ABSTRACT
Abstract: Wearable cardioverter deï¬brillator has revealed a crucial device both in patients with a clear indication of ICD implantation but with temporary contraindications or in expectation of a diagnosis, considering that its use should be individualized.
Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Failure , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Electric Countershock , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) is emerging as a suitable option for most ICD candidates, however some open issues regarding the sensing algorithm still remain. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the performance of the S-ICD sensing algorithm in patients hospitalized for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), before and after revascularization. METHODS: We performed a S-ICD automated screening on 75 patients, 21 hospitalized for STEMI, 23 for NSTE-ACS and 31 for CCS, before and after percutaneous revascularization, regardless their eligibility to ICD implantation. RESULTS: Patients did not differ in clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. Rates of screening pass were significantly lower in STEMI patients compared to NSTE-ACS and CCS (5% vs 56.7% vs 81% respectively, p < .0001). The viability of the primary vector was lower in STEMI patients compared to NSTE-ACS and CCS (33% vs 56% vs 71%, p .027 respectively). After revascularization, there were no more significant differences between groups. Pairing subjects at baseline and after revascularization, STEMI subjects percentages of screening success were respectively 5% and 81% (p < .001) and the rates of primary vector viability were 33% and 81% (p .002). STEMI was the only independent predictor of screening failure at multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 10.68 confidence interval 2.77-41.38, p = .001). CONCLUSION: The performance of the S-ICD and possible malfunction detections in the context of an acute ischemic event deserve further evaluation. Adequate patient selection and the development of dynamic device programming are warranted.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction, reduced coronary flow reserve and increased markers of inflammation are detectable in cardiac syndrome X (CSX). In this study we investigated the relation between inflammation and systemic endothelial function in CSX patients. METHODS: We studied 42 CSX patients (55 +/- 6 years, 14 men) and 20 healthy subjects (52 +/- 7 years, 9 men). Systemic endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery after 5-minute of forearm cuff inflation. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured by a high-sensitivity method. RESULTS: FMD was significantly lower in CSX patients compared to controls (4.8 +/- 4.4 vs. 13.7 +/- 4%, p < 0.001), whereas CRP levels were higher in CSX patients than in controls (2.7 +/- 2.4 vs. 0.7 +/- 0.4 mg/L, p = 0.001). In CSX patients FMD showed a significant inverse correlation with CRP levels, even after adjustment for potentially confounding variables (r = -0.34, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: An impaired FMD is detectable in CSX patients, suggesting a generalized abnormality in vascular function. Subclinical inflammation se is to play a significant role in the impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilator function of these patients.