Post-COVID-19 arthritis: a case report and literature review.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) is the novel pathogen responsible for the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outbreak. Researchers and clinicians are exploring the pathogenetic mechanisms of the viral-induced damage and growing interest is focusing on the short-term and long-term immune-mediated consequences triggered by the infection. We will focus on post-SARS-CoV2 infection arthritis which may arise as a new pathological condition associated with COVID-19. In this article, we describe a case of acute oligoarthritis occurring 13 days after a SARS-CoV2 severe pneumonia in a middle-aged Caucasian man and we go over a brief review of the current available literature. We hypothesize that molecular mimicry might be the basic immunological mechanism responsible for the onset of COVID-19-related arthritis based on the current knowledge of SARS-CoV2 and on the known pathogenetic mechanism of viral-induced arthritis.

New anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

In recent years, the significant limitations associated with the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have encouraged the development of new agents. Based upon the central roles played by the serine proteases thrombin and Factor Xa in the blood coagulation cascade, direct thrombin inhibitors and direct Factor Xa inhibitors have been developed. These agents, which include the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and idrabiotaparinux are free from many of the limitations of VKAs. According to the results of available phase III randomized clinical trials, both dabigatran and rivaroxaban are effective and safe enough to qualify as ideal oral anticoagulants for the initial and long-term treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rivaroxaban does not require an initial parenteral treatment and can be given in once daily administrations after the first three weeks. Both of them have limitations for the treatment of patients with severe renal failure, and require further investigations in cancer patients and in pregnant patients with VTE. Both of them lack an antidote.

The optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism: how long is long enough?

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) approaches 40% of all patients after 10 years of follow-up. This risk is higher in patients with permanent risk factors of thrombosis such as active cancer, prolonged immobilization from medical diseases, and antiphospholipid syndrome; in carriers of several thrombophilic abnormalities, including deficiencies of natural anticoagulants; and in patients with unprovoked presentation. Patients with permanent risk factors of thrombosis should receive indefinite anticoagulation, consisting of subtherapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin in cancer patients, and oral anticoagulants in all other conditions. Patients whose VTE is triggered by major surgery or trauma should be offered three months of anticoagulation. Patients with unprovoked VTE, including carriers of thrombophilia, and those whose thrombotic event is associated with minor risk factors (such as hormonal treatment, minor injuries, long travel) should receive at least three months of anticoagulation. The decision as to go on or discontinue anticoagulation after this period should be individually tailored and balanced against the haemorrhagic risk. Post-baseline variables, such as the D-dimer determination and the ultrasound assessment of residual thrombosis can help identify those patients in whom anticoagulation can be safely discontinued. As a few emerging anti-Xa and anti-IIa compounds seem to induce fewer haemorrhagic complications than conventional anticoagulation, while preserving at least the same effectiveness, they have the potential to open new scenarios for decisions regarding the duration of anticoagulation in patients with VTE.

The value of 64-detector row computed tomography for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.

Recently, a diagnostic strategy using a clinical decision rule, D-dimer testing and spiral computed tomography (CT) was found to be effective in the evaluation of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the rate of venous thromboembolic complications in the three-month follow-up of patients with negative CT was still substantial and included fatal events. It was the objective to evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulants after a normal 64-detector row CT (64-DCT) scan from a cohort of patients with suspected PE. A total of 545 consecutive patients with clinically suspected first episode of PE and either likely pre-test probability of PE (using the simplified Wells score) or unlikely pre-test probability in combination with a positive D-dimer underwent a 64-DCT. 64-DCT scanning was inconclusive in nine patients (1.6%), confirmed the presence of PE in 169 (31%), and ruled out the diagnosis in the remaining 367. During the three-month follow-up of the 367 patients one developed symptomatic distal deep-vein thrombosis (0.27%; 95%CI, 0.0 to 1.51%) and none developed PE (0 %; 95%CI, 0 to 1.0%). We conclude that 64-DCT scanning has the potential to safely exclude the presence of PE virtually in all patients presenting with clinical suspicion of this clinical disorder.

Multi-screen electronic alerts to augment venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in high-risk patients is frequently underutilised. We previously devised a one-screen computer alert program that identified hospitalised patients at high risk for VTE who were not receiving prophylaxis and advised their physicians to prescribe prophylaxis. While this strategy reduced the 90-day incidence of symptomatic VTE by 41%, the majority of electronic alerts were ignored. We have now developed a serial three-screen alert computer program designed to educate physicians who initially declined to order prophylaxis after a single screen alert. Of a total cohort of 880, the responsible physicians for 425 patients received a single electronic alert, whereas 455 who declined prophylaxis after the first screen received the second and third screens of the novel three-screen alert. Our enhanced serial three-screen alert program generated VTE prophylaxis orders for 58.4% of the 455 patients whose physicians initially declined to order prophylaxis following the one-screen alert. There was no significant difference in symptomatic 90-day VTE rates between the two cohorts (2.8% for the one-screen vs. 2.2% for the three-screen, p=0.55). We conclude that our three-screen computer alert program can markedly increase prophylaxis among physicians who decline an initial single screen alert.

Clinical efficacy and bioavailability of a sustained release nifedipine formulation.

A new oral sustained release formulation containing 20 mg nifedipine (Coral retard) was administered twice daily to 30 patients suffering from coronary diseases and/or hypertension, in order to assess its clinical effectiveness. The controls of blood pressure and pain before, during and after 30 days of treatment revealed a significantly good therapeutic action of the new formulation, both as an antihypertensive and an antianginal remedy. Blood examinations exhibited an optimum tolerability of the test product. Moreover, in 8 additional subjects free of cardiovascular and other diseases, the formulation was compared to a commercial sustained release product in order to evaluate its bioavailability after a single 20 mg dose. The product under study showed a satisfactory bioavailability when compared to the reference product. It is concluded that the new formulation can be successfully applied to the treatment of hypertensive and/or coronary diseases with a considerable simplification of the dosing schedule and an improved patient compliance.

Preliminary report on endothelial functional injury in brain arterioles of diabetic rats: in vivo observation of macromolecular transit across the vascular wall.

The coloring of longitudinal nuclei, resembling a convoy, was observed in vivo in the terminal arterioles of diabetic rat brain by means of a microcirculatory experimental model and Evans blue/albumin tracer. This emergency transit could confirm other well known passages across the vessel wall, or be considered as 'functional injury' of the diabetic endothelium, especially in case of the so-called brain-blood barrier.