A Summary of the American Society of Echocardiography Foundation Value-Based Healthcare: Summit 2014: The Role of Cardiovascular Ultrasound in the New Paradigm.

Value-Based Healthcare: Summit 2014 clearly achieved the three goals set forth at the beginning of this document. First, the live event informed and educated attendees through a discussion of the evolving value-based healthcare environment, including a collaborative effort to define the important role of cardiovascular ultrasound in that environment. Second, publication of these Summit proceedings in the Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography will inform a wider audience of the important insights gathered. Third, moving forward, the ASE will continue to build a ''living resource'' on its website, http://www.asecho.org, for clinicians, researchers, and administrators to use in advocating for the value of cardiovascular ultrasound in the new value-based healthcare environment. The ASE looks forward to incorporating many of the Summit recommendations as it works with its members, legislators, payers, hospital administrators, and researchers to demonstrate and increase the value of cardiovascular ultrasound. All Summit attendees shared in the infectious enthusiasm generated by this proactive approach to ensuring cardiovascular ultrasound's place as ''The Value Choice'' in cardiac imaging.

Cost of medical services in older patients with heart failure: those receiving enhanced monitoring using a computer-based telephonic monitoring system compared with those in usual care: the Heart Failure Home Care trial.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that disease management programs may be effective in improving clinical and economic outcomes in patients with heart failure. Whether these types of programs can lower health care cost and be adapted to the primary care setting is unknown. This study was designed to assess the impact of a home-based disease management program, the Alere DayLink HF Monitoring System (HFMS), on the clinical and economic outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries recently hospitalized for heart failure who received the care from a community-based primary care practitioner. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Heart Failure Home Care trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of sophisticated, monitoring of heart failure patients with an interactive program versus standard heart failure care with enhanced patient education and follow-up (SC) in Medicare-eligible patients. The study endpoints included cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure, length of hospital stay, total patient cost, and cost to Medicare at 6 months of enrollment. A total of 315 patients age ≥ 65 years old were randomized: 160 to the HFMS and 155 to SC. There were no significant statistical differences between the groups in regards to 6-month cardiac mortality, rehospitalizations for heart failure, or length of hospital stay. Of those, 304 patients had their Medicare data available. The information from the Medicare claims data was used to determine the cost. Information from the trial was used to determine costs of out-patient drugs and the interventions. The 6-month mean Medicare costs were estimated to be $17,837 and $13,886 for the HFMS and the SC groups, respectively. We found that overall medical costs of medicare patients were significantly higher for patients who were randomized to the HFMS arm than they were for the patients randomized to the SC arm. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that enhanced patient education and follow-up is as successful as a sophisticated home monitoring device with an interactive program and less costly in patients who are elderly and receive the care from a community-based primary care practitioner.

A randomized clinical trial of the clinical effects of enhanced heart failure monitoring using a computer-based telephonic monitoring system in older minorities and women.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest that disease management programs may be effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the use of these programs in settings with limited sources and among diverse population is not know. Thus the present study was designed to assess the impact of a computer-based home disease management program (Alere DayLink HF Monitoring System [HFMS]) on the clinical outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries with HF who were elderly, women, and non-white males who received the care from a community-based primary care practitioner. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Heart Failure Home Care (HFHC) trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of HFMS versus standard heart failure care (SC: enhanced patient education, education to clinicians, and follow-up). The primary study end point was treatment failure, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure within 6 months of enrollment. Among patients rehospitalized for HF, length of hospital stay was also considered a primary end point. A total of 315 patients were randomized: 160 to HFMS and 155 to SC. Although the incidence of the primary outcome was somewhat higher in the SC arm (28.8% versus 21.2%, P = .15), the difference was not statistically different. The length of hospital stay was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that enhanced patient education and follow-up is as successful as a sophisticated home monitoring device with an interactive program in patients with HF who are elderly, women and non-Caucasian males and receive the care from a community-based primary care practitioner.