, was 26% (median, 21 months). Independent prognostic factors for DFS were Child's class, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, alpha-fetoprotein, number of tumor nodules, width of resection margins, preoperative chemoembolization, and experience of the team that performed the surgery. Factors with an independent effect on OS were Child's class and width of resection margins. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection can provide long term DFS in HCC patients with normal liver function. In patients with liver function impairment or an inadequate resection margin, recurrences are almost certain to occur. Preoperative chemoembolization significantly prolongs DFS but may increase the risk of postoperative liver failure in patients with liver function impairment.

Adjustable Silicone Gastric Banding (ASGB): the Italian experience.

Adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) is a recently introduced gastric restrictive procedure. From April 1990 to April 1992, 85 patients underwent ASGB at our Department. Patients' characteristics were: 65 females, 20 males, mean age 39.6 years (range 17-60 years); body weight (BW) 127.9 +/- 23 kg; % ideal body weight (%IBW) 205 +/- 29; body mass index (BMI) 46 +/- 7; morbidly obese 68, super-obese 17. Mean follow-up is 353 days. Twelve months after the operation BW was 95.2 +/- 23 kg, % loss of excess BW 52.1 +/- 22, and % IBW 152.2 +/- 30 (45 patients). Mortality rate was zero and postoperative morbidity was insignificant. As late morbidity, we experienced two slippages of the band and six stoma-stenosis with pouch dilatation. Therefore, a surgical revision without removal of the band was performed in eight patients. The band was removed in one patient because of band erosion. In conclusion, ASGB is a safe and effective bariatric procedure. The weight loss is comparable to that produced by more extensive operations. Moreover, ASGB is fully reversible and adjustable to the patients' needs.

The Post-anaesthetic Recovery in Obesity Surgery: comparison between two anaesthetic techniques.

Forty morbidly obese patients, scheduled for restrictive gastric surgery, were anaesthetized with two different techniques. In group A (20 patients) anesthesia was induced and maintained with Propofol (total intravenous anesthesia, TIVA); in group B (20 patients) anesthesia was induced with Thiopental and maintained with Isoflurane (balanced anesthesia). At the end of surgery, recovery time (RT) and recovery score (RS) were assessed according to a modified Aldrete score. There was no difference of RS between group A and group B. RT was shorter (though not statistically significant) in group A than in group B. Our experience suggests that both techniques can be safely used in these patients, but with TIVA, patients appeared more awake and cooperative earlier. Such an advantage may be useful to prevent serious complications (thromboembolism and pulmonary failure) in the postoperative period.