ABSTRACT
Increased reinforcer motivation in rats has been repeatedly demonstrated following intermittent-access (IntA) training, where the reinforcer is only available for brief periods during a session, compared to continuous-access (ContA) training where the reinforcer is available throughout the session. The present study investigated whether different associations learned during training on the two procedures contributes to the effect. Two experiments tested the importance of the stimulus-response (S-R) and stimulus-outcome (S-O) associations between the IntA availability cues and the training response and reinforcer, respectively. In Exp. 1, separate groups of rats were trained to lever press for saccharin on the IntA or ContA procedures. Increased motivation for saccharin was observed in the IntA group on a later progressive ratio test where nosepoking was the operant (but not when lever pressing was the operant). The outcome of the nosepoke test suggests that a potential S-R association formed during IntA training was not critical for the effect. In Exp. 2, increased saccharin motivation (on nosepoke tests) after IntA training (with lever pressing) was observed regardless of the presence or absence of IntA availability cues, indicating that the S-O association formed during training is not critical for the effect either. Overall, these results suggest that the elemental associations learned on IntA procedures may not be what drives increased motivation observed after IntA training.
