Comparison of resident and medical student evaluation of faculty teaching.

Recognizing and rewarding teaching faculty are increasingly important to medical schools and are often hampered by low perceived reliability and validity of measures of teaching ability. The purpose of this study was to cross-validate two independently generated measures of teaching from medical students and residents. A total of 2,318 medical student and 4,425 resident scores for single-item measures of teaching ability for 129 teaching faculty members of a department of internal medicine over a 6-year period were compared. Results showed that average teaching scores were higher for medical students than residents. Rank order of faculty were within 2 quintiles for the two groups for over 90% of faculty. Highly discordant evaluations were seen for only 8% of faculty. The authors conclude the general concordance of two independent measures of teaching ability adds evidence to the existing literature of the validity of single-item measures of teaching ability from two different types of learners.

Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

In this study, psychometric principles were used to develop an outcomes questionnaire capable of measuring health state domains important to patients with hand disorders. These domains were hypothesized to include (1) overall hand function, (2) activities of daily living (ADL), (3) pain, (4) work performance, (5) aesthetics, and (6) patient satisfaction with hand function. An initial pool of 100 questions was pilot-tested for clarity in 20 patients; following factor analysis, the number of questions was reduced to a 37-item Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). The MHQ, along with the Short Form-12, a generic health status outcomes questionnaire, was then administered to 200 consecutive patients at a university-based hand surgery clinic and was subjected to reliability and validity testing. The mean time required to complete the questionnaire was 10 minutes (range, 7-20 minutes). Factor analysis supported the 6 hypothesized scales. Test-retest reliability using Spearman's correlation demonstrated substantial agreement, ranging from 0.81 for the aesthetics scale to 0.97 for the ADL scale. In testing for internal consistency, Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.86 for the pain scale to 0.97 for the ADL scale (values >0.7 for Cronbach's alpha are considered a good internal consistency). Correlation between scales gave evidence of construct validity. In comparing similar scales in the MHQ and the Short Form-12, a moderate correlation (range, 0.54-0.79) for the ADL, work performance, and pain scales was found. In evaluating the discriminate validity of the aesthetics scale, a significant difference (p = .0012) was found between the aesthetics scores for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The MHQ is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring hand outcomes. It can be used in a clinic setting with minimal burden to patients. The questions in the MHQ have undergone rigorous psychometric testing, and the MHQ is a promising instrument for evaluation of outcomes following hand surgery.

Clinical outcome of continuous facial nerve monitoring during primary parotidectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether continuous facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy is associated with a lower incidence of facial nerve paresis or paralysis compared with parotidectomy without monitoring and to assess the cost of such monitoring. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of outcomes for patients who underwent parotidectomy with or without continuous facial nerve monitoring. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-six patients undergoing parotidectomy in whom continuous electromyographic monitoring was used and 61 patients in whom it was not used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) The incidence of early and persistent facial nerve paresis or paralysis and (2) the cost associated with facial nerve monitoring. RESULTS: Early, unintentional facial weakness was significantly lower in the group monitored by electromyograpy (43.6%) than in the unmonitored group (62.3%) (P=.04). In the subgroup of patients without comorbid conditions or surgeries, early weakness in the monitored group (33.3%) remained statistically lower than the rate of early weakness in the unmonitored group (57.5%) (P=.03). There was no statistical difference in the final facial nerve function or incidence of permanent nerve injury between the groups or subgroups. After multivariate analysis, nonmonitored status (odds ratio [OR], 3.22), advancing age (OR, 1.47 per 10 years), and longer operative times (OR, 1.3 per hour) were the only significant independent predictive variables significantly associated with early postoperative facial weakness. The incremental cost of facial nerve monitoring was $379. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that continuous electromyographic monitoring of facial muscle during primary parotidectomy reduces the incidence of short-term postoperative facial paresis. Advantages and disadvantages of this technique need to be considered together with the additional costs in deciding whether routine use of continuous monitoring is a useful, cost-effective adjunct to parotid surgery.