Changes and Associations Between Gait Biomechanics and Knee Inflammation After Aspiration and Glucocorticoid Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Although knee inflammation is thought to adversely affect joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), the effects of reducing knee inflammation on gait biomechanics and strength are unknown. Our objectives were to compare ultrasound (US) measures of knee inflammation, gait biomechanics, knee extension and flexion strength, and pain before and after knee aspiration and glucocorticoid injection, and to explore associations among changes. METHODS: Forty-nine patients (69 knees) with symptomatic knee OA and synovitis were tested before and 3-4 weeks after US-guided knee aspiration and glucocorticoid injection. At each visit, participants completed US assessments for inflammatory features of knee OA, 3D gait analysis, isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength tests, and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscales. Linear and polynomial mixed-effects regression models were used to investigate changes and their associations. RESULTS: Changes were observed for the synovitis score (unstandardized ß [post-injection minus pre-injection] -0.55/9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.97, -0.12]), effusion depth (-1.05 mm [95% CI -1.07, -0.39]), KOOS pain (unstandardized ß 5.91/100 [95% CI 1.86, 9.97]), peak external knee flexion and extension moments (KFM; 3.33 Nm [95% CI 0.45, 6.22]), KEM (-2.99 Nm [95% CI -5.93, -0.05]), and knee extension strength (4.70 Nm [95% CI 0.39, 9.00]) and flexion strength (3.91 Nm [95% CI 1.50, 6.81]). The external KFM increased during 13-38% and 76-89% of stance post-injection. When controlled for time, greater synovitis was associated with lower knee extension strength, while lower pain was associated with increased knee extension and flexion strength. CONCLUSION: In patients with knee OA and synovitis, reduced inflammation and pain after aspiration and glucocorticoid injection are associated with changes in knee gait biomechanics and strength.

Reliability and validity of knee angles and moments in patients with osteoarthritis using a treadmill-based gait analysis system.

BACKGROUND: Although commonly used to study knee osteoarthritis (OA), relatively little is known about the reliability and validity of three-dimensional (3D) gait biomechanics derived from treadmill-based systems. RESEARCH QUESTION: Using a treadmill-based gait analysis system, our objectives were to: 1) estimate the test-retest reliability of frontal and sagittal plane knee angles and moments in knee OA patients; 2) examine concurrent validity by estimating the associations between treadmill-based and overground (gold standard) measures; and 3) examine known-groups validity by comparing measures between knee OA patients and matched healthy controls. METHODS: 34 patients and 16 controls completed 3D gait analyses using treadmill-based and overground systems. Treadmill walking speed was matched to self-selected overground speed. Marker set, knee angle and moment calculations were consistent for both systems. Patients completed a second test session using the treadmill-based system <24 h later but within 1 week of the first test session. Variables calculated from knee angle and moment gait waveforms during stance were evaluated using Bland and Altman plots, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), Pearson correlations (r) and t-tests. RESULTS: Visual inspection of the Bland and Altman plots did not reveal any systematic differences between test and retest sessions; however, limits of agreement (LoA) were larger for the sagittal plane than the frontal plane. Mean differences between sessions for knee angles were <0.25 degrees and <0.18 %BW*ht for knee moments. ICCs ranged from 0.57-to-0.93 for test-retest reliability. Pearson correlations between treadmill and overground systems ranged from 0.56-to-0.97. Although highly associated, there were substantial differences in the moments, emphasizing they cannot be used interchangeably. Patients had greater first peak knee adduction moments (KAM) than controls [mean difference (95 %CI): 0.55 (-1.07, -0.04), p = 0.03]. SIGNIFICANCE: Results suggest frontal and sagittal plane knee angles and moments in patients with knee OA evaluated using a treadmill-based system are reliable and valid.