Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Parasitol Res ; 118(1): 347-352, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30377795

ABSTRACT

Canine vector-borne pathogens (VBPs) are a group of globally distributed and rapidly spreading microorganisms transmitted by arthropods. In the present survey, we investigated Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia canis, Dirofilaria immitis and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato seroprevalence between three groups of dogs (asymptomatic, suspected and deceased) from continental and coastal regions of Croatia with the commercial point-of-care SNAP®4Dx®Plus for VBPs. The overall prevalence for tested pathogens in dogs was 6.1% with the highest prevalence detected for Anaplasma spp. (4.5%), while the remaining pathogens were found at a prevalence of less than 1% (E. canis 0.6%, B. burgdorferi s.l. 0.4%, D. immitis 0.6%). No statistically significant differences in VBP detection between dog cohorts could be found with the exception of D. immitis in the deceased group. Interestingly, no evidence of D. immitis could be found in the hearts of dogs in this group at necropsy, however. This study provides the first data on the seroprevalence of selected VBPs between dogs of different health statuses in Croatia. The results demonstrate that serological evidence of VBPs alone or in combination with co-infections were found just as frequently in asymptomatic dogs as those with suspected or confirmed evidence of VBP disease, raising questions about the pathogenic potential of these organisms in domesticated dogs.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/blood , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Anaplasma/immunology , Anaplasma/isolation & purification , Anaplasmosis/blood , Anaplasmosis/epidemiology , Anaplasmosis/microbiology , Animals , Borrelia burgdorferi/immunology , Borrelia burgdorferi/isolation & purification , Coinfection/blood , Coinfection/parasitology , Coinfection/veterinary , Croatia/epidemiology , Dirofilaria immitis/immunology , Dirofilaria immitis/isolation & purification , Dirofilariasis/blood , Dirofilariasis/epidemiology , Dirofilariasis/parasitology , Disease Vectors , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/parasitology , Dogs , Ehrlichia canis/immunology , Ehrlichia canis/isolation & purification , Ehrlichiosis/blood , Ehrlichiosis/epidemiology , Ehrlichiosis/microbiology , Ehrlichiosis/veterinary , Female , Lyme Disease/blood , Lyme Disease/epidemiology , Lyme Disease/microbiology , Lyme Disease/veterinary , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies
2.
Parasitol Res ; 116(11): 3019-3026, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28905230

ABSTRACT

The bacteria Anaplasma platys, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia canis are tick-borne agents that cause canine vector-borne disease. The prevalence of these pathogens in South Eastern Europe is unknown with the exception of an isolated case of A. platys detected in a dog imported into Germany from Croatia. To gain a better insight into their presence and prevalence, PCR-based screening for these bacterial pathogens was performed on domesticated dogs from different regions of Croatia. Blood samples from 1080 apparently healthy dogs from coastal and continental parts of Croatia as well as tissue samples collected from 63 deceased dogs with a history of anaemia and thrombocytopenia were collected for molecular screening by an Anaplasmataceae-specific 16S rRNA conventional PCR. Positive samples were confirmed using a second Anaplasmataceae-specific PCR assay with the PCR product sequenced for the purpose of bacterial species identification. All sequenced isolates were georeferenced and a kernel intensity estimator was used to identify clusters of greater case intensity. 42/1080 (3.8%; CI 2.7-5.0) of the healthy dogs were PCR positive for bacteria in the Anaplasmataceae. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene amplified from these positive samples revealed the presence of A. platys in 2.5% (CI 1.6-3.4%, 27 dogs), A. phagocytophilum in 0.3% (CI 0-0.6%, 3 dogs) and a Wolbachia endosymbiont in 1.1% (CI 0.4-1.6%, 12 dogs) of dogs screened in this study. Necropsied dogs were free from infection. Notably, no evidence of E. canis infection was found in any animal. This survey represents a rare molecular study of Anaplasmataceae in dogs in South Eastern Europe, confirming the presence of A. platys and A. phagocytophilum but not E. canis. The absence of E. canis was surprising given it has been described in all other Mediterranean countries surveyed and raises questions over the regional vector capacity of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma phagocytophilum/isolation & purification , Anaplasma/isolation & purification , Anaplasmosis/microbiology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Ehrlichia canis/isolation & purification , Rickettsiaceae Infections/veterinary , Wolbachia/isolation & purification , Anaplasma/classification , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/genetics , Anaplasmosis/epidemiology , Animals , Base Sequence , Croatia/epidemiology , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Dogs , Ehrlichiosis/veterinary , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , RNA, Bacterial , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Rhipicephalus sanguineus/microbiology , Rickettsiaceae Infections/epidemiology , Rickettsiaceae Infections/microbiology , Wolbachia/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...