Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 97(2): 79-86, ago, 2022. tab
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-207557

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Las infecciones neonatales por Candida spp. son eventos graves por su morbimortalidad, sin embargo, en países en vías de desarrollo la información epidemiológica es insuficiente. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la incidencia y los factores asociados a la infección invasiva por Candida spp. en una unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales de México.Métodos: Estudio de casos y controles anidado en una cohorte y apareado por el peso al nacer. Se estimó la incidencia de infección neonatal invasiva por Candida spp., y para el análisis bivariado de los factores estudiados se usó la prueba de McNemar para contraste de hipótesis y análisis multivariado con regresión logística.Resultados: La incidencia de la infección fue de 2,27 eventos/1.000 RN vivos. Las especies identificadas fueron C. albicans 35,3% (n: 30), C. parapsilosis 30,6% (n: 26), C. glabrata 31,8% (n: 27) y 2 eventos con C. lipolytica. Los factores asociados a mayor riesgo fueron la ventilación mecánica (OR: 3,04; IC 95%: 1,13-8,14), los antibióticos sistémicos (OR: 7,48; IC 95%: 1,30-42,9), el número de esquemas antimicrobianos (OR: 2,02; IC 95%: 1,01-4,03) y los días con nutrición parenteral total (OR: 1,14; IC 95%: 1,04-1,25) o con catéter venoso central (OR: 1,11; IC 95%: 1,02-1,20). La profilaxis con fluconazol disminuyó el riesgo (OR: 0,32; IC 95%: 0,12-0,84).Conclusiones: Las intervenciones invasivas (catéter central, ventilación mecánica y nutrición parenteral) y el uso de antimicrobianos incrementan el riesgo de infección neonatal por Candida spp., mientras que el fluconazol profiláctico es protector. (AU)


Introduction: Neonatal Candida spp. infections are serious events due to their morbidity and mortality, however, epidemiological information is insufficient in developing countries. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and factors associated with invasive infection by Candida spp. in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Mexico.Methods: Case-control study nested in a cohort and matched for birth weight. We estimate the incidence of invasive neonatal infection by Candida spp. For the bivariate analysis of the studied factors, McNemar's test was used to contrast hypotheses and multivariate analysis was made with logistic regression.Results: The incidence of infection was 2.27 events/1000 live newborns. The species identified were C. albicans 35.3% (n 30), C. parapsilosis 30.6% (n 26), C. glabrata 31.8% (n 27) and two events with C. lipolytica. The factors associated with a higher risk were mechanical ventilation (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.13-8.14), systemic antibiotics (OR 7.48; 95% CI 1.30-42.9), number of antimicrobial regimens (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.01-4.03), and days with total parenteral nutrition (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.04-1.25) or with venous catheter central (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.20). Fluconazole prophylaxis decreased the risk (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.84).Conclusions: Invasive interventions (central catheter, mechanical ventilation, and parenteral nutrition) and the use of antimicrobials increase the risk of neonatal Candida spp. Infection, while prophylactic fluconazole is protective. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Candidiasis, Invasive , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/trends , Mexico
2.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 97(2): 79-86, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35850964

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal Candida spp. infections are serious events due to their morbidity and mortality, however, epidemiological information is insufficient in developing countries. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and factors associated with invasive infection by Candida spp. in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Mexico. METHODS: Case-control study nested in a cohort and matched for birth weight. We estimated the incidence of invasive neonatal infection by Candida spp. For the bivariate analysis of the studied factors, McNemar's test was used to contrast hypotheses and multivariate analysis was made with logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of infection was 2.27 events/1000 live newborns. The species identified were C. albicans 35.3% (n 30), C. parapsilosis 30.6% (n 26), C. glabrata 31.8% (n 27) and two events with C. lipolytica. The factors associated with a higher risk were mechanical ventilation (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.13-8.14), systemic antibiotics (OR 7.48, 95% CI 1.30-42.9), number of antimicrobial regimens (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.01-4.03), and days with total parenteral nutrition (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25) or with venous catheter central (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). Fluconazole prophylaxis decreased the risk (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive interventions (central catheter, mechanical ventilation, and parenteral nutrition) and the use of antimicrobials increase the risk of neonatal Candida spp. Infection, while prophylactic fluconazole is protective.


Subject(s)
Candidiasis, Invasive , Fluconazole , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida , Candida albicans , Candidiasis , Candidiasis, Invasive/drug therapy , Candidiasis, Invasive/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Mexico/epidemiology
3.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 2021 Jul 29.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334329

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal Candida spp. infections are serious events due to their morbidity and mortality, however, epidemiological information is insufficient in developing countries. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and factors associated with invasive infection by Candida spp. in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Mexico. METHODS: Case-control study nested in a cohort and matched for birth weight. We estimate the incidence of invasive neonatal infection by Candida spp. For the bivariate analysis of the studied factors, McNemar's test was used to contrast hypotheses and multivariate analysis was made with logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of infection was 2.27 events/1000 live newborns. The species identified were C. albicans 35.3% (n 30), C. parapsilosis 30.6% (n 26), C. glabrata 31.8% (n 27) and two events with C. lipolytica. The factors associated with a higher risk were mechanical ventilation (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.13-8.14), systemic antibiotics (OR 7.48; 95% CI 1.30-42.9), number of antimicrobial regimens (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.01-4.03), and days with total parenteral nutrition (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.04-1.25) or with venous catheter central (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.20). Fluconazole prophylaxis decreased the risk (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive interventions (central catheter, mechanical ventilation, and parenteral nutrition) and the use of antimicrobials increase the risk of neonatal Candida spp. Infection, while prophylactic fluconazole is protective.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...