ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Animal pollination is an important ecosystem function and service, ensuring both the integrity of natural systems and human well-being. Although many knowledge shortfalls remain, some high-quality data sets on biological interactions are now available. The development and adoption of standards for biodiversity data and metadata has promoted great advances in biological data sharing and aggregation, supporting large-scale studies and science-based public policies. However, these standards are currently not suitable to fully support interaction data sharing. RESULTS: Here we present a vocabulary of terms and a data model for sharing plant-pollinator interactions data based on the Darwin Core standard. The vocabulary introduces 48 new terms targeting several aspects of plant-pollinator interactions and can be used to capture information from different approaches and scales. Additionally, we provide solutions for data serialization using RDF, XML, and DwC-Archives and recommendations of existing controlled vocabularies for some of the terms. Our contribution supports open access to standardized data on plant-pollinator interactions. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of the vocabulary would facilitate data sharing to support studies ranging from the spatial and temporal distribution of interactions to the taxonomic, phenological, functional, and phylogenetic aspects of plant-pollinator interactions. We expect to fill data and knowledge gaps, thus further enabling scientific research on the ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator communities, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, and the development of public policies. The proposed data model is flexible and can be adapted for sharing other types of interactions data by developing discipline-specific vocabularies of terms.
Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Pollination , Animals , Biodiversity , Phylogeny , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
Invasive species can reach high abundances and dominate native environments. One of the most impressive examples of ecological invasions is the spread of the African subspecies of the honey bee throughout the Americas, starting from its introduction in a single locality in Brazil. The invasive honey bee is expected to more negatively impact bee community abundance and diversity than native dominant species, but this has not been tested previously. We developed a comprehensive and systematic bee sampling scheme, using a protocol deploying 11,520 pan traps across regions and crops for three years in Brazil. We found that invasive honey bees are now the single most dominant bee species. Such dominance has not only negative consequences for abundance and species richness of native bees but also for overall bee abundance (i.e., strong "numerical" effects of honey bees). Contrary to expectations, honey bees did not have stronger negative impacts than other native bees achieving similar levels of dominance (i.e., lack of negative "identity" effects of honey bees). These effects were markedly consistent across crop species, seasons and years, and were independent from land-use effects. Dominance could be a proxy of bee community degradation and more generally of the severity of ecological invasions.
Subject(s)
Crops, Agricultural , Introduced Species , Animals , Bees , Brazil , SeasonsABSTRACT
O conhecimento das interações entre plantas e seus polinizadores tem-se destacado como ferramenta na biologia da conservação de ambientes degradados, como a Mata Atlântica e no estudo da evolução de características morfológicas que medeiam estas interações. Neste estudo são apresentadas informações sobre a biologia reprodutiva e as interações com os visitantes florais de Sophora tomentosa e Crotalaria vitellina (Fabaceae), espécies comuns em áreas de restinga na Mata Atlântica no Núcleo Picinguaba, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, Ubatuba - São Paulo. Estas espécies são sincronopátricas, possuem flores amarelas dispostas em racemos e oferecem néctar como principal recurso. Ambas as espécies são autocompatíveis, mas dependem de polinizadores para formação de frutos e sementes. Xylocopa brasilianorum e Megachile sp.1 foram os polinizadores de S. tomentosa, ao passo que C. vitellina, além destas espécies, também foi polinizada por Bombus morio, Centris labrosa e mais duas espécies de Megachile. Estas espécies de abelhas possuem comprimento da língua compatível com as dimensões das câmaras nectaríferas, acessando o néctar por visitas legítimas. As inflorescências de S. tomentosa foram mais visitadas (0,62 visitas/inflorescência/dia) do que as de C. vitellina (0,37 visitas/inflorescência/dia). Entretanto, em condições naturais, a frutificação em S. tomentosa (33 por cento) é semelhante à de C. vitellina (42 por cento), provavelmente devido às diferenças na eficiência de cada polinizador. Espécies de Trigona e de Augochlora não têm acesso ao néctar em visitas legítimas, pois não possuem comprimento da língua compatível com as dimensões das câmaras nectaríferas. Portanto, as dimensões das câmaras nectaríferas de S. tomentosa e C. vitellina funcionam como barreira seletiva às espécies de abelhas com língua curta, assegurando maior oferta de néctar aos polinizadores. Ainda, os polinizadores destas leguminosas são comuns na restinga e atuam como vetores de pólen de diversas espécies neste ecossistema. Portanto a manutenção destas leguminosas é importante para a diversidade da fauna de abelhas e essencial para a comunidade de plantas.
The study of plant-pollinator interactions is a major tool for conservation biology of fragmented habitats like the Atlantic Rain Forest and for the study of evolutionary traits that rule these interactions. Information on reproductive biology and floral visitor interactions of Sophora tomentosa and Crotalaria vitellina (Fabaceae) is presented in this study. Both species are common in the restinga formation of the Atlantic Rain Forest in the Núcleo Picinguaba, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, Ubatuba - São Paulo. These species occur in the same areas, the flowering period is the same for both and they have yellow flowers that offer nectar as the major reward. Both are self-compatible, although fruit and seed set depend on the pollinators. Xylocopa brasilianorum and Megachile sp.1 were pollinators of S. tomentosa, whereas C. vitellina was pollinated by both the aforementioned bees and Bombus morio, Centris labrosa and two separate species of Megachile. All these bees have long tongues and are able to reach nectar at the bottom of the nectar chamber by legitimate visits. The inflorescences of S. tomentosa received more visits (0,62 visits/inflorescence/day) than the inflorescences of C. vitellina (0,37 visits/inflorescence/day). However, the fruit set of S. tomentosa (33 percent) is similar to that of C. vitellina (42 percent) in natural conditions, probably due to different pollinator efficiency. Having shorter tongues, Trigona and Augochlora bees have no access to the nectar chamber by means of legitimate visits. Hence, the dimensions of the nectar chamber of S. tomentosa and C. vitellina act as a selective barrier to short-tongued bees, thus guaranteeing more nectar to the long-tongued visitors. These legume pollinators are very common in the restinga forest, and they act as pollen vectors of other species in this ecosystem as well. The preservation of these legume plants is important to the diversity of bees and essential to the plant community.
