Volumetric brain differences between the Roman rat strains: Neonatal handling effects, sensorimotor gating and working memory.

The present study was aimed at evaluating whether the differences between the Roman high- (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) rat strains in novelty-induced behavioural inhibition/disinhibition, sensorimotor gating (i.e., prepulse inhibition, PPI) and spatial learning/memory parallel differences in the volume of brain areas related to those behavioural phenotypes. To this aim, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, we evaluated the performance of adult rats from both strains, either untreated (controls) or treated with neonatal handling (NH; administered during the first 21 days of life), in a novel object exploration test (NOE), in the elevated zero-maze test (ZM) of anxiety, and in a PPI test; moreover, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to measure the volume of limbic and cortical brain regions (amygdala -Am-, hippocampus -Hc-, striatum -St-, medial prefrontal cortex -mPFc-, anterior cingulate cortex -ACC-, nucleus accumbens -NAc-) and lateral ventricles -LV-. In Experiment 2, adult rats neonatally exposed to NH and their naïve controls were submitted to the NOE and PPI tests, and to several spatial learning/memory tasks using the Morris water maze. It was found that, compared with their RLA counterparts, RHA rats show increased exploration of the novel object in the NOE test, lowered anxiety in the ZM and impaired PPI, whereas RLAs display better spatial reference learning and memory and better cognitive flexibility in a reversal task. Furthermore, MRI measurements revealed that the volume of Hc, Am and mPFc is larger in RLA vs. RHA rats, whereas the latter have dramatically enlarged lateral ventricles. NH treatment markedly enhanced exploration in the NOE test in RLA rats, improved PPI in RHA rats but impaired it in their RLA counterparts, and produced beneficial effects on spatial working memory mainly in RHA rats. Finally, exposure to NH decreased the volume of Hc and Am in the RLA strain. The results are discussed in terms of the possible relationships between strain-related volumetric brain differences and the behavioral (anxiety-related and schizophrenia-relevant) traits that distinguish RHA from RLA rats, and highlighting the finding that, in RLA rats, NH is for the first time shown to enduringly reduce the volume of Hc and Am in parallel to the decrease of anxiety and the impairment of sensorimotor gating.

The Roman high- and low-avoidance rats differ in the sensitivity to shock-induced suppression of drinking and to the anxiogenic effect of pentylenetetrazole.

The Roman high- (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) outbred rat lines are selected for respectively rapid vs. poor acquisition of active avoidant behavior. Emotional reactivity appears to be the most prominent behavioral difference between the two lines, with RLA rats being more fearful/anxious than their RHA counterparts. Accordingly, here we show that shock-induced inhibition of drinking behavior in the Vogel's test is significantly more pronounced in RLA than RHA rats. Thus, unpunished drinking activity is similar in both lines (38.1 ±â€¯0.9 and 36.4 ±â€¯0.6 licking periods/3 min in RLA and RHA rats, respectively), whereas under punished conditions (0.05-1.00 mA electric shocks delivered through the drinking tube) a more robust decrease in drinking behavior is observed in RLA vs. RHA rats. Moreover, fear-related behaviors like freezing and self-grooming are more frequent in RLA than RHA rats throughout the test. Similar results are obtained with the inbred RHA-I and RLA-I rats, which have been selected and bred through brother/sister mating of the outbred lines. In keeping with the above findings, we also show that, compared with their RHA counterparts, the outbred RLA rats are similarly responsive to the anticonflict effect of diazepam but more responsive to the proconflict effect of pentylenetetrazole in the Vogel's test. Collectively, these results reveal another behavioral trait distinguishing RHA from RLA rats and add experimental support to the view that the Roman lines/strains are a valid genetic model for the study of the neural underpinnings of fear/anxiety- and stress-related behaviors.

Dopamine, Noradrenaline and Differences in Sexual Behavior between Roman High and Low Avoidance Male Rats: A Microdialysis Study in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Roman High- (RHA) and Low-Avoidance (RLA) outbred rats, which differ for a respectively rapid vs. poor acquisition of the active avoidance response in the shuttle-box, display differences in sexual activity when put in the presence of a sexually receptive female rat. Indeed RHA rats show higher levels of sexual motivation and copulatory performance than RLA rats, which persist also after repeated sexual activity. These differences have been correlated to a higher tone of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system of RHA rats vs. RLA rats, revealed by the higher increase of dopamine found in the dialysate obtained from the nucleus accumbens of RHA than RLA rats during sexual activity. This work shows that extracellular dopamine and noradrenaline (NA) also, increase in the dialysate from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of male RHA and RLA rats put in the presence of an inaccessible female rat and more markedly during direct sexual interaction. Such increases in dopamine (and its main metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, DOPAC) and NA were found in both sexually naïve and experienced animals, but they were higher: (i) in RHA than in RLA rats; and (ii) in sexually experienced RHA and RLA rats than in their naïve counterparts. Finally, the differences in dopamine and NA in the mPFC occurred concomitantly to those in sexual activity, as RHA rats displayed higher levels of sexual motivation and copulatory performance than RLA rats in both the sexually naïve and experienced conditions. These results suggest that a higher dopaminergic tone also occurs in the mPFC, together with an increased noradrenergic tone, which may be involved in the different copulatory patterns found in RHA and RLA rats, as suggested for the mesolimbic dopaminergic system.

Differential effects of cocaine on extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in nuclei of the extended amygdala and prefrontal cortex of psychogenetically selected Roman high- and low-avoidance rats.

Roman high (RHA)- and low (RLA)-avoidance rats are selectively bred for rapid vs. poor acquisition of active avoidance, respectively, and differ markedly in emotional reactivity, coping style, and behavioral and neurochemical responses to morphine and psychostimulants. Accordingly, acute cocaine induces more robust increments in locomotion and dopamine output in the nucleus accumbens shell (AcbSh) of RHA than of RLA rats. Cocaine induces short- and long-term neuronal plasticity via activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. This study compares the effects of acute cocaine on ERK phosphorylation (pERK) in limbic brain areas of Roman rats. In RHA but not RLA rats, cocaine (5 mg/kg) increased pERK in the infralimbic prefrontal cortex and AcbSh, two areas involved in its acute effects, but did not modify pERK in the prelimbic prefrontal cortex and Acb core, which mediate the chronic effects of cocaine. Moreover, cocaine failed to affect pERK immunolabeling in the bed nucleus of stria terminalis pars lateralis and central amygdala of either line but increased it in the basolateral amygdala of RLA rats. These results extend to pERK expression previous findings on the greater sensitivity to acute cocaine of RHA vs. RLA rats and confirm the notion that genetic factors influence the differential responses of the Roman lines to addictive drugs. Moreover, they support the view that the Roman lines are a useful tool to investigate the molecular underpinnings of individual vulnerability to drug addiction.

Effects of chronic antidepressant treatments in a putative genetic model of vulnerability (Roman low-avoidance rats) and resistance (Roman high-avoidance rats) to stress-induced depression.

INTRODUCTION: The Roman low- (RLA) and high-avoidance (RHA) rats were selectively bred for, respectively, poor versus rapid acquisition of active avoidance in a shuttle box and, under aversive conditions, display reactive (RLA) versus proactive (RHA) coping behaviors. In the forced swim test (FST), RLA rats exhibit a depression-like behavior characterized by greater immobility and fewer climbing counts when compared with their RHA counterparts. Furthermore, subacute treatments with clinically effective antidepressant drugs decrease immobility and increase climbing or swimming in RLA rats but do not modify the performance of RHA rats. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Because chronic treatment with antidepressants is usually required to produce clinical effects, the present study was designed to compare the behaviors of RLA and RHA rats in the FST after subacute (1 day) and chronic (15 days) administration of desipramine, fluoxetine, and chlorimipramine. RESULTS: In RLA rats, subacute treatments with low doses of desipramine, fluoxetine, and chlorimipramine (2.5-5 mg/kg) were ineffective whereas chronic treatments with the same doses of all three antidepressants decreased immobility and also increased climbing (desipramine) or swimming (fluoxetine). By contrast, neither subacute nor chronic treatments with these antidepressants induced significant changes in the behavior of RHA rats in the FST. CONCLUSIONS: RLA and RHA rats represent two divergent phenotypes, respectively susceptible and resistant to develop depression-like behavior under aversive environmental conditions that may be used to identify genetically determined neural substrates and mechanisms underlying vulnerability and resistance to stress-induced depression.