Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 109: 58-64, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitals are sources for acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Entero-bacterales (CRE), and it is believed that the contamination of healthcare personnel (HCP) hands and clothing play a major role in patient-to-patient transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine which HCP types, HCP-patient interactions, and patient characteristics are associated with greater transmission of CRE to HCP gloves and gowns in the hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study that enrolled patients with recent surveillance or clinical cultures positive for CRE at five hospitals in four states in the USA. HCP gloves and gown were cultured after patient care. Samples were also obtained from patients' stool, perianal area, and skin of the chest and arm to assess bacterial burden. FINDINGS: Among 313 CRE-colonized patients and 3070 glove and gown cultures obtained after patient care, HCP gloves and gowns were found to be contaminated with CRE 7.9% and 4.3% of the time, respectively. Contamination of either gloves or gowns occurred in 10.0% of interactions. Contamination was highest (15.3%) among respiratory therapists (odds ratio: 3.79; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-8.94) and when any HCP touched the patient (1.52; 1.10-2.12). Associations were also found between CRE transmission to HCP gloves or gown and: being in the intensive care unit, having a positive clinical culture, and increasing bacterial burden on the patient. CONCLUSION: CRE transmission to HCP gloves and gown occurred frequently. These findings may inform evidence-based policies about what situations and for which patients contact precautions are most important.


Subject(s)
Carbapenems , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae , Equipment Contamination , Protective Clothing , Cross Infection , Delivery of Health Care , Gloves, Protective , Humans , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 96(1): 49-53, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28410760

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 20-site Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown (BUGG) study found that wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contacts in the intensive care unit (ICU) reduced acquisition rates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The relative importance of gloves and gowns as a barrier, improved hand hygiene, and reduced healthcare worker (HCW)-patient contact rates is unknown. AIM: To determine what proportion of the reduction in acquisition rates observed in the BUGG study was due to improved hand hygiene, reduced contact rates, and universal glove and gown use using agent-based simulation modelling. METHODS: An existing agent-based model to simulate MRSA transmission dynamics in an ICU was modified, and the model was calibrated using site-specific data. Model validation was completed using data collected in the BUGG study. A full 2k factorial design was conducted to quantify the relative benefits of improving each of the aforementioned factors with respect to MRSA acquisition rates. FINDINGS: Across 40 simulated replications for each factorial design point and intervention site, approximately 44% of the decrease in MRSA acquisition rates was due to universal glove and gown use, 38.1% of the decrease was due to improvement in hand hygiene compliance on exiting patient rooms, and 14.5% of the decrease was due to the reduction in HCW-patient contact rates. CONCLUSION: Using mathematical modelling, the decrease in MRSA acquisition in the BUGG study was found to be due primarily to the barrier effects of gowns and gloves, followed by improved hand hygiene and lower HCW-patient contact rates.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Gloves, Protective/standards , Hand Disinfection/standards , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Protective Clothing/standards , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Microbial/physiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple/drug effects , Hand Disinfection/methods , Health Personnel , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units/standards , Models, Theoretical , Vancomycin Resistance/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...