Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 29(24): 5128-5139, 2023 12 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37773632

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive sarcoma for which standard chemotherapies achieve response rates under 30%. There are no effective targeted therapies against LMS. Most LMS are characterized by chromosomal instability (CIN), resulting in part from TP53 and RB1 co-inactivation and DNA damage repair defects. We sought to identify therapeutic targets that could exacerbate intrinsic CIN and DNA damage in LMS, inducing lethal genotoxicity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed clinical targeted sequencing in 287 LMS and genome-wide loss-of-function screens in 3 patient-derived LMS cell lines, to identify LMS-specific dependencies. We validated candidate targets by biochemical and cell-response assays in vitro and in seven mouse models. RESULTS: Clinical targeted sequencing revealed a high burden of somatic copy-number alterations (median fraction of the genome altered =0.62) and demonstrated homologous recombination deficiency signatures in 35% of LMS. Genome-wide short hairpin RNA screens demonstrated PRKDC (DNA-PKcs) and RPA2 essentiality, consistent with compensatory nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) hyper-dependence. DNA-PK inhibitor combinations with unconventionally low-dose doxorubicin had synergistic activity in LMS in vitro models. Combination therapy with peposertib and low-dose doxorubicin (standard or liposomal formulations) inhibited growth of 5 of 7 LMS mouse models without toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of DNA-PK inhibitors with unconventionally low, sensitizing, doxorubicin dosing showed synergistic effects in LMS in vitro and in vivo models, without discernable toxicity. These findings underscore the relevance of DNA damage repair alterations in LMS pathogenesis and identify dependence on NHEJ as a clinically actionable vulnerability in LMS.


Subject(s)
Leiomyosarcoma , Animals , Mice , Humans , Leiomyosarcoma/drug therapy , Leiomyosarcoma/genetics , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Damage , Doxorubicin/pharmacology , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , DNA
2.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis ; 1869(5): 166690, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36921738

ABSTRACT

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harbor mutated receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) KIT/PDGFRA, which provides an attractive therapeutic target. However, a majority of GISTs ultimately develop resistance to KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor imatinib, multiple therapeutic targets will be identified as a reasonable strategy in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Biological mechanisms of non-RTK activated CDC42 associated kinase 1 (ACK1) are still unclear, which has been found to be activated in GISTs. In the current report, ACK1 overexpression is demonstrated in GIST cell lines and biopsies. RNA-seq analysis and immunoblotting show that ACK1 expression is dependent on imatinib treatment time in GIST-T1 cell line. The colocalization/complex of KIT and ACK1 in GIST cells are observed, and ACK1 activation is in a partially KIT and CDC42 dependent manner. Treatment with a specific ACK1 inhibitor AIM-100 or ACK1 siRNA, mildly suppresses cell viability, but markedly inhibits cell migration in imatinib sensitive and in imatinib resistant GIST cell lines, which is associated with inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MAPK signaling pathways, and inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, evidencing upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of ZEB1, N-cadherin, vimentin, snail, and/or ß-catenin after treatment with AIM-100 or ACK1/CDC42 shRNAs. Combination inhibition of ACK1 and KIT results in additive effects of anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis as well as cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of invasiveness and migration in vitro and in vivo, compared to either intervention alone through dephosphorylation of KIT downstream intermediates (AKT, S6, and MAPK). Our data suggest that co-targeting of ACK1 and KIT might be a novel therapeutic strategy in imatinib-resistant GIST.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Humans , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Imatinib Mesylate/pharmacology , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/metabolism , Signal Transduction
3.
Cancer Sci ; 113(8): 2590-2599, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633186

ABSTRACT

Preclinical forms of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), small asymptomatic lesions, called microGIST, are detected in approximately 30% of the general population. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor driver mutation can be already detected in microGISTs, even if they do not progress into malignant cancer; these mutations are necessary, but insufficient events to foster tumor progression. Here we profiled the tissue microbiota of 60 gastrointestinal specimens in three different patient cohorts-micro, low-risk, and high-risk or metastatic GIST-exploring the compositional structure, predicted function, and microbial networks, with the aim of providing a complete overview of microbial ecology in GIST and its preclinical form. Comparing microGISTs and GISTs, both weighted and unweighted UniFrac and Bray-Curtis dissimilarities showed significant community-level separation between them and a pronounced difference in Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidota was observed. Through the LEfSe tool, potential microbial biomarkers associated with a specific type of lesion were identified. In particular, GIST samples were significantly enriched in the phylum Proteobacteria compared to microGISTs. Several pathways involved in sugar metabolism were also highlighted in GISTs; this was expected as cancer usually displays high aerobic glycolysis in place of oxidative phosphorylation and rise of glucose flux to promote anabolic request. Our results highlight that specific differences do exist in the tissue microbiome community between GIST and benign lesions and that microbiome restructuration can drive the carcinogenesis process.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Microbiota , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics
4.
Oncogene ; 40(48): 6614-6626, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34621020

ABSTRACT

KIT/PDGFRA oncogenic tyrosine kinase signaling is the central oncogenic event in most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), which are human malignant mesenchymal neoplasms that often feature myogenic differentiation. Although targeted inhibition of KIT/PDGFRA provides substantial clinical benefit, GIST cells adapt to KIT/PDGFRA driver suppression and eventually develop resistance. The specific molecular events leading to adaptive resistance in GIST remain unclear. By using clinically representative in vitro and in vivo GIST models and GIST patients' samples, we found that the E3 ubiquitin ligase Atrogin-1 (FBXO32)-the main effector of muscular atrophy in cachexia-resulted in the most critical gene derepressed in response to KIT inhibition, regardless the type of KIT primary or secondary mutation. Atrogin-1 in GISTs is transcriptionally controlled by the KIT-FOXO3a axis, thus indicating overlap with Atrogin-1 regulation mechanisms in nonneoplastic muscle cells. Further, Atrogin-1 overexpression was a GIST-cell-specific pro-survival mechanism that enabled the adaptation to KIT-targeted inhibition by apoptosis evasion through cell quiescence. Buttressed on these findings, we established in vitro and in vivo the preclinical proof-of-concept for co-targeting KIT and the ubiquitin pathway to maximize the therapeutic response to first-line imatinib treatment.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Imatinib Mesylate/pharmacology , Muscle Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , SKP Cullin F-Box Protein Ligases/antagonists & inhibitors , Sulfides/pharmacology , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Apoptosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cell Proliferation , Drug Therapy, Combination , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Mice , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
5.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 26(1): 53-62, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33645383

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Oncogenic activation of KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases is the crucial event in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) biology. Seminal works during the past two decades have underscored, first, the continuous relevance of KIT/PDGFRA oncogenic signaling after progression to targeted inhibition; second, the heterogeneity of KIT/PDGFRA acquired mutations, that cannot be efficiently suppressed by any given tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); and third, the presence of specific mutants highly resistant to all approved therapies. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses treatment options in advanced/metastatic GIST, including a detailed dissection of ripretinib and avapritinib, the two novel small molecule inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2020. EXPERT OPINION: The three only therapeutic options since 2012 for metastatic GIST patients were imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib. Although imatinib was highly effective in treatment-naïve GIST, the benefit of second- and third-line sunitinib and regorafenib was modest, thus emphasizing the medical need for new treatment options. Ripretinib, a switch control inhibitor with broad anti-KIT/PDGFRA activity, has been approved as ≥4th line in GIST after progression to all standard therapies. Avapritinib, a type I TKI highly specific against the multi-resistant PDGFRA D842V mutation, is approved in this specific subset of GIST patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Drug Design , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/genetics , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology
6.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 22(4): 32, 2021 02 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641024

ABSTRACT

OPINION STATEMENT: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) constitutes a paradigm for clinically effective targeted inhibition of oncogenic driver mutations. Therefore, GIST has emerged as a compelling clinical and biological model to study oncogene addiction and to validate preclinical concepts for drug response and drug resistance. Oncogenic activation of KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases is the essential drivers of GIST progression throughout all stages of the disease. Interestingly, KIT/PDGFRA genotype predicts the response to first-line imatinib and to all tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved or in investigation after imatinib failure. Considering that TKIs are effective only against a subset of KIT or PDGFRA resistance mutations, close monitoring of tumor dynamics with non-invasive methods such as liquid biopsy emerges as a necessary step forward in the field. Liquid biopsy, in contrast to solid tumor biopsy, aims to characterize tumors irrespective of heterogeneity. Although there are several components in the peripheral blood, most recent studies have been focused on circulating tumor (ct)DNA, due to the technological feasibility, the stability of DNA itself and DNA alterations, and the therapeutic development in precision oncology largely based on the identification of genetic driver mutations. In the present review, we systematically dissect the current wealth of data of ctDNA in GIST. To do so, a critical understanding of the promises and limitations of the current technologies will be followed by an exposition of the knowledge gathered with such studies in GIST. Collectively, our goal is to establish clear premises that can be used as the foundations to build future studies towards the clinical implementation of ctDNA evaluation in GIST patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/diagnosis , Liquid Biopsy , Circulating Tumor DNA , Clinical Decision-Making , Disease Management , Disease Susceptibility , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/etiology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/therapy , Genomics/methods , Genomics/standards , Humans , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Liquid Biopsy/standards , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Oncogenes , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 556, 2019 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aberrant expression of N-glycolyl GM3 ganglioside (NeuGcGM3) in patients with sarcomas was reevaluated by assessing the relation of this molecule with some clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of patients. METHODS: Fifty formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens from patients diagnosed with sarcomas were included. For the evaluation of NeuGcGM3, the 14F7 monoclonal antibody followed by a peroxidase avidin-biotin system was used. Clinicopathological features were obtained from patient records. Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. For multivariate analyses, the Cox regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS: The majority of samples had high levels of NeuGcGM3 expression (66.0%) that showed statistical correlation with age (p = 0.014), TNM stage (p = 0.022), histological grade (p = 0.013) and proliferation rates (p = 0.012). In addition, a tendency for association with tumor depth (p = 0.070) was evidenced. In univariate survival analysis, TNM stage (p = 0.000), occurrence of metastasis (p = 0.000) and expression of NeuGcGM3 (p = 0.034) were significant prognostic factors for OS, while a tendency for association was evidenced for histological grade (p = 0.091). Among these variables, only the presence of metastasis (p = 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present research suggests the evaluation of NeuGcGM3 expression as a complementary prognostic factor in sarcoma, although our results need to be validated in a larger series and prospective studies. Moreover, our results could support the use of this molecule as a target for immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
G(M3) Ganglioside/analogs & derivatives , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Sarcoma/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Proliferation , Female , G(M3) Ganglioside/metabolism , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Sarcoma/mortality , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...