Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Forensic Sci Int ; 240: 41-7, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24807707

ABSTRACT

The identification of the source of a specific soil sample is a crucial step in forensic investigations. Rapid advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technology and the strong reduction of the cost of sequencing have recently opened new perspectives. In the present work a metabarcoding approach has been successfully applied to forensic and environmental soil samples, allowing the accurate and sensitive analysis of microflora (mfDNA), plants, metazoa, and protozoa DNA. The identification of the biological component by DNA metabarcoding is a strong element for the discrimination of samples geologically very similar but coming for distinct environments.


Subject(s)
Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Soil Microbiology , Soil/chemistry , Animals , DNA, Bacterial , DNA, Plant , Forensic Sciences , Genome , Humans , Minerals/analysis
2.
J Biomol Screen ; 19(6): 859-69, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24632660

ABSTRACT

The CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is a widely expressed G protein-coupled receptor implicated in several diseases. In cancer, an increased number of surface CXCR4 receptors, in parallel with aberrant signaling, have been reported to influence several aspects of malignancy progression. CXCR4 activation by the specific ligand C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) induces several intracellular signaling pathways that have been selectively related to malignancy depending on the tissue or cell type. We developed a panel of CXCR4 screening assays investigating Gα(i)-mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate modulation, ß-arrestin recruitment, and receptor internalization. All of the assays were set up in recombinant cells and were used to test four reported CXCR4 antagonists. Consequently, a set of hit compounds, deriving from a screening campaign of a 30,000-small-molecule internal library, was profiled with the different assays. We identified several compounds showing a pathway-selective activity: antagonists on a Gα(i)-dependent pathway; antagonists on both the ß-arrestin and Gα(i)-dependent pathways, some of which induce receptor internalization; and compounds with an antagonist behavior in all of the readouts. The identified biased antagonists induce different functional states on CXCR4 and preferentially affect specific downstream responses from the activated receptor, thus providing an improved therapeutic profile for correction of CXCR4 abnormal signaling.


Subject(s)
Receptors, CXCR4/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Arrestins/chemistry , CHO Cells , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Separation , Chemokine CXCL12/chemistry , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Cyclic AMP/chemistry , Disease Progression , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Ligands , Mass Screening , Peptides/chemistry , Phosphorylation , Recombinant Proteins/chemistry , Signal Transduction , Small Molecule Libraries/chemistry , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , beta-Arrestins/chemistry , beta-Galactosidase/chemistry
3.
New Microbiol ; 27(3): 293-9, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15460533

ABSTRACT

Seventeen S. aureus clinical isolates, collected from an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during a seven-month period were analyzed to investigate their antimicrobial susceptibility and clonal diversity. Eleven isolates (65%) were found to be resistant to methicillin (MRSA). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of genomic DNAs, and analysis of the polymorphisms of the variable regions of the protein A (spa) and coagulase (coa) genes revealed a lower clonal heterogeneity among MRSA than among methicillin-susceptible isolates (MSSA). Two of the MRSA clones were repeatedly isolated in different patients, within a variable period of time, suggesting the presence in the ward of a resident, endemic and multi-drug resistant MRSA population. Our results also emphasize the lower discriminatory power of spa and coa typing compared with PFGE typing.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques , Intensive Care Units , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Chromosomes, Bacterial/genetics , Coagulase/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Genes, Bacterial , Hospitals, University , Inpatients , Italy , Methicillin Resistance , Polymorphism, Genetic , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Protein A/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...