ABSTRACT
Spine radiosurgery treatment planning can be a challenging task since a high radiation dose is delivered to target volumes close to the spinal cord, therefore a steep dose gradient is required. Plan quality is greatly influenced by the planner skills, so automatic treatment planning has been proposed to overcome this issue and assure high-quality plans. The Brainlab Elements Spine SRS treatment planning system is specially designed for spine radiosurgery treatments. It is an automatic treatment planning system that works through predefined protocols, with minimal planner interaction required. In this work, we evaluated the plan quality and consistency among the planners within the same institution when using the Elements Spine SRS compared to manual inverse planning with the Varian Eclipse system. Six planners produced a plan for 3 sample target volumes representing different spine metastases in the thoracic region using both treatment planning systems. Dose prescription was 16 Gy in a single fraction, at more than 80% of the target volume. The most important organ at risk was the spinal canal. The dose constraint was V10 Gy < 0.35 cm3. High dose spillage outside the target volume, the homogeneity index, the Paddick conformity index and the number of monitor units were also evaluated. The mean dose to the target volumes in the Elements Spine SRS plans were consistently higher by 0.8 Gy to 1.5 Gy and the maximum dose to the target volumes were consistently higher by 1.8 Gy to 3.1 Gy. Spinal cord sparing was comparable to the Eclipse plans. However, the number of monitor units was greatly reduced, up to 2270 monitor units less. No difference was found in plan quality variability among the planners.
