ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical arthrodesis of the elbow joint is frequently unsuccessful and rarely performed. It is the purpose of this article to evaluate tactics and different constructs to achieve elbow arthrodesis (EA) using the Ilizarov apparatus in patients with post-traumatic nonreconstructable elbow sequelae. METHODS: A consecutive series of 4 patients were treated between 2009 and 2013 (3 men and 1 woman; mean age, 46.7 [35-75] years). Two patients had late complications in total elbow replacement and developed nonunion after condylar fractures of the distal humerus. There were 3 ulnohumeral arthrodeses and 1 radiohumeral arthrodesis. The hybrid advanced Ilizarov technique was used in all cases. RESULTS: Complete union was obtained in 3 EAs (75%) without additional surgery at an average of 23 weeks. Fusion angles ranged from 90° to 120°. One patient required amputation above the elbow because of persistent infection and chronic pain after attempted reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis for infected total elbow replacement with humeral bone loss. The average length of follow-up after EA was 33 months (range, 18-60 months). At final follow-up, the median score of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire was 42.4 (27.3-52.2). Three patients returned to their working activities. CONCLUSIONS: EA is not a common orthopedic procedure. Despite its difficulties and need of specific training, the Ilizarov technique provides a reproducible and reliable way of achieving solid fusion with the desired angle. Advantages include infection control, early mobilization, accurate application, convertibility and versatility compared with a monolateral fixator, and improved union rate.
Subject(s)
Arthrodesis/instrumentation , Elbow Joint/surgery , Ilizarov Technique/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osseointegration , Retrospective Studies , Return to Work , Elbow InjuriesABSTRACT
The healing process of bone is influenced by several biochemical, biomechanics, cellular, hormonal and pathological mechanisms. The ideal biomaterials should therefore guarantee the same mechanisms and be able to "heal". At present we do not have such materials at our disposal. We can anyway select among several biomaterials with different characteristics to best suit our need. In this paper we will overview some of the biomaterials used today in bone surgery with regard to their main biological properties as well as their compatibility.
