Laryngeal Dystonia, Dystonic Tremor and Vocal Tremor: Three Different Entities.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with laryngeal dystonia (LD), dystonic tremor (DT), and vocal tremor (VT). STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective longitudinal study. METHODS: Data analysis from every patient diagnosed with LD, DT, or VT from January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2022, at a tertiary hospital center. Differential diagnosis between these entities was clinical (clinical history, voice assessment, and endoscopy) and confirmed by laryngeal electromyography. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included in this study: 50 patients with LD, 23 with DT, and 14 with VT. Age at diagnosis was significantly lower in patients with LD, with a mean age of 56.2 years when compared to DT (67.6 years; P = 0.002) and VT (70.5 years; P = 0.009). Furthermore, VT had a higher female prevalence (92.9%) when compared with LD (52%; P = 0.011). LD was mainly adductor, with only two patients diagnosed with abductor LD, and DT was adductor in every case. Tremor direction in patients with VT was horizontal in 50% and mixed (horizontal + vertical) in 50%, while in DT was mixed in 65.2% and horizontal in 34.8%. LD was more commonly an isolated laryngeal movement disorder (78%) when compared to DT (47.8%; P = 0.015) or VT (28.5%; P < 0.001), which were more often secondary to generalized neurological disorders. There were no differences between groups on Voice Handicap Index-10, self-reported grade of dysphonia on a visual analogic scale (0-10), maximum phonation time, and G, R, B, A, and I in the GRBAS-I scale at diagnosis (P > 0.05). S was significantly higher in LD when compared to VT (P < 0.001) and nonsignificantly higher than in DT (P = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: LD, DT, and VT seem to be different entities with different demographics and clinical characteristics.

Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Staging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Neck Dissection.

Introduction Clinical and pathological staging plays an important role on the prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Objective The present study aims to compare clinical and pathological T, N and overall staging in patients with HNC, to identify factors associated with these discrepancies, and to analyze and compare survival or disease-free survival in staging disagreements. Methods Retrospective cohort including every patient submitted to neck dissection from January 2010 to December 2020 in the department of Otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary hospital center. Results A total of 79 patients were analyzed; their mean age was 58.52 ± 13.15 years old and 88.9% were male. Assessing overall staging, discrepancies were noted in 53% (36.4% upstaging and 16.6% downstaging) and were significantly associated with clinical overall staging ( p = 0.006). Regarding T staging, differences were noted in 45.5% (30.3% upstaging and 15.2% downstaging) and were significantly associated with imaging modality ( p = 0.016), clinical T staging ( p = 0.049), and histology ( p = 0.017). Discrepancies in N staging were noted in 38% (25.3% upstaging and 12.7% downstaging) and were significantly associated with age ( p = 0.013), clinical N staging ( p < 0.001), and presence of extranodal invasion ( p < 0.001). Both in Overall, T, and N staging, the aforementioned disagreements were not associated with either higher mortality or higher disease relapse. Conclusion Overall, T, and N staging disagree in an important number of cases, and the overall stage can disagree in up to 53% of the cases. These disagreements do not seem to influence overall and disease-free survival.

Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Staging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Neck Dissection

Abstract Introduction Clinical and pathological staging plays an important role on the prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Objective The present study aims to compare clinical and pathological T, N and overall staging in patients with HNC, to identify factors associated with these discrepancies, and to analyze and compare survival or disease-free survival in staging disagreements. Methods Retrospective cohort including every patient submitted to neck dissection from January 2010 to December 2020 in the department of Otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary hospital center. Results A total of 79 patients were analyzed; their mean age was 58.52 ± 13.15 years old and 88.9% were male. Assessing overall staging, discrepancies were noted in 53% (36.4% upstaging and 16.6% downstaging) and were significantly associated with clinical overall staging (p = 0.006). Regarding T staging, differences were noted in 45.5% (30.3% upstaging and 15.2% downstaging) and were significantly associated with imaging modality (p = 0.016), clinical T staging (p = 0.049), and histology (p = 0.017). Discrepancies in N staging were noted in 38% (25.3% upstaging and 12.7% downstaging) and were significantly associated with age (p = 0.013), clinical N staging (p < 0.001), and presence of extranodal invasion (p < 0.001). Both in Overall, T, and N staging, the aforementioned disagreements were not associated with either higher mortality or higher disease relapse. Conclusion Overall, T, and N staging disagree in an important number of cases, and the overall stage can disagree in up to 53% of the cases. These disagreements do not seem to influence overall and disease-free survival.

Increased choroidal thickness is not a disease progression marker in keratoconus.

The recent findings of increased Choroidal Thickness (CT) in Keratoconus (KC) patients raised the question of whether CT could be an indicator of progressive KC. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated and compared the choroidal profile in progressive and non-progressive KC. We ran a cross-sectional observational study in 76 patients diagnosed with KC, age 14-30, to assess KC progression. Progression was defined as when at least two of the studied variables confirmed progression (Kmax, Km, PachyMin, D-Index, Astig, K2, 3 mm PCR). Included patients performed a Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth image (EDI) technology to evaluate choroidal profile. Choroidal measurements were taken subfoveally and at 500 µm intervals from the fovea, in 7 different locations, and compared between groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses were also performed to assess the influence of CT in KC progression. Thirty-six eyes (47.4%) were classified as KC progressors. The mean subfoveal CT observed in the total sample was 382.0 (± 97.0) µm. The comparison between groups (progressive and non-progressive KC) showed no differences in the locations evaluated (mean subfoveal CT difference between groups was 2.4 µm, p = 0.915). In the multivariate analysis CT seems not be influenced by KC progression (B = 6.72 µm, 95% CI - 40.09 to 53.53, p = 0.775). Assessment of choroidal profile does not appear to be a useful tool to differentiate progressive and non-progressive KC. Further research is needed in order to better understand the role of choroid in KC.