ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The optimal index of microvascular function should be specific for the microvascular compartment. Yet, coronary flow reserve (CFR), despite being widely used to diagnose coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), is influenced by both epicardial and microvascular resistance. Conversely, microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) adjusts for fractional flow reserve (FFR), and thus is theoretically independent of epicardial resistance. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that MRR, unlike CFR, is not influenced by increasing epicardial resistance, and thus is a more specific index of microvascular function. METHODS: In a cohort of 16 patients that had undergone proximal left anterior descending artery stenting, we created four grades of artificial stenosis (no stenosis, mild, moderate, and severe) using a coronary angioplasty balloon inflated to different degrees within the stent. For each stenosis grade, we calculated CFR and MRR using continuous thermodilution (64 measurements of each) in order to assess their response to changing epicardial resistance. RESULTS: Graded balloon inflation resulted in a significant sequential decrease in mean FFR (no stenosis: 0.82 ±0.05; mild: 0.72 ±0.04; moderate: 0.61 ±0.05; severe: 0.48 ±0.09, p<0.001). This translated into a linear decrease in mean hyperaemic coronary flow (no stenosis: 170.5 ±66.8 ml/min; mild: 149.8 ±58.8 ml/min; moderate: 124.4 ±53.0 ml/min; severe: 94.0 ±45.2 ml/min, p<0.001). CFR exhibited a marked linear decrease with increasing stenosis (no stenosis: 2.5 ±0.9; mild: 2.2 ±0.8; moderate: 1.8 ±0.7; severe: 1.4 ±0.6), corresponding to a decrease of 0.3 for a decrease in FFR of 0.1 (p<0.001). In contrast, MRR exhibited a negligible decrease across all stenosis grades (no stenosis: 3.0 ±1.0; mild: 3.0 ±1.0; moderate: 2.9 ±1.0; severe: 2.8 ±1.0), corresponding to a decrease of just 0.05 for a decrease in FFR of 0.1 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: MRR, unlike CFR, is minimally influenced by epicardial resistance, and thus should be considered the more specific index of microvascular function. This suggests that MRR can also reliably evaluate microvascular function in patients with significant epicardial disease.
ABSTRACT
Hypothermia may attenuate reperfusion injury and thereby improve acute myocardial infarction therapy. Systemic cooling trials failed to reduce infarct size, perhaps because the target temperature was not reached fast enough. The use of selective intracoronary hypothermia combined with intracoronary temperature monitoring allows for titrating to target temperature and optimizing the cooling rate. We aimed to the test the feasibility of intracoronary cooling for controlled, selective myocardial hypothermia in an isolated beating pig heart. In five porcine hearts the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was occluded by an over-the-wire balloon (OTWB). After occlusion, saline at 22°C was infused through the OTWB lumen for 5 minutes into the infarct area at a rate of 30 ml/min. Thereafter the balloon was deflated but infusion continued with saline at 4°C for 5 minutes. Distal coronary temperature was continuously monitored by a pressure/temperature guidewire. Myocardial temperature at several locations in the infarct and control areas was recorded using needle thermistors. In the occlusion phase, coronary temperature decreased by 11.4°C (range 9.4-12.5°C). Myocardial temperature throughout the infarct area decreased by 5.1°C (range 1.8-8.1°C) within three minutes. During the reperfusion phase, coronary temperature decreased by 6.2°C (range 4.1-10.3°C) and myocardial temperature decreased by 4.5°C (range 1.5-7.4°C). Myocardial temperature outside the infarct area was not affected. In the isolated beating pig heart with acute occlusion of the LAD, we were able to rapidly "induce, maintain, and control" a stable intracoronary and myocardial target temperature of at least 4°C below body temperature without side effects and using standard PCI equipment, justifying further studies of this technique in humans.
ABSTRACT
Provisional or conditional stenting should be defined as the use of stents limited to those conditions and cases in which the operator, despite an aggressive balloon angioplasty technique with large balloons and high pressure, has been unable to obtain a result that ensures optimal chances of early and late patency. The paramount issue is how to discriminate the patients with optimal results after balloon angioplasty for whom additional stent implantation is unlikely to improve or may even worsen long-term outcome. The better results of elective stent implantation in the OPUS study suggest that visual assessment of the PTCA result is not sufficient to detect lesions with suboptimal lumen gain after PTCA. The addition of physiologic parameters (Doppler flow velocity measurements, fractional flow reserve) has improved the results of the provisional stent group, with the best outcome observed when complex lesions and multivessel treatment were included in these studies (FROST, DESTINI). Intravascular ultrasound, although more expensive and time-consuming, has the additional advantage to guide the dilatation strategy.
ABSTRACT
Although coronary stents have been the most important improvement in percutaneous coronary interventions in the last 10 years, it is well known to interventionalists that many patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have a favourable outcome without stenting. Coronary angiography, however, is not sensitive enough to identify those particular patients and it has been suggested that a combination of angiographic and functional criteria would be more suitable to distinguish patients with a low restenosis chance after plain balloon angioplasty. In the present study, the authors investigated the value of coronary pressure measurement for conditional stenting in 85 patients. It was demonstrated that in patients in whom a high fractional flow reserve (FFR) was present (> 0.90), the incidence of coronary events at two-year follow-up was almost three times lower than in those patients with an FFR below 0.90. Such high FFRs could be obtained in approximately 45% of all patients. In an additional group of patients, it was demonstrated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies that the mechanism of a high FFR after plain balloon angioplasty is most likely the result of a larger lumen compared with patients with a suboptimal FFR. This means that, in patients in whom both the angiographic and the functional result after PTCA is optimal, a restenosis rate is achieved similar to that achieved by stenting. Obviously, in such patients, additional stenting and a number of problems in the long-term possibly related to stenting can be avoided. Therefore, coronary angiography and coronary pressure measurement have a complementary value in the evaluation of PTCA results and such information can be easily obtained by using a pressure wire instead of a regular guidewire.
