Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
South Med J ; 89(6): 573-7, 1996 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8638195

ABSTRACT

We studied the therapeutic substitution of a less expensive but equally effective antihypertensive agent and assessed patient outcome. The medication of 39 patients with hypertension was changed from once-daily diltiazem hydrochloride (Cardizem CD) or nifedipine (Procardia XL) to felodipine (Plendil). Titration to a final dose was based on home and office blood pressure measurements assessed over subsequent follow-up clinic visits. Self-administered questionnaires measured different aspects of well-being and symptoms before and after the change in medication. Eighty percent of the cohort switched successfully to felodipine. Office systolic and diastolic pressures improved after the medication change (systolic: 150 mm Hg versus 144 mm Hg; diastolic: 92 mm Hg versus 87 mm Hg). No statistically significant differences were found among the 39 symptoms measured. A yearly savings potential for our institution was estimated to be $72,000.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Felodipine/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/economics , Diltiazem/therapeutic use , Drug Costs , Felodipine/economics , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nifedipine/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...