Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pathog Glob Health ; 114(8): 451-456, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012280

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the important pathogens worldwide showing resistance to several widely used antibiotics. This has made the treatment of MRSA infections harder, especially due to their prevalence in the hospital setting. We evaluated the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of healthcare-associated MRSA infections with a focus on Vancomycin Intermediate S. Aureus (VISA) and macrolide-licosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) phenotypes. A total of 417 Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) cases were isolated between January 2017 and December 2018, through several clinical specimens collected from the University Hospital 'Luigi Vanvitelli' of Naples. We identified bacterial strains using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) and antimicrobial susceptibility using Phoenix BD (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA). Out of the total 417 S. aureus cases, 140 were MRSA (33.6%) and of these, 50% were soft tissue infections. All MRSA and Methicillin sensible S.aureus MSSA isolates were susceptible to linezolid and daptomycin. Two MRSA cases exhibited intermediate resistance to vancomycin and were of constitutive MLSB phenotype. Among the MRSA strains, 11.4% were constitutive and 43.6% were inducible MLSB phenotypes and 8.6% were macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype. This study characterized the epidemiological status, antibiotic resistance patterns, and current prevalent phenotypes of healthcare-associated MRSA. This knowledge can aid clinicians in improving the antimicrobial stewardship program by adapting appropriate guidelines for the proper use of MRSA antibacterial agents.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Hospitals, University , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology
3.
Ann Oncol ; 29(12): 2288-2295, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30304498

ABSTRACT

Quality of life (QoL) is a relevant end point and a topic of growing interest by both scientific community and regulatory authorities. Our aim was to review QoL prevalence as an end point in cancer phase III trials published in major journals and to evaluate QoL reporting deficiencies in terms of under-reporting and delay of publication. All issues published between 2012 and 2016 by 11 major journals were hand-searched for primary publications of phase III trials in adult patients with solid tumors. Information about end points was derived from paper and study protocol, when available. Secondary QoL publications were searched in PubMed. In total, 446 publications were eligible. In 210 (47.1%), QoL was not included among end points. QoL was not an end point in 40.1% of trials in the advanced/metastatic setting, 39.7% of profit trials and 53.6% of non-profit trials. Out of 231 primary publications of trials with QoL as secondary or exploratory end point, QoL results were available in 143 (61.9%). QoL results were absent in 37.6% of publications in the advanced/metastatic setting, in 37.1% of profit trials and 39.3% of non-profit trials. Proportion of trials not including QoL as end point or with missing QoL results was relevant in all tumor types and for all treatment types. Overall, 70 secondary QoL publications were found: for trials without QoL results in the primary publication, probability of secondary publication was 12.5%, 30.9% and 40.3% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Proportion of trials not reporting QoL results was similar in trials with positive results (36.5%) and with negative results (39.4%), but the probability of secondary publication was higher in positive trials. QoL is not included among end points in a relevant proportion of recently published phase III trials in solid tumors. In addition, QoL results are subject to significant under-reporting and delay in publication.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/standards , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Progression-Free Survival , Research Design/standards
4.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 125(3): 575-589, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28130586

ABSTRACT

The field of gene therapy has recently witnessed a number of major conceptual changes. Besides the traditional thinking that comprises the use of viral vectors for the delivery of a given therapeutic gene, a number of original approaches have been recently envisaged, focused on using vectors carrying genes to further modify basal ganglia circuits of interest. It is expected that these approaches will ultimately induce a therapeutic potential being sustained by gene-induced changes in brain circuits. Among others, at present, it is technically feasible to use viral vectors to (1) achieve a controlled release of neurotrophic factors, (2) conduct either a transient or permanent silencing of any given basal ganglia circuit of interest, (3) perform an in vivo cellular reprogramming by promoting the conversion of resident cells into dopaminergic-like neurons, and (4) improving levodopa efficacy over time by targeting aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase. Furthermore, extensive research efforts based on viral vectors are currently ongoing in an attempt to better replicate the dopaminergic neurodegeneration phenomena inherent to the progressive intraneuronal aggregation of alpha-synuclein. Finally, a number of incoming strategies will soon emerge over the horizon, these being sustained by the underlying goal of promoting alpha-synuclein clearance, such as, for instance, gene therapy initiatives based on increasing the activity of glucocerebrosidase. To provide adequate proof-of-concept on safety and efficacy and to push forward true translational initiatives based on these different types of gene therapies before entering into clinical trials, the use of non-human primate models undoubtedly plays an instrumental role.


Subject(s)
Genetic Therapy , Genetic Vectors , Parkinson Disease/therapy , alpha-Synuclein/genetics , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Primates
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...