Frailty Is not Associated with Mistreatment.

Muscle Frailty has been previously associated with increased vulnerability for adverse health-related outcomes that could lead to social consequences such as mistreatment. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to determine the association between frailty and mistreatment in 852 community-dwelling persons aged 70 or older. Mistreatment was defined as one positive answer in the Geriatric Mistreatment Scale and frailty was used as a continuum where the greater number of positive criteria according to Fried et al. indicates a higher frailty score. Multivariate logistic regression models were run to establish this association. The mean age of participants was 77.7 years (SD=6.1). Prevalence of frailty phenotype and mistreatment were 13.9% and 20% respectively. Unadjusted analysis showed frailty score was associated with mistreatment (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.3, p=0.022). However, after adjustment, the association was no longer present. The results showed that in the presence of other geriatric syndromes such as disability or depression, frailty did not show association with mistreatment in this population.

Cognitive impairment and low physical activity are the components of frailty more strongly associated with disability.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of the five frailty criteria from the Cardiovascular Health Study, as well as cognitive impairment, with prevalent disability for the instrumental (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (ADL). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 475 community-dwelling subjects aged 70 and older, participating in the Mexican Study of Nutritional and Psychosocial Markers of Frailty. MEASUREMENTS: Six probable frailty criteria were considered: weight loss, poor endurance, low physical activity, slowness, weakness, and cognitive impairment. The association of each component of frailty for IADL and ADL disability as main outcomes was determined constructing multivariate logistic regression analyses. Final models were adjusted by socio-demographic factors and the presence of the other five frailty components as covariates. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 78.1 (SD=6.2). The unadjusted results showed that each of the components of frailty, except weight loss, was associated with both IADL and ADL disability. However, after adjustment, only low physical activity [Odds ratio (OR) =3.27; 95% CI=1.56 to 6.85] and cognitive impairment (OR=2.06; 95% CI=1.04 to 4.06) remain independently associated with IADL disability. Regarding ADL disability, only a lower physical activity (OR=7.72; 95% CI=1.28 to 46.46) was associated with this outcome, whereas cognitive impairment was marginally associated but was not statistically significant (OR=5.45; 95% CI=0.91 to 32.57). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment and low physical activity are the main contributing factors of frailty phenotype to disability. Better understanding the independent contribution of each frailty subdimension to the different adverse-health outcomes may help to provide a more adequate management of frail elderly.